Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Menzies = Ming because the z isn't really one. It's a bastardisation of a now-lost letter that had the ng sound.


Not sure on sinjun though. Or Featherstonehaugh (Fanshaw) for that matter.


Here's one that me and the mrs can't settle: CLEMatis (my preferred one) or clem-AE-tis (hers)?

SimonM Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think you have to blame the Beeb for this one -

> the guy who read the football results always

> referred to "Shrowsbury Town"...


i always thought it was called "shrowsbury town nil".........

SimonM Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >>"Aluminium"

>

> I think that most Americans pronounce it as

> "aluminum"

> That's because they spell it that way though...




And your point is caller ?


to be honest it still grates when I hear them say it... much like DATA or DARTA

I've been having a little trouble recently with:


Tsaoische (sp?) - the boss of Ireland. I see it written all the time but how do you pronounce it!


Beatific - Be Ah tific? Not Beetific. Eh? Why?


Religious thingy - Diocese. How is this one supposed to sound?


And hyperbole - that's an annoying pronunciation.



Oh, and Beijing in Cantonese is "Bah Ging" and in Mandarin "Bay Jing/tsing". In English I'm sure that either Zj or J pronunciation is cool.



Current pet hate is leverage with lever rhyming with trevor. It is LEEEver! Oh and Process rhyming with crosses. It is PrOHcess! It's American business speak leaking into my office.



Charlie



Charlie

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> it's not QUITE 100% right DC - and I'm sure of of

> my compatriots on here might do a better phonetic

> - but it's close enough

>

> now.... MacGabhann - how DO you pronounce that ;-)


Like the lead singer of the Pogues? McGowan?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Of course  The tests are very stringent and they look carefully at claimants for things like how easily they can get up from an armless chair, if they don't use the chair arms thats a black mark, can they walk More 20 yards without problems including breathlessness, pain or even if they need aids (again over 20 yards reduces their chances of claiming) and so on  Trust me, having been assessed a few times, its not easy or guarenteed to get or maintain PIP.  But yes, the whole what is claimed for should be reviewed bur let's not penalise those who need it.  
    • Afternoon,   Does anyone have an Islabike 14 cnoc that their little one has grown out of and in need of a new home? I would prefer orange if possible or, failing that, blue or red.   Many thanks.    Michelle
    • Hello All,   I am looking for a Little Tikes covered sand pit. If you have one that your little ones have grown out of, please get in touch.   Many thanks in advance.   Michelle
    • My perspective is based on reason - my first comment was a question - what is driving the forecast increase in claimants. It suggests that - if so many new claims are expected, that either there is something seriously wrong or the tests are not sufficiently stringent. Happy for you to have a stab at that.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...