Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Probably right. I also think it is a favourite with the ?Come into ED for the evening? crowd.


This is just an observation on my part and in no way xenophobic. If people are from, even as far afield as Penge and they have all their shots I?m fine with that. Just as long as they keep their hands off our women.

I believe they have also invaded the EDT and Bishop on the odd occassion.


I did witness one nearly colliding with a bus as she staggered backwards into the road waving her wine glass about. Even the driver honking his horn, as it were, didn't make much of an impact :-|


What's the world coming to!

I think the talking 176 is an attempt to solve the problem. You see they used to just get off the bus anywhere and wander around aimlessly bumping into things. Now it tells them where they are and where the bus is going. The problem is that Goose Green is in fact 3rd generation Pengelian rhyming slang for home(derived from the 17th century pensgrenne). So there is some confusion occurring and Black Cherry is cashing in.
Very well. Tudor Court rules it is then. Hmm, well perhaps if you set up a thread to be played in the lounge and watch closely it should become sufficiently clear for you to join in. Obviously becoming a decent player will take many years, and my own level of grand-master a lifetime of devotion.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Or increase tax.  The freezing of personal allowances is one way, not what I would choose.  On principle I don't care if the rich immigrate.  The main parties could have been more honest before the election.  Reform is deluded.
    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...