Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Reminded me of a certain photograph of Peckham Rye Park, Sexby Gardens


KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Foxy that back alley looks ace, all that colour

> and thought and imagination, it's so positive and

> inspirational.

> Can't wait until ED gets a fair whack of that !

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Foxy that back alley looks ace, all that colour

> and thought and imagination, it's so positive and

> inspirational.

> Can't wait until ED gets a fair whack of that !


Well they've all ready started on the bins up outside the Herne so won't be long.


DulwichFox

MrBen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> johnie Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > DulwichFox Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> >

> > >

> > > There have been many road accidents where

> > > drivers were distracted by Graffiti.

> > >

> >

> >

> > I've looked quite hard on the web for evidence

> to

> > support this statement, but can't find any. Can

> > you point me towards the statistics? Thanks.

>

> Johnie, sadly even if Sir Lord Fox does bother to

> google...he often still gets it wrong. None of us

> really know where it all comes from...just take it

> as part of the entertainment round here..


I get so much stick when I give examples from Google.Search or Wiki. I left it up to you.


You have to read between the lines.

Distraction is one of the biggest causes of road traffic accidents.


This can be drivers using maps, mobile phones and in the States (USA) road side billboards (advertisements).

Also even people engaged in deep conversation.


It does not take a lot of working out that ANY roadside advert / unusual art work is liable to cause

a certain level of distraction and therefore increases the risk of an accident.


DF

Drivers are more distracted than ever before - and taking your eyes off the road for just 2 seconds increases accident risk 24 times


So driving passed a work of art and giving it a 2 second glance..


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3000917/Drivers-distracted-taking-eyes-road-just-2-seconds-increases-accident-risk-24-times.html

ruffers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I recall a poster featuring Sophie Dahl was

> accused of casing a few accidents a number of

> years ago. Is that what you were thinking of?


Not come across that before but a quick google :-


http://www.brandrepublic.com/article/12546/opium-poster-banned-record-complaints


It was Banned.


Protestors denounced the ad as ?porno chic? and degrading to women,

road safety campaigners feared that the posters could distract drivers and cause accidents, and councillors and parents complained that the ads were displayed too close to schools.

Read more at http://www.brandrepublic.com/article/12546/opium-poster-banned-record-complaints#MWMsdIBwjuRoSDql.99


Anyone who drives and/or has a tuppence worth of commence sense would be able to work that out.


DulwichFox

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Muley why do you think the murals are created by

> local people ?

> And if you mean the people who own the walls

> should check with their neighbours first before

> creating them, should that include passers-by ?

> If everyone likes the mural that a person creates

> on the side of his house, is he a tool ?

> If 15% do not like the mural that a person creates

> on the side of his house, is he a tool (or only

> 15% tool) ?

> Would respect for neighbours only be demonstrable

> in ED if there were absolutely NO murals, or only

> if there were murals that had gone up with 100%

> approval from 'the neighbours' (and please clarify

> if that includes passers-by) ?



Blimey KK, stick, wrong end, getting hold of...


DF wrote "Show some respect to your neighbours. Not everyone wants to live in a ghetto", to which I responded "Maybe 'show some respect your neighbours' by not being a tool". Really Foxy? You think ED is being turned into a ghetto? Do you feel that you are personally being disrespected?


KK, you asked 'Would respect for neighbours only be demonstrable in ED if there were absolutely NO murals, or only if there were murals that had gone up with 100% approval from 'the neighbours' (and please clarify if that includes passers-by).


Clearly Foxy thinks so.

MrBen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> When the Fox is on a sticky wicket...diversionary

> tactics are often deployed. In this instance we've

> just moved from graffiti to soft porn with Sophie

> Dahl.


Wrong again MrBen.. It was Ruffers that brought up Sofie Dahl.. Selective reading always lets you down.


DF

IngridB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

But they really

> would like another artwork there, so Im thinking

> about who to ask.


Ingrid, a possible suggestion - the calligrapher Seb Lester was asking for a mural space earlier this year. He does really beautiful typographic pieces - it's hard to imagine anyone not liking them.


He said: "I really want to do a big mural this year. A big piece of art, most probably a beautiful and inspiring quote, on a big wall somewhere. The location could be in the UK, or somewhere in Europe possibly. I'm thinking maybe roughly 3 metres by 6 metres. I would be grateful for any suggestions on where I could do that, legally obviously."

just_browsing Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So here is the Kinsale Road mural. More art than

> graffii, one might argue.


That's quite cool.. A hint of M.C Escher. The Dutch graphic artist. 17 June 1898 ? 27 March 1972


It's clever and incorporates the structure of the building with the illusion of depth..

One could believe it was real.


A lot nicer than that ghastly 'cartoon' bee. with its 'brash' colours.


There needs to be more consultation before any work is allowed to be carried out.


DulwichFox

  • 2 months later...
A female street artist is going to paint the wall where the bee was from 20 September for about 3 days. She is MadC, and the wall owners love what she proposes to do. It is based on another painting in Dulwich Picture Gallery. Lets hope people love it. I think they will!

Lovely. I appreciate that we have people organising all this art - i don't always love it, but I'm not supposed to. I went to the Summer Exhibition on Saturday and there was some very challenging 'art' (going for ?????) amongst some beautiful bits, buts that's my opinion not everyone's.


It's one thing having an opinion - that's what makes us all individuals. It's downright rude to hammer home time and time again (from the comfort of your keyboard), how much you despise something.


Thank goodness for IngridB and her artists - thank you! :)

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lets hope that this time the artist will use the

> correct paint that will not damage the wall's

> porousness

> requiring it to be re-rendered.

>

> DulwichFox


Whatever made you think that paint damages walls??? That particular wall has been in a very bad state for a long time. The owners think it was from when the house next to it (which is now a carpark) was bombed in the last war and an internal wall became an exterior.


The street artists in this project mainly use exterior masonry paint which actually protects the wall.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • OP has perhaps inadvertently provided free advertising for Dulwich Gails
    • Staff get taxis in and out and get paid extra (which I think is x2). Some people like to work on Bank Holidays and others don’t. Some people actively avoid Christmas for personal reasons. Long live freedom of choice! 
    • Here is another article from the excellent Special Needs Jungle (SNJ) with tips for responses to the SEND conversation survey. Including shoe horning in EHCPs which they "forget" to ask a question about in the conversation. And living as we do in Southwark with the huge misfortune of 100% academy secondary schools, some thoughts on this and how unlikely inclusion in mainstream is within the current education landscape. Closing date 14 Jan 2026. And please consider a donation to the excellent entirely run by volunteers SNJ. In my view the government could save money by creating some smaller mainstream secondary schools for kids who can cope in primary school but not  with the scale of secondary, and need a calmer less busy setting. The funding would have to be different - it is currently on a per pupil basis which favours larger schools. But it would undoubtedly be cheaper than specialist provision, and the huge cost to individual children and families (emotional and financial) and to society. https://www.specialneedsjungle.com/tips-help-complete-governments-send-conversation-survey-law/ If anyone wants to take a radical step to help their struggling child, my tip is to move far away: these are the best two schools I have ever visited and in a beautiful part of the country. I only wish we'd moved there before it was too late for my son who had to suffer multiple failings at Charter North and then at the hands of Southwark SEND, out of education from February to October in year 10-11, having already suffered the enduring trauma of a very difficult early life, which in combination with ADHD made his time at schools which just don't care so very unbearable for all of us. https://www.cartmelprioryschool.co.uk/ https://settlebeck.org/ As an add on, I would say to anybody considering adoption, please take into account the education battles that you are very much more likely to face than the average parent. First you have schools to deal with, already terrible; then being passed from pillar to post within Southwark Education, SEND, Education Inclusion Team, round and round as they all do their best to explain why they are not responsible and you need someone different, let's hold another multi-agency meeting, never for one minute considering that if they put the child at the centre and used common sense they would achieve a lot more in much less time without loads of Southwark employees sitting in endless meetings with long suffering parents. It is hard to fully imagine this at the start of your adoption journey, full of hope as you are, but truly education is not for the faint hearted, and should be factored into your decision. You'll never hear from people who are really struggling and continue to do so, only from those who've had challenges but overcome them and it's all lovely. And education, the very people who should be there to help, are the ones who make your lives the most hellish out of everything your child and you face.
    • It’s a big problem all over London. I’ve seen it happen in Kennington and Bloomsbury in the last year. I think there has been some progress recently with some key arrests, but you do need to be very careful when walking around with your phone out, especially, as you say, if wearing noise cancelling headphones. Sorry you experienced this 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...