Jump to content

Recommended Posts

londoner_77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This sounds great. Dulwich Village is woefully

> (and surprisingly!) lacking in decent places to

> have a drink or meal!


xxxxxx


Eh?


The Dog is fine to have a drink in.


Don't know about the food as I've never eaten there.


ETA: I mean never eaten there in its most recent incarnation.


I had one of the very worst meals of my life there about ten years ago ......

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Used to be a Bikers Pub in the 70's..

>

> At one time there was a small middle bar for men.

> No women allowed.

>

> Foxy.


Blimey - what were the Dulwich Estate up to allowing a Bikers pub into the village - they won't even allow cashpoints!

Toldyouso Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jah Lush Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Most of those bikers were my mates.

>

>

> And I am sure they were charming people - my point

> was more directed at the conservative nature of

> the Dulwich Estate ...


I popped into the Dog last week and asked and they said the pub would stay the same but obviously the hotel bit would need the approval of the Dulwich Estate, which it still hasn't got. And, knowing the Dulwich Estate it will probably be a resounding "No." That's my take on it.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ruffers Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > When does a hotel become boutique?

>

>

> When they're hoping to charge more for the rooms.


When it's in Dulwich Village and not East Dulwich.


Louisa.

As you say, it's "fine" but not "great". I wouldn't go out of my way to visit it. Dulwich Village could do with some more destination restaurants and pubs IMO - and this sounds like it could be just the ticket.



Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> londoner_77 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > This sounds great. Dulwich Village is woefully

> > (and surprisingly!) lacking in decent places to

> > have a drink or meal!

>

> xxxxxx

>

> Eh?

>

> The Dog is fine to have a drink in.

>

> Don't know about the food as I've never eaten

> there.

>

> ETA: I mean never eaten there in its most recent

> incarnation.

>

> I had one of the very worst meals of my life there

> about ten years ago ......

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
    • I guess its the thing these days to demonstrate an attitude, in this instance seemingly of the negative kind, instead of taking pride in your work and have standards then 🤷‍♀️
    • Nope, I'd just get on with my day and forget about it. And I wouldn't report them on the basis that they might spill my coffee in the future.  However the OP seems to think that this young woman is deliberately pushing her bell, slamming her gate etc, having repeatedly been asked not to. I'd wager the woman is a bit pee'd off and there's a bit of a stand-off going on. Best course of action is to go out, take the parcel, smile sweetly, say hello, tell her you hope she's having a nice day / staying cool etc, in a way that comes across as genuine and not pass-agg,  and to let it diffuse. Might find it calms down a bit.  But I like the girl hate the idea of her being denigrated on here when she works so hard. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...