Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Can't see 72 ever being a possibility unless we decide to have an early-week session (oh but the sounds!)


Quite a few people live over the Rye side of Dulwich anyway so I would say that the Rye Hotel or Nun's Head or even the new place (Village?) over that way would be eminently reachable/do-able/suitable. If it means less people (and I'm not convinced it does) then one upside is being able to talk to more people - when there are upwards of 35 people it's impossible to talk to a fraction of the people one would like to...


But that's for the NEXT time - the Mag has been chosen so let's not restart that debate... don't want the organising commitee to have a fit ;-)

Hi all


I will be very much looking forward to it being a Newbe to the EDF. Still trying to get my head around how it all works. Do i turn up with name plate hehehehe!!!! or do I put on my bold and brave hat and work up to the first strange person I see::o what a conundrum!!!!

cannonni Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi all

>

> I will be very much looking forward to it being a

> Newbe to the EDF. Still trying to get my head

> around how it all works. Do i turn up with name

> plate hehehehe!!!! or do I put on my bold and

> brave hat and work up to the first strange person

> I see::o what a conundrum!!!!


Either of those strategies would work, but the smart newbie would have a look at pictures of the last gathering http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?20,113115,page=1 before heading to the next one.

On the night you just approach the first person you recognise from the pictures. Also, hours of fun to be had speculating about who is who in the pictures, unless you're dorky enough to have been caught with your label on :-$ (those labels have got to go by the way!)

annaj wrote:-(those labels have got to go by the way!)



I did not realise the name tags were so offensive to you annaj.

I brought them along to make it easier for the newbies (er me) to recognise other forumistas, it was not intended to embarrass anyone and I apologise to you, and all the others who may have been labelled against their wishes.

I certainly haven't held a gun to anyones head to comply with the wearing of them.

I thought for the couple of hours which we are together it might help us all to remember more names and faces of people.

If the consensus of opinion is to scratch the use of name tags, I will immediately stop this potentially, unseemly obnoxious practice.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Having enjoyed a day with Sayce HolmesLewis, I understand what you’re saying.  I appreciate your courage responding on here. 
    • Thank you to everyone who has already shared their thoughts on this. Dawson Heights Estate in the 1980s, while not as infamous as some other estates, did have its share of anti-social behaviour and petty crime. My brother often used the estate as a shortcut when coming home from his girlfriend’s house, despite my parents warning him many times to avoid it. Policing during that era had a distinctly “tough on crime” approach. Teenagers, particularly those from working-class areas or minority communities, were routinely stopped, questioned, and in some cases, physically handled for minor infractions like loitering, skateboarding, or underage drinking. Respect for authority wasn’t just expected—it was demanded. Talking back to a police officer could escalate a situation very quickly, often with harsh consequences. This was a very different time. There were no body cameras, dash cams, or social media to hold anyone accountable or to provide a record of encounters. Policing was far more physical and immediate, with few technological safeguards to check officer behaviour. My brother wasn’t known to the police. He held a full-time job at the Army and Navy store in Lewisham and had recently been accepted into the army. Yet, on that night, he ran—not because he was guilty of anything—but because he knew exactly what would happen if he were caught on an estate late at night with a group of other boys. He was scared, and rightfully so.
    • I'm sure many people would look to see if someone needed help, and if so would do something about it, and at least phone the police if necessary if they didn't feel confident helping directly. At least I hope so. I'm sorry you don't feel safe, but surely ED isn't any less safe than most places. It's hardly a hotbed of crime, it's just that people don't post on here if nothing has happened! And before that, there were no highwaymen,  or any murders at all .... In what way exactly have we become "a soft apologetic society", whatever that means?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...