Jump to content

Recommended Posts

EDF sellers who will not give up trying to sell their crappy overpriced items.


In 3rd place buddug - shabby chic cushion 897 views


In 2nd place dulwichcookie - filing cabinet 1002 views


And First place goes to .....


davidhealy with 1093 views for his Ikea white shelf.


Somebody please buy these items and put these three people out of their misery.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/31686-named-shamed/
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Oh yeah, the 'trash on wheels' table is a funny ad !

Almost as funny as the praise it garnered.

Inspired me to 'up cycle' some old bricks in my yard, which are now quirky original Victorian hand-made masonry door stops. ?45 each, or, broken in half, ?60 a pair.


Fair play though, after all - don't ask don't get.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/31686-named-shamed/#findComment-679018
Share on other sites

LadyDeliah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This was brought to my attention by another

> forumite and I think has to be a first place

> contender.

>

> This poster slapped a bit of wood stain and

> castors on a pallet and is selling it for ?260.

>

> http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?9

> ,1175012


OMG - ?260 is taking things a bit far

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/31686-named-shamed/#findComment-679021
Share on other sites

Handcrafted coffee table = Yes, I screwed those castors on my self


up-cycled from reclaimed wood = I found a pallet at the back of the roofing shop


and made in East Dulwich = Coz I live there


I don't like the 'Rustins Dark Walnut Quick dry acrylic satin finish' tho. Not in keeping with its industrial heritage sadly.


Other wise, it's an absolute bargain/piece of sh*t

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/31686-named-shamed/#findComment-679026
Share on other sites

Saffron Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Decimal in the wrong place? Should be ?2.60.


No that's not right, even shifting the decimal along to ?26.00 just isn't fair, not for the effort put in.


What might be a FAIR price for something as knocked-up and impractical as this?


I'm feeling ?58.00 with the vendor throwing in a bacon ? egg McMuffin and a neck massage.


Seems fair.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/31686-named-shamed/#findComment-679165
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...