Jump to content

Recommended Posts

numbers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I daren't look. I can barely complete the

> (algebra) homework belonging to my friend's 7yo.


I had to endure Algebra, Quadratic Equations, Simultaneous Equations at school and again

in Technical College.


WHY ???


In 40 years working in Telecommunications.. Systems Networking I never needed to use any of it.


Who does use it. ??


Foxed.

I did 1968 papers except for English language and Maths which I did in 1967. I failed English Literature in 1968 (what's the point of analysing fiction?)

Anyway, in answer to DulwichFox- that basic algebra mentioned above is just the foundations of higher algebra and that is the basis of computer graphics, computer-assisted tomography, mechanics e.g. projectiles; there are umpteen applications underpinning the technology we all take for granted these days.

There was no standard passmark in those days, it was done by percentages, so

you were competing against your fellow student. I heard a headmaster saying

recently that to do that now would not reward teachers/students, but is that

the point?


Why exactly do we grade ? what does society get out of grading students at school ?




BB100 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You can't really compare 'hardness' of o'level to

> GCSE unless you know what the pass mark is for the

> papers.

Naaa both N and S have a really big city, but total sq mileage is much smaller in the N.

Simple maths equation really ;-)


Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Surely Geography No.2 Q.5 is more to do with

> history than geography.I like the English

> composition options. Quite a variety. Are exams

> anything like this now?

it always annoys me when people talk of A levels and GCSEs allegedly becoming easier. I found A levels ridiculously difficult, my first year at university was a breeze in comparison. i think more and more schools are now teaching directly from past exam papers rather than from a wider topic related approach, students are then bound to do well but at the expense of not really understanding the subject beyond an exam paper.

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There was no standard passmark in those days, it

> was done by percentages, so

> you were competing against your fellow student.


xxxxxxx


I did O levels in 1965, and my recollection is that there were passmarks?


They were graded A B C D E (for passes), and I thought A was over 70% etc?


If not, surely grades would vary depending on the quality of the student cohort (is that the right word?) in a particular year in any particular subject?


I have a totally crap memory though so I may be completely wrong.

It always ended up as about 70% - but in our board (WJEC)

it definitely moved around.


Nobody really knew how it worked - but I was always told

they expected the same statistical distribution of marks

- and that depending where the 'peak' was they could adjust

the grade boundaries (assuming the exam was easier/harder and

students the same)


Edit: so,yes, if you got a good year - you were unlucky.



Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > There was no standard passmark in those days,

> it

> > was done by percentages, so

> > you were competing against your fellow student.

>

>

> xxxxxxx

>

> I did O levels in 1965, and my recollection is

> that there were passmarks?

>

> They were graded A B C D E (for passes), and I

> thought A was over 70% etc?

>

> If not, surely grades would vary depending on the

> quality of the student cohort (is that the right

> word?) in a particular year in any particular

> subject?

>

> I have a totally crap memory though so I may be

> completely wrong.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The lack of affordable housing is down to Thatcher's promoting sale of council properties. When I was working, I had to deal with many families/older folk/ disabled folk in inferior housing. The worst ones were ex council properties purchased by their tenants  with a very high discount who then sold on for a profit. The new owners frequently rented out at exorbitant prices and failed to maintain the properties. I remember a gentleman who needed to be visited by a district nurse daily becoming very upset as he rented a room in an ex council flat and shared kitchen and bathroom with 6 other people  (it was a 3 bed flat) the landlord did not allow visitors to the flat and this gut was frightened he would be evicted if the nurse visited daily. Unfortunately, the guy was re admitted to hospital and ended up in a care home as he could not receive medical help at home.   Private developers  are not keen on providing a larger percentage of 'social housing' as it dents their profits. Also a social rent is still around £200 plus a week
    • Hello, I was wondering if others have had experience of roof repairs and guarantees. A while back, we had a water leak come through in our top floor room.  A roofer came and went out on the roof to take a look - they said it was to do with a leak near the chimney.   They did some rendering around the chimney and this cost £1800 plus £750 for scaffolding (so £2,550 total).  They said the work came with a 10 year guarantee. About a year later, there was another leak on the same wall, which looked exactly the same size and colour as the previous leak. But it was about 2 metres away from it, on the other side of a window.  I contacted the roofer about this new leak, thinking it would be covered by the guarantee. However, he said the new leak was due to a different and unrelated problem, and so was not covered by the guarantee. This new leak, he said, was due to holes in the felt underneath the tiles. He said there are holes in the felt all over the roof (so if this was the cause, I expect the first leak may have been caused by that too - but he didn't mention the holes in the felt for the first repair). It feels like the 10-year guarantee doesn't mean much at all.  I realise that the guarantee couldn't cover all future problems with the roof, but where do you draw the line with what's reasonable?  Is it that a leak is only covered if an identical leak happens in exactly the same place?  There were no terms and conditions with the guarantee, which I didn't question at the time.  
    • I always like Redemptions coffee though I've not visted for awhile..Romeo Jones was always my 1st choice for takeout Coffee Redemption 2nd. What IS with all these independent Yoga and Pilates Studios? Theres one on London Rd in Forest Hill (Mind) thats recently opened and then theres the Pilates place thats opened on North X Road. I looked at the prices of the one on NorthX road and was frankly shocked at how expensive it is, The FH one is slightly less.  Made me decide to stick with classes in The local authority gym
    • Dulwich Village update: The old DVillage location is (again?) under offer. The storefront next to the new grocer is going to open as a yoga and pilates studio...the name of which I've forgotten. 🤦‍♂️  Megan's is starting to push its takeaway coffee and cannibalise some of Redemption Coffee's market share. Is Megan's struggling? It's quite a big restaurant they have and rent cant be cheap. The reinventing of the Megan's branch on Lordship Lane as Ollie's seems to have stalled. And Redemption is looking a bit tired these days...
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...