Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The way this thread is going you would think it was James Barber's idea to have a cinema in Lordship Lane, it wasn't the discussions were already under way long before he was even aware. He was previously in favour of a nursery on the site site and all he's done is ride on the back of the positive comments.


Read the thread from the beginning again.

Hi Arthur Facksake,

Yes and no. I've spoken to five cinema chains over the last 4 years. Blanked by one - Bermondsey Shortwave.

Other 4 initially very keen. Picturehouse have taken it forward and come up with this site. But I've discussed several other sites.

  • 2 weeks later...

Apparently Picturehouse Brixton offered to increase wages to the Living Wage over 20 months and it was turned down. Both Vue and Odeon's lowest pay grade is hovering just above the NMW (6.31 for 21+) and no-one is specifically calling for their admonition.


Ritzy's lowest pay grade is 7.24 and the offer was to increase it to 8.80 over what is a very tolerable time-frame and, indeed, a process sanctioned and promoted by the Living Wage Foundation itself. Ritzy's staff striking in these circumstances is as idiotic as it is selfish. If you condemn Picturehouse for not being progressive enough, I hope you stand ready to condemn all London businesses as there are only 214 employers who've signed up so far.


Yeah, let's really stick it to Picturehouse before we address the real villains of the piece.

Because why do they (comparatively well-off employees) deserve special public attention in view of the majority of people in the cinema exhibition business (not to mention those in equivalent jobs) who are considerably worse-off? Did anyone hide the rates of pay on offer before they came into work? Striking is a staggering overreaction in the circumstances.

worldwiser Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Because why do they (comparatively well-off

> employees) deserve special public attention in

> view of the majority of people in the cinema

> exhibition business (not to mention those in

> equivalent jobs) who are considerably worse-off?

> Did anyone hide the rates of pay on offer before

> they came into work? Striking is a staggering

> overreaction in the circumstances.


No, it absolutely isn't.


Just because lot's of people aren't earning the LLW it doesn't mean that they shouldn't be. Hopefully this will encourage others to take notice.


it's certainly got my attention and I didn't have a clue the number of businesses adopting the LLW was so low.


It's recommended level for a reason and anyone earning below it, particularly at the behest of wealthy national or multi-nation companies is entitled to a say.

worldwiser Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Did anyone hide the rates of pay on offer before

> they came into work?


And this is just pathetic. When young people are scratching around for any work they can get- as if they can be choosy up front.

What has this got to do with the exciting prospect of a new cinema in LL? Why are certain people hunting for excuses to rubbish this proposal?


Picture House aren't a workers co-operative and neither are Iceland. This has come as a major surprise to us all.

It of course has nothing to do with the exciting proposal which most people seem to have endorsed wholeheartedly.


Of course it's a staggering overreaction if only because Picturehouse already agreed to it! They just wanted a year and half to phase in the increase and I don't think that's too much to ask, especially at a time when hardly anyone has signed up to it. Picturehouse are to be applauded not vilified. You strike when you have absolutely no other option left in this world to get your employers to listen to you over a point of principle. This is so far from the case here that I have barely any energy to even acknowledge their supposed plight let alone support it. The Living Wage is without question a real and live issue deserving of our respect and industry should definitely sit up and listen to it. But adding 20% to the wage bill of an entire city's economy cannot and should not be expected to happen overnight. Employees who misuse their right to strike so totally as they have done here have done the cause a major disservice and deserve to be ignored in favour of people who only (or, god forbid, don't even) earn the NMW.


That's the end of the spectrum where the issue needs attention, not here where the issue is practically resolved. They got what they wanted and all they've done is act like petulant children who can't have their wish right away. Badly done Ritzy.

I can see how staff would be unwilling to wait a year and a half for a payrise. 7.24 an hour is kind of a pittance when you consider how much rents and the general cost of living in South London are rising year on year. The fact that many people are being paid less is of no consolation to anyone when they're on a take home wage of 13,194.98 a year from a 40 hour week, which really is not very much at all. I get paid a lot more than that at my 9 - 5 but still struggle financially. Ultimately workers have the right to strike if they find the conditions they're in unsuitable.
All places of work should pay a living wage or more. If any of the staff working at places in East Dulwich that don't pay it wish to strike, I support their right and decision to do so. Currently this discussion is about the Picture House chain of cinemas, so it's not unfair or singling them out to talk about their business practices.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Most bar staff will be on minimum wage, how is

> selling some tickets and a bit of popcorn any more

> of a skilled job deserving of higher wages?


Yeah, I guess you're right. Why even pay the buggers at all?


It's quite nice being able to earn enough money to put food in your mouth and a roof over your head. Regardless of skill, minimum wage is a pittance in this day and age. most people I know working in bars have to work several other jobs and pull double shifts just to keep their heads above water.


Though, more fool them and the bloody cinema staff to boot, should have chosen a job that required more skill and thus paid more eh? Bloody lay abouts.

And surely this thread is about the desirability of having a new cinema in ED and not about the desirability of firms paying the Living Wage.


For the avoidance of doubt, I fully support the principle of a Living Wage, a property tax or better graduated Council Tax (i.e. one in which people living in places such as Kensington Palace Gardens pay a darn sight more Council Tax than they pay at the moment) and a much higher top rate of tax. So I think that you could describe me as left of centre.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "Yeah, I guess you're right. Why even pay the

> buggers at all?"

>

>

> Stupid comment.

>

>

> I'm not saying it's a good situation, and that

> they all shouldn't be paid more. I'm simply saying

> that working in a cinema is no more difficult than

> bar work.


So what? Bars should pay their staff more too. What's your point?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Good morning, neighbours! We have around 1,000+ glasses like these from a café that just closed down. Not sure if anyone would like to keep some before we send them to charity. Please feel free to come and pick them up at 22 Upland Road, SE22 9EF anytime before 31st Oct😉    
    • What "stricter" consequences could there be for shoplifting (or any other crime) than being put into jail, do you think? Though our prisons are of course full enough already, without more people being shoehorned  into them.
    • Returning to the original question, I had my jabs at Tessa Jowell yesterday. I was early and I was  seen on time, and it was a lovely pharmacist who did them, but the admin beforehand (not by her) was a bit iffy. I was given forms to fill in but not told what to do with them afterwards, so I  presumed I had to take them into the consulting room, as the rest was supposed to be filled in by a clinician, but no! After some time had elapsed and I had found a seat (there was no information on where to sit either, so people were sitting in two separate areas, neither of which had many seats) my name was called and  the forms were taken behind the counter. Be aware if you don't have an appointment - even in the relatively short time I was there, three people turned up without appointments having been sent there by a GP (I presume) or having  previously been  asked by the pharmacy to come  back at a different time, and they were all sent away again because the pharmacy didn't have enough flu vaccine until the following day. I have no idea if this was due to a misunderstanding on the people's side, their GP's or the pharmacy's, but none of them were very happy, and one lady said she "couldn't keep coming back" 😭  At least one of them didn't seem to understand what he was being told, possibly due to a language issue. I felt quite sorry for the pharmacist, who was giving jabs all day on top of her usual workload but still managing to stay cheerful! Though she wasn't the one dealing with the unhappy people! I have a sore arm from the Covid jab (I chose to have the jabs in different arms), but no other ill effects so far, touch wood. 
    • Line speed and the strength of your Wi-Fi signal are two separate things.  The first is determined by the type of connection (fibre/copper etc) to the outside world and the second is the connection between the device (printer/TV/laptop/tablet etc) and the router. If you are connecting a device to the router using cables (as Alec1 is) then this is will give the best possible connection but isn't practical for many without a degree of upheaval and even then not all devices (tablets for example) will allow a wired connection. So you relying on the quality of the Wi-Fi signal from the router to the device and this will depend on the quality of the router, the type of Wi-Fi connection (the frequency), line of sight etc - many different things.  This is why some people opt for a "mesh" type setup which is supposed to give a solid quality of Wi-Fi signal around the house with little or no blackspots.  It's expensive though and still requires the devices that send and receive the signal (like the plug-ins you have) to be wired to the router.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...