Jump to content

Recommended Posts

In answer to your question: almost without exception, yes.


Even in the rare bus lanes in which you're not allowed to cycle, you can usually still get away with it (turnings, shortcuts, etc.).


Certainly on the Old Kent Road, just use the bus lanes. They're generally safer.


As with most London cycling, the key is cycling assertively. If you don't think the vehicle behind you has space to pass, ride in the middle of the lane. They have no choice but to notice you and they're certainly unlikely to try and overtake unless they're very stupid or impatient. If you pull out to the right, the vehicle behind may try and pass you on the inside, your left; if you pull over to the left, the vehicle behind may try and overtake you, on the right, and may try and force you into the kerb if they run out of space.


I'm not advocating being deliberately difficult, but I do suggest you cycle assertively. The motorcyclists' mantra is "dominant and defensive", I'm told...



: P

I'll try to keep some perspective about this, but GRRRRRRRR: rant coming up...


I've ridden a motorbike in London for years, and I don't use bus lanes (as implied we all do by TP) because I'm not supposed to. Rules of the road, you see. Now, dear cyclists, lets talk lanes, pavements, running red lights... Assertive cycling is easily progressed thru into general road menace, who the rules don't apply to, and who not only act like they are the only one who has any rights on the road but also get all high and mighty about being healthy, zero carbon etc. GRRRR!


I haven't got a motorbike at the moment, so I'm on public transport. As a lifelong clausrophobic, this isn't a particularly comfortable experience, but I refuse to join the ranks of the London holier-than-thou cyclists. And that cyclists continue to bang on about how everyone else on the road needs to be more obedient and more considerate towards cyclists just takes the piss.


(sorry, not much perspective kept in the end, but this is a topic that really gets my blood up)

I said most not all and was giving my experience of cycling to work every day.


Pretty much all road users seem to behave pretty well to me. But there are certain actions which each group do which at best break the law, at worst are potentially lethal to themselves or others. Cyclists jumping red lights and riding on pavements, pedestrians stepping into the road without looking, car drivers speeding and not realing how vulnerable motorcyclists and cyclists are, motorcyclist speeding and using ASLs and bus lanes.


I don't cycle because I want to "join the ranks of the London holier-than-thou cyclists". I cycle because it's quicker and I don't have to go to the gym.

as a cyclist, a motorcyclist, car driver, and a bus user, I would really like you to give cycling a try before you rant about this yet again.



You assume I haven't?


Did for a year, many years back before all the congestion charging/CO2 emissions business. Wasn't very fit at the time so arriving everywhere exhausted and drenched in sweat was not ideal. But eventually stopped because of feeling intimidated by hardcore cyclists shouting at me when I was at the front of the q at the lights so that they could buzz thru and run the red.

> Did for a year, many years back before all the

> congestion charging/CO2 emissions business. Wasn't

> very fit at the time so arriving everywhere

> exhausted and drenched in sweat was not ideal. But

> eventually stopped because of feeling intimidated

> by hardcore cyclists shouting at me when I was at

> the front of the q at the lights so that they

> could buzz thru and run the red.



I'm very surprised - perhaps depends on where or when you're riding.


I've cycled to and from Central London for about seven years (rush hour only), and although I have seen many cyclists ride past me through red lights, I can honestly say that I've never been intimidated or shouted at by any of them.

Agreed. There is usually ample space to let those choosing to go through red lights through and I have never been shouted at for not doing it.


In re. motorbikes, I have on many occasions been shaken by a motorbike zooming very close past me in the bus lane as they undertake cars.

In a purely anecdotal/straw poll way, I think that generally (not always, particularly when there's a straight bit of road with no speed camera) motorcyclists are among the most considerate and best drivers on the road. However, they need to be differentiated from the scooter maniacs who are high on confidence and low on common sense.


As someone who cycles and tries not to break any of the rules of the road (but who has been known on occasion to go through a changing light or to hop over the tiny little bit of footpath at the end of Deptford High St) I do find the behaviour of the militant tendency of really aggressive cyclists (cycling down the pavement, straight through red lights etc) makes me want to shout at them. I don't though. So far. And I try not to preach at people about the benefits of cycling. Though I do complain about the state of the roads to anyone who'll listen.


Bus drivers in this town are mental. Full stop. They treat everyone equally badly. Not sure I would be any better if I spent my working life driving around London in something resembling a big barge, though.

AFAIK, traffic light sensors react to car headlights, so that at night a red light can turn to green to flow the traffic thru. I have seen motorists flashing to activate them.


As a driver/motorcyclist/pedestrian/bus user/train user/pushchair pusher but mainly a CYCLIST, I don't think motorcycles should be in bus lanes. Coming down Brixton Hill is pretty scary/dangerous as m/c's undertake traffic, but overtake bicycles.


I don't find buses too bad. I agree 100% that ASSERTIVENESS is the key. Other (highway code-ignoring) cyclists are the worst threat IMO.

On motorbikes in bus lanes, I'd have to say i don't think they should - the lane isn't wide enough for a bike and a bus together, which means a bike will hold up a bus if they can't get out of the bus lane once in it (bound to happen if a bike gets stuck between 2 buses, pretty likely during rush hour). Defeats the point of a bus lane.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Would have thought Oru/ Trinco would be noisy… certainly is at mid afternoon. Do let us know when you have been what is was like and where you finally settled on.sure we are all interested  as your requirements are quite specific and good to know or have reviews on places, especially from you with different needs and requirements. Actually, given the numbers involved and as you say a special occasion, assuming £20/30  head, you really should have a chat with Suzanne. Maybe your kids could chip in a bit more as they are working.. You could always provide a cake yourself for after. Her food is special and well cooked.. know what you are getting..!    Italian place is also good as well and would cater for your needs except of  course the toilet aspect which is a steep climb down stairs… even I struggle. Yes, , know you are not a fan of Vietnamese place after tea incident… Owner now does all the cooking and so nice and accommodating but you won’t go there.. Wish she got more support… had a bereavement recently…       
    • Depends on your definition of idiot.  I use the term to describe someone of low intellectual capacity.  But understand that this is now not used as seen to be offensive. In that respect he makes decisions that are good for him, and his close followers.  Whether they are in the interests of the US that is open to debate (in the same way that history will debate all major leaders eg was Thatcher/Reagan good for the UK/US). On line definitions: An idiot is most commonly a term for a stupid, foolish, or senseless person, often used as an insult or to express frustration with someone's silly behavior, but historically it was a clinical term for profound intellectual disability, which is now considered offensive and obsolete. The word comes from Greek roots meaning a "private person" or layman, evolving to signify ignorance and lack of skill before becoming a derogatory label for low mental capacity.  Modern Usage Self-deprecation: Used to describe one's own silly mistakes ("I felt like an idiot when I tripped").  Insult/Exclamation: A very foolish person or someone acting stupidly ("Don't be such an idiot!").  Historical/Obsolete Meaning Medical Classification: Once a technical term for someone with extreme intellectual disability (IQ below 25), a usage now rejected as offensive.  Origin Greek (idiōtēs😞 A private citizen, layman, or someone lacking professional knowledge. Latin (idiota😞 An uneducated or ignorant person.  The notable recent  'idiot' was Johnson who of course played the fool (lovable rogue) but that served him well So ultimately not a good word as it can be used in many ways. Ignorant is another good example - can be stupid, unaware, or simply rude.
    • Are you still needing this?
    • I couldn’t disagree more - Trump is an idiot and he was voted for by a combination of idiots, racists and arrogance  you can complain about weak opponents all you like - but when the alternative is a “strong” thug then the problem is those who favour the thug.  All we face was predicted  - and he doesn’t have widespread support across many parts of America. So that leaves parts of America responsible for this  oh and in the list of things you call him you forgot the bit about being a p(that’s enough! Ed)  Vance might be worse in many ways - but he doesn’t have the “glam” that Trump has. Once Trump is exposed properly or dies, nowhere near as many people will vote for his successor see also his embarrassing fanboy: Farage 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...