Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Email southwark admissions ASAP to go on Bessemer list...at least it will be easier to get to than Langbourne and you will be in a fantastic school where your child already has a friend. Then you have back up while waiting on the other lists....would think the southwark positions are pretty unlikely but you should be much higher up on Horniman....

I CANNOT believe how complex this system is. WHY OH WHY if this happens every year isn't there some more guidance published on what to do next - all the questions about waiting lists. I still don't fully understand. It's great that Southwark are putting on the drop in surgery thing, but Lewisham don't offer the same service. So if you live on the border, it's even more confusing (as previous poster has mentioned).


I also feel that each time I call admissions, be it Southwark or Lewisham its a game of 'ask the right questions, get the right answers'


ITS CRAZY.


Surely some extra pages in the massive brochure on admissions would be helpful - particularly as this problem isn't going away any time soon. It's left to worried parents to come on a forum and work out what the hell is going on!

The other thing that worries me is that all the people who are happy with 2/3/4/5/6 choices - are they told that they have been automatically added to waiting lists? I know MOST of my friends have NO IDEA about this. They've only found out through me! So surely that would leave a lot of people on the lists? Tell me the council sends reminders for people to come OFF lists?

Curmudgeon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Only the ones below the place offered so if you

> accept 3rd choice you remain on 1st and 2nd



I suppose I can see some sense in that, but it seems to further muddy and already muddy picture!

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Curmudgeon Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Only the ones below the place offered so if you

> > accept 3rd choice you remain on 1st and 2nd

>

>

> I suppose I can see some sense in that, but it

> seems to further muddy and already muddy picture!


Exactly!

Just had this in an email from Southwark, and they have also added me to Bessemer waiting list. Feeling a tad more confident.


'We have just had written confirmation from our colleagues in Lewisham

Admissions that Southwark residents need to inform me if they want to go

on Lewisham waiting lists, my team will then send this over to Lewisham

and they will action. I have also been informed by Lewisham that

waiting list positions will not be provided to parents until 2 May.'


I've just been emailing southwark admissions address and talking to Anita. Advise you to contact her if your in the same position as me, just to make sure everything works out as best as possible.

Should I just be logging on to Southwark now and rejecting my offer? If I forget come the deadline, they will automatically assume I want the place, right? So reject it now and hold out hope for a place somewhere else? I'm ever so confused with this one. Just know, I DO NOT want this place.

Hi all, I've had clarification from Southwark about what Lewisham are doing. Lewisham will add 'out borough' children to the school waiting lists when LAs start the file exchanges on 26 April. Their waiting lists will be compiled from 2 May and these will include late applicants too. They will not give parents any waiting list information until after this date.



With regards to waiting lists and offers. On offer day everyone was offered the highest place they could be or allocated a place, and then automatically placed on the waiting lists for Southwark schools higher than the school offered. This meant for example if you had applied to 6 Southwark schools and didn't get into them, you would be put on all 6 waiting lists. If you got your second choice school, you would be on the waiting list for your first choice one. Waiting lists are generated using the same admissions criteria as in the original application process. If offered a place at a higher ranked school parents can and often do turn it down, particularly if the place comes up towards the summer holidays and beyond.

Renata

I had a very strict warning about 'rejecting' a place from Lewisham just now. Do it, and you're on your own was more or less what they said.


I too have no intention of sending my child to the school suggested (it's too far away) but feel like I should accept to 'stay in the system'? Not sure really.

Abney, you were given this advice as by offering you a place, Lewisham have fulfilled their obligation to do so. If you turn it down, they have no obligation to find you another school place, so you could be left with no school place.

Renata

midivydale, they use their GIS (geographical information system). We found this tool which is based on Google maps but gives you distances based on specific points (rather than general postcodes): http://www.daftlogic.com/projects-advanced-google-maps-distance-calculator.htm. Beware though, it may give a slightly different result from the GIS so you can't fully rely on the distances it gives. You also need to know where the admissions criteria measure each point from (I think that's in the booklet we got before the application deadline).


We'd echo some of the sentiment about the process, we're not happy with what we've been offered... But I have to take my hat off to Anita in the admissions team and Liam from the schools preference service. They've been amazingly fast getting back to us at what must be an incredibly busy time. Thanks too to Renata for her speedy responses to our questions.

midivydale Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Does anyone know what tool they use to calculate

> the distances between home and school?



I've tried Google maps (giving us a distance of 420m from Goodrich), freemaptools as suggested by a previous poster (417m) and daftlogic as recommended above (438m). Yet Renata says that Goodrich has offered a place to applicants 457m away. We didn't get in, so I have no idea how or where they're measuring from...


Would agree, though, that Anita and the admissions team have been great with their quick responses. I emailed earlier asking to be added to some extra waiting lists, and she replied positively within a few minutes.


(NB anyone with queries about Goose Green - it's recently become an Academy, so you need to contact them directly instead of Southwark as they're no longer a community school).

Emski, the distance figure will (I think) include offers made to siblings - some of whom will live further away than "new" applicants through having moved house since other family members started at the school, or simply because the catchment used to be wider. In my children's classes at the school there are kids who live near ED station, and others that are on the Forest Hill side of the Horniman.

Pickle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Emski, the distance figure will (I think) include

> offers made to siblings


I'm not sure, Pickle - Renata said:

"Goodrich last place distance offered was 457 metres. Heber had a last place distance offer of 263 metres."

I understand that as an offer made on distance only. Renata, can you clarify?


20-30metres currently seems to equate to 5-10 places down a waiting list, so it would be helpful if Southwark could provide the means by which parents could accurately calculate distances I think.

http://www.walkjogrun.net/


Pickle/Emski : last place distance means non-sibling offers.


I use the above website to plot rough distances. If you click on 'create route' you can plot the distance from your house to the school gate (my understanding is they use school gate on their GIS software). It will do it as the crow flies.


It won't be exactly the same as the results from their GIS software but is pretty accurate.

Thanks Indiana, have tried this site too - from the furthest point of our property to the furthest part of Goodrich is 450m. So looks like being the closest to Southwark's software. (Still suggests we're nearer than this mythical 457m though - grr!)


Attempting to be philosophical, I guess it shows the tiny distances that are making all the difference for us.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I would like to understand this promise by the Greens in greater detail and how it applies locally? Presumably road/pavement upkeep and renewal is as important for cyclists and pedestrians as motorists? I am not aware of plans to build new roads locally but there has been plenty of money spent on converting roads into pedestrian only areas. On the face of it this feels a slightly empty statement, when applied at local level. I'd love to know the Greens stance in hiring out parks for private use (given impact on park environment), I'd also like to understand their stance on fireworks- I will look to see if I can find anything. I don't know if a manifesto exists under the documents section of Southwark Greens, but you can only access that bit by signing in- which is disappointing. If anyone has a manifesto that reflects local priorities- could they post a link?
    • You are most likely correct in thinking that  Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew it.  But they obviously thought that his skills, abilities and usefulness far outweighed the negatives. Here is a summary of the positives lifted from elsewhere:-   1. Strategic Architect: He was a primary architect of "New Labour," rebranding the party and shifting its core ideology to win the 1997 general election. 2 Master of Communication: Often called the original "spin doctor," he revolutionised how political parties manage the media. He famously created the "grid" system to coordinate government messaging. 3 Networking and Charm: Known as "Silvertongue," he possesses a peerless ability to charm and network with high-level global figures, including business leaders and heads of state. 4. Governance and Trade Expertise: Beyond strategy, he was considered a highly efficient minister, serving as European Commissioner for Trade and Secretary of State across multiple departments, including Business and Northern Ireland.  5. Reinvention: His capacity to adapt to changing political climates and rebuild relationships reflects personal resilience and strategic flexibility. With his skill and abilities, he delivered results for all his bosses. In the short time in Washington, he found a way to get on the right side of Trump - despite him  being critical of Trump in previous years. That said he is complex personality.  He can be simultaneously brilliant and arrogant, thick-skinned yet sensitive, and selfless for his party while appearing narcissistic in his personal dealings.  My OP asked if he would be accepted over the pond. It turned out he was because he got on famously with trump. He worked out the correct strategy to get on the good side of Trump and secured a better trade deal than the EU and other nations.    
    • Malumbu, do you happen to know what the current figure is for "trips into town made by walking, cycling and public transport"? 
    • Before voting, do you not think it's logical to evaluate each party on its policies and make a tally of the reasons "For" and "Against" voting for each party.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...