Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Have just spent a lovely couple of hours in the sunny beer garden with family and friends

but have learned that the pub has changed owners today and many

changes are afoot including the demolition of tbe children's play area.

The Herne attracts so many families and is the best family pub for miles.Not sure

why they have decided to get rid of play area...anyone have

any more info?

We were there today as well. It is a shame that they are getting rid of the play area. Seems a bit stupid as like you say it is so popular with families and has a bit of a unique selling point with the play area. I can't think of an other pub in the area with such a big garden and great (safe) play area for the kids. I wonder how many families will be put off going there if there is no play area for the kids. It was so lovely to be able to sit in the sun with a beer while the kids were happy and entertained. There are plenty of other pubs with nice gardens that are more adult friendly if you don't want kids playing around.
Yes, but if the they think they can double custom by making the outside area a beer garden, parents would need to be spending at twice the rate of the average punter to make up the lost revenue. They would have to assume that they would be very busy though so it might all be a folly anyhow!
Great news! A decent beer garden at last hopefully. About time as well - there are acres of park across the road for kids, plus a playground and adventure playground. I will definately be going to the Herne once the changes are made. Well done the new owners.

Smoking allowed times then.


Different rules as no parent would allow children into pubs with

hazy blue smoke everywhere.


I assume the smokers are not in the children's play area - haven't

ventured out of the bar when I visit..


StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Or we could just rewind 10 years to before the pub

> was taken over and count how many punters were

> kicking about in there/out in the garden

>

> spoiler alert: not enough to keep the pub in

> business. I think it got taken over

Based on Stacey-lyn's link it appears they still want to attract families but just want to increase how many people they can serve in the pub. Losing the entire garden to a playground must decrease total potential turnover. I guess they hope parents won't abandon the pub in droves just because it does not have a playground anymore. Let's see.

LondonMix Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Based on Stacey-lyn's link it appears they still

> want to attract families but just want to increase

> how many people they can serve in the pub. Losing

> the entire garden to a playground must decrease

> total potential turnover. I guess they hope

> parents won't abandon the pub in droves just

> because it does not have a playground anymore.

> Let's see.


The entire garden isn't lost to the playground. It occupies only a small part of it -- perhaps enough space for five or six extra tables. Getting rid of the playground seems mad to me.

It's a big old place. The playground bit takes-up a good portion of potential table space outside, but it can't account for much more than 25%, tops. Taking into account the inside, that's not a massive amount of overall capacity.


Lots of people with kids go not just because there's a mini-playground, but because the prescence of the mini-playground is like a big flashing light which says 'it's ok'.


The playground is the only real USP of that place.

To anyone with kids of a certain age, the playground overcomes all other failings (of which there are many) in one fell swoop.

sheilarose Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LondonMix Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Based on Stacey-lyn's link it appears they

> still

> > want to attract families but just want to

> increase

> > how many people they can serve in the pub.


My guess is that the new owners will be updating the website pronto.

If they do ditch the play area and even if ("if") it manages to hang onto its key clientele, the place will be even more fruitbat crazy kidz than it was before. There'll be nowhere to contain the little blighters and they'll just run around the tables screeching like banshees - as their limp parents make half-hearted efforts to chide them.


So anyone hoping for a quiet drink in the sunshine, post-change can think again.


If the new owners thoughts are 'hey, this pub's doing ok - let's take that playground bit out and make even more cash!' someone should tell them that the place used to be one giant morgue before it scooped the family crowd.

+2 customers - as if the pub does become more 'adult-oriented', I would certainly go there a lot more often! As someone without kids, I much prefer to have a quiet drink without children running around screaming, and as a result tend to avoid The Herne at all costs. However, I can see from parents' point of view it must have been good to have the play area to keep the children occupied, and to have such a family friendly local pub. I guess you just can't please everybody!



*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> UncleBen Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> I will definately be going to the Herne once the

> changes are made. Well done the new owners.

>

>

> Okaaay, so let me just keep a note this.

>

> So far, that's +1 punters

> .. and -300 punters

Girl82 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> +2 customers - as if the pub does become more

> 'adult-oriented', I would certainly go there a lot

> more often! As someone without kids, I much prefer

> to have a quiet drink without children running

> around screaming, and as a result tend to avoid

> The Herne at all costs.


I can't see this pub ever working as 'adult oriented' though. It'll never be adult-oriented enough to satisfy those who'd prefer not to mix with littluns. As it is it at least satisfies one group - and it's easy to avoid for anyone who wants to.

I have friends without kids and they don't mind kids in pubs if the balance is right. The Great Exhibition seems to have found that balance. The Herne though is impossible for people without children. It doesn't even feel like a pub. It feels like a childcare centre that serves booze.


Redressing the balance though is risky. They might not appeal to either demographic anymore which is a real gamble.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post arrives is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...