Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Menzies = Ming because the z isn't really one. It's a bastardisation of a now-lost letter that had the ng sound.


Not sure on sinjun though. Or Featherstonehaugh (Fanshaw) for that matter.


Here's one that me and the mrs can't settle: CLEMatis (my preferred one) or clem-AE-tis (hers)?

SimonM Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think you have to blame the Beeb for this one -

> the guy who read the football results always

> referred to "Shrowsbury Town"...


i always thought it was called "shrowsbury town nil".........

SimonM Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >>"Aluminium"

>

> I think that most Americans pronounce it as

> "aluminum"

> That's because they spell it that way though...




And your point is caller ?


to be honest it still grates when I hear them say it... much like DATA or DARTA

I've been having a little trouble recently with:


Tsaoische (sp?) - the boss of Ireland. I see it written all the time but how do you pronounce it!


Beatific - Be Ah tific? Not Beetific. Eh? Why?


Religious thingy - Diocese. How is this one supposed to sound?


And hyperbole - that's an annoying pronunciation.



Oh, and Beijing in Cantonese is "Bah Ging" and in Mandarin "Bay Jing/tsing". In English I'm sure that either Zj or J pronunciation is cool.



Current pet hate is leverage with lever rhyming with trevor. It is LEEEver! Oh and Process rhyming with crosses. It is PrOHcess! It's American business speak leaking into my office.



Charlie



Charlie

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> it's not QUITE 100% right DC - and I'm sure of of

> my compatriots on here might do a better phonetic

> - but it's close enough

>

> now.... MacGabhann - how DO you pronounce that ;-)


Like the lead singer of the Pogues? McGowan?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...