Jump to content

Recommended Posts

DuncanW Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The fire engine is at the DV end of Court Lane

> facing onto Calton Ave. There is no built out

> pavement there.

> Court Lane has double yellows on both sides at

> that end so looks more like it's illegally parked

> cars that have caused the problem.

>

> Unless there is something very odd about the

> perspective in the photo; as there is unrestricted

> parking a bit further back allowing for parking on

> both sides. But that predates the LTN, so not sure

> how that warrants the headline/angle of the

> story.

>

> The article states: The fire crew were hurtling

> towards an incident in Eynella Road on 11 April,

>

> That appliance is facing the opposite direction

> from Eynella. It's possible the driver overshot

> and was looking for a way back, but there are a

> further three or four right turns they would have

> gone past to rectify by this point.


Go and have a look - it doesn't have the problem any more.

Quick look on Google street view/Apple Maps Look Around, you can find the site more clearly using details in 2nd pic - end of cemetery, high brick wall, lamp post etc.


The location is further along Court than the foreshortening in first pic makes it appear.


Both Street View and Look Around images are pre-LTN, and there?s no yellow lines either side at this point.


The narrow access problem existed long before 2020.

Not just double yellowed but now has those blip things which should be more effective as no waiting to load/ unload. Good in principle(but they are horribly ugly and do add to the overall sense of decay of the area that has been created by so much signage, traffic lights with orange covers, mismatched street furniture and planters, planters that have weathered while there are signs on them and signs now removed, graffiti? if this closure stays I?m hoping it will be tidied up a bit, happy to pop down with a paint brush and some wood stain although my DIY skills are pretty limited?)

They do look ugly, but unfortunately needed if going to be successful at stopping drop offs.


Interesting point on the signage though - One Dulwich appear to be calling for more signs rather than fewer - and yet even with the many many signs, drivers are still missing or willfully ignoring the signage.


I'd understood that there was a codesign process scheduled in terms of the final version of the square and that the current landscaping is not what's intended.

The DYL have been extended in the last week - since the 1Dulwich concerns about the fire engine not being able to easily return to its depot. The engine drivers specifically said they couldn't get through because of the parked cars. The gap in the planters is the equivalent of what was a whole lane, its not an access problem through the gap.

My favourite sign is this one, which has been up for ages and relates to the previous redesign. In its current context I always think ?you?re not wrong there!?


They seem to have taken down the ugly blue streetspace ones (could have sworn they were there yesterday)

Oh look.....20% more traffic on East Dulwich Grove.... well obviously I wasn?t making it up!

https://www.southwark.gov.uk/transport-and-roads/improving-our-streets/live-projects/streetspace/traffic-data-analysis


Oh and also I was correct in this too ?No data collected for East Dulwich Grove Central prior to September 2021?

Whilst this is very tiresome to have to keep doing, no, Heartblock, you are not correct. There is a drop in traffic on the central section of EDG. Let me spell that out slightly more clearly.


Because of the traffic interventions that have been put in place, there is now less traffic on East Dulwich Grove than there was before. So everyone with the little green sign in their front garden is essentially asking for more traffic on their section of road.


Secondly - the 19% reduction is compared to something - the September 2019 count. When I last checked the interactive website then it was on there - so again, despite this being tiresome, yes it does exist and no you aren't right!


I'm now past the point where I think that any actual data would change your mind - however, the bit where you present things as fact is difficult to let slide, as people may not realise that your "facts" are not facts at all.

Regarding East Dulwich Grove central count - previous council reports have pointed out that the September 19 count from a ?comparable location? looked a bit low compared to the same ?comparable location? in January 19 and therefore they used the January 19 data instead to be more conservative. I don?t know where the comparable location is (presumably close?) and why was there such big swing in the count between January and September 19?.

goldilocks Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Dougie - try not to come on and mansplain.

>

> I've even given sources - because unlike

> Heartblock I'm a fan of that

>

> The data shared showed a fall on EDG Central -

> this is based on actual data, not made up.


There is no mansplaining in my post.

Plenty of it (and general condescension) in yours though which is just a bit odd given how misinformed you appear to be.

I think its just 'lazy' wording from the council though - like I say, there is data on the interactive map for September 2019 - which is the data that was referenced in the previous update too.


I think what it means is that there wasn't monitoring on that particular strip prior to September 2021, but the September 2019 data is very close by so its similar for comparison.


@Mrs D- the date of the January 2019 count included some days when the indi schools were still on Xmas holiday so the number would have been artificially deflated compared to average. The September 2019 number is the end of September so its normal term time traffic.


The fact that the comparison is September 2021 isn't fully helpful as the fuel crisis was starting to be felt at that point, and the January is after work from home but still quite close, so would still love to see the October / Nov / Dec data but if its in line with the other points then its interesting that traffic has decreased so substantially on that central section of East Dulwich Grove.

Anyone who actually lives in the area, especially on the roads impacted by the LTN can see an increase in traffic with their own eyes.


heartblock Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh look.....20% more traffic on East Dulwich

> Grove.... well obviously I wasn?t making it up!

> https://www.southwark.gov.uk/transport-and-roads/i

> mproving-our-streets/live-projects/streetspace/tra

> ffic-data-analysis

>

> Oh and also I was correct in this too ?No data

> collected for East Dulwich Grove Central prior to

> September 2021?

That Southwark data shows that in Goose Green ward the traffic has gone up massively. Its above pre covid levels here whereas everywhere else in London it is still down.


We warned time and again that LTNs displaced traffic and that it would be this side of Dulwich that would suffer it.


And the council data now proves those predictions right.


Remember when Mcash said if the LTNs don't work for everyone they would be removed? And now the data shows they only work for people West of Goose Green what has he done for his own constituents? Nothing at all.

heartblock Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Direct from the latest StreetSpace Southwark

> Council.


The dashboard contains data from 9 sites, where they've collected traffic data continuously from January 2021 to January 2022. It doesn't contain data from ED central prior to September 21. But if you look through the website you'll see that there is data which was collected in 2019. There is a full explanation of the methodology, including the location of data monitoring. See here: https://www.southwark.gov.uk/assets/attach/77419/FAQ-and-data-collection-methodology_Dulwich-Streetspace_Sept-2021.pdf

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Latest Discussions

    • Honestly, the squirrels are not a problem now.  They only eat what has dropped.  The feeders I have are squirrel proof anyway from pre-cage times.  I have never seen rats in the garden, and even when I didn't have the cage.  I most certainly would have noticed them.  I do have a little family of mice which I have zero problem about.  If they stay outside, that's fine with me.  Plus, local cats keep that population down.  There are rats everywhere in London, there is plenty of food rubbish out in the street to keep them happy.  So, I guess you could fit extra bars to the cage if you wanted to, but then you run the risk of the birds not getting in.  They like to be able to fly in and out easily, which they do.   
    • Ahh, the old "it's only three days" chestnut.  I do hope you realise the big metal walls, stages, tents, toilets, lighting, sound equipment, refreshments, concessions etc don't just magically appear & disappear overnight? You know it all has to be transported in & erected, constructed? And that when stuff is constructed, like on a construction site, it's quite noisy & distracting? Banging, crashing, shouting, heavy plant moving around - beep beep beep reversing signals, engines revving - pneumatic tools? For 8 to 10 hours a day, every day? And that it tends to go on for two or three weeks before an event, and a week after when they take it all down again? I'm sure my boys' GCSE prep won't be affected by any of that, especially if we close the windows (before someone suggests that as a resolution). I'm sure it won't affect anyone at the Harris schools either, actually taking their exams with that background noise.
    • Thanks for the good discussion, this should be re-titled as a general thread about feeding the birds. @Penguin not really sure why you posted, most are aware that virtually all land in this country is managed, and has been for 100s of years, but there are many organisations, local and national government, that manage large areas of land that create appropriate habitats for British nature, including rewilding and reintroductions.  We can all do our bit even if this is not cutting your lawn, and certainly by not concreting over it.  (or plastic grass, urgh).   I have simply been stating that garden birds are semi domesticated, as perhaps the deer herds in Richmond Park, New Forest ponies, and even some foxes where we feed them.  Whoever it was who tried to get a cheap jibe in about Southwark and the Gala festival.  Why?  There is a whole thread on Gala for you to moan on.  Lots going on in Southwark https://www.southwark.gov.uk/culture-and-sport/parks-and-open-spaces/ecology-and-wildlife I've talked about green sqwaky things before, if it was legal I'd happily use an air riffle, and I don't eat meat.  And grey squirrels too where I am encourage to dispatch them. Once a small group of starlings also got into the garden I constructed my own cage using starling proof netting, it worked for a year although I had to make a gap for the great spotted woodpecker to get in.  The squirrels got at it in the summer but sqwaky things still haven't come back, starlings recently returned.  I have a large batch of rubbish suet pellets so will let them eat them before reordering and replacing the netting. Didn't find an appropriately sized cage, the gaps in the mesh have to be large enough for finches etc, and the commercial ones were £££ The issue with bird feeders isn't just dirty ones, and I try to keep mine clean, but that sick birds congregate in close proximity with healthy birds.  The cataclysmic obliteration of the greenfinch population was mainly due to dirty feeders and birds feeding close to each other.  
    • Another recommendation for Niko - fitted me in the next day, simple fix rather than trying to upsell and a nice guy as well. Will use again
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...