Jump to content

Recommended Posts

That is exactly why I have them. I have more control of my bike when I am attached to it esp when pulling away. Your feet don't slip or move on the pedals allowing me to get out of the way of traffic as quickly as possible.

I generally use brakes to stop.

I have pedals that are SPD on one side and flat on the other so makes life easier I guess but SPDs are so easy to click in and out of that I barely notice myself doing it..

jimbo1964 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Where in ED were those taken? The second blur

> particularly impressive.


It's Smithfields meat market.


Lots of issues around Holborn - it's very dangerous for everyone

so I bet the cyclists try and avoid it.

JohnL Wrote:

> It's Smithfields meat market.


One of them is. The other - the blur - is, appropriately enough, on the pavement outside Bart's hospital. Yes, it's a wide pavement, but there's also quite a lot of pedestrian traffic on it, it's a good cut through from St Paul's/Holborn to Clerkenwell, plus there's an entrance to the hospital there. However, King Edward St is one way, so you regularly get idiots cycling on the pavement. A friend of mine who works nearby was hit quite badly last year on the precise spot that photo was taken, and called a c*nt for his trouble.

Another blur this morning. Just past the guy with the trolley is the Lycra Lout who actually clipped my elbow as he shot past from behind. I yelled at him to cycle on the road, his answer was "Well don't walk in the middle of the fcuking pavement then". So now we have to give way to the selfish w4nkers? At 6:30am when the road is near-empty? Lovely.

This is the point that Lady D and others ignore (and I speak as a cyclist who has a young child who else cycles).


Pedastrians have priority on the pavement. It's common sense that dictates this, as well as the law, and any cyclist who goes on the pavement must respect that.


Cyclists who behave like a fish describes give all the rest a bad name, but think it's ok because of the massive chip they have in their shoulder. I agree totally with Lady D about the need to have much better provision for cyclists, but until then pedastrians get priority on the pavements.


I used to work on St Johns st, just north of the market, and totally back up a fish's description of cyclists around there. What really annoys me about incidents like he/she has is the way the cyclists never stop to discuss what happens, just swear at us and ride off. Cowards.

I've lived in this area a long time and I can honestly say that I have not seen people cycling along the pavement in ED. If they have been, then they have clearly been doing so carefully enough that I have not had reason to notice them. Whilst I agree that no one should be cycling along the pavement, I'm genuinely amazed that it is such a regular problem for some people on here.

titch juicy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Cyclist and bus had a coming together outside

> peckham rye station this morning apparently. Only

> details I know are that he wasn't wearing a helmet

> and there was a crowd of paramedics present.


He was wearing a helmet and looked in a bad way

kenand Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> titch juicy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Cyclist and bus had a coming together outside

> > peckham rye station this morning apparently.

> Only

> > details I know are that he wasn't wearing a

> helmet

> > and there was a crowd of paramedics present.

>

> He was wearing a helmet and looked in a bad way


apologies- typo on my part, meant to write he WAS wearing a helmet and it probably saved his life


this is very much anecdotal though

On one occasion I had a No. 12 driver race and over take me down the south 1/2 of Peckham Rye. Very purposefully he gunned around me slammed in front braked hard and stopped at his next pick-up. Poor him (and long suffering you lot) he didn't kill me or knock me off my bike. His job unfortunately made me the "winner" of his lethal game. In a city, a cyclist enjoying the fresh air and great outdoors, more often than not leaves a driver with many horses beneath his bonnet in the dust.

Glad to hear that he's alive - I thought he was under it


All the buses had stopped and everyone from the shops was on the street as I walked up.


titch juicy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> kenand Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > titch juicy Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Cyclist and bus had a coming together outside

> > > peckham rye station this morning apparently.

> > Only

> > > details I know are that he wasn't wearing a

> > helmet

> > > and there was a crowd of paramedics present.

> >

> > He was wearing a helmet and looked in a bad way

>

> apologies- typo on my part, meant to write he WAS

> wearing a helmet and it probably saved his life

>

> this is very much anecdotal though

Townleygreen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> my old Dad used to always ask pavement cyclists if

> they did it because their Mum wouldn't let them

> cycle on the road.


I do that sometimes, in fact I did it a few days ago. I think he told me to 'buck off front' though I may have misheard him.

kenand Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> He was wearing a helmet and looked in a bad way


He did have a helmet, my sympathies to the guy, hope he's okay now - he was in a lot of pain.


As far as I could see (was also cycling, but a lot further up the road) he came off near a slow moving or stationary bus, but I don't think that caused the accident. It looked like he either collided with the bin lorry flanking the bus, or possibly a person stepped out in front of him. I heard the noise before looking so missed the split second of the collision.

a fish Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Today's @$$holes. Number 2 nearly clipped me, and

> is cycling past a sign saying 'cyclists dismount'.


Nobody around - seems safe enough to me.


I do think this thread has been going on long enough, surely these pictures are a sign we need to stop.


On to more interesting topics I think.


Now, how is that M&S coming on at Iceland site????

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I thoroughly recommend Jay from JK Electrical Contractors who is an NICEIC registered. NICEIC is the UK's leading certification body for the electrical contracting industry and conducts regular audits and assessments on all its members. It is the specialist trade body which certifies professional electricians.  Jay completed the installation of a 19 way consumer unit for us and works to the highest standards and our entire electrical installation is now fully compliant with 18th Edition of the electrical wiring regulations. Before installing the new CU he traced and corrected faults that had developed over the last 25 years -some of which were my DIY bodges that were non-compliant.  We now have an installation that is 100% safe and  reliable . His contact details are :- 0208 150 6450 [email protected] Here is what he installed for us.
    • I fully support this petition, however it will need to be shared far & wide to be effective. Also there is always a huge amount of interest / objection during the festival, but not so much when they start consulting for the next one, usually around January. It's crucial that everyone that has been impacted makes their voice heard then.  A couple of points which may be good to include in the wording (if it is still possible to amend?) - The total tickets sold are way more than 3000. The licence allows a capacity of up to 9,999, but this may include staff & performers etc. The published attendance for 2024 was:  Friday – 8,999 / Saturday – 9,512 / Sunday – 9,422 So that's c.28,000 people trampling & littering our park over three days - people who have no need or desire to take any care or consideration of our park.  - Gala claim for 2024 that "62% of all ticket holders were from Southeast London and 18% of these were from hyper-local postcode areas SE15 and SE22." So a bit of maths shows that means that around 89% of attendees were not what most people would term 'local'... - Gala have ambitions / plans to extend the number of event days to 6, over two weekends. They applied for a licence for this in 2024, but then withdrew it. Instead they added a "free" event, billed as a community day, to the existing 3 day festival, thereby increasing the event days to 4.  This would appear to be an attempt to set a precedent for increasing the number of event days, and it's inevitable that they will attempt to secure the 6 days they desire for 2026, to increase their profits further. Two weekends in a row of noise, disturbance & disruption would be unacceptable, plus an extra c.18,000 trampling & littering the park... - The site size has been increased. The claim is that it is to compensate for lost storage space due to recent flood alleviation works, but the area has increased by more than the area lost, and appears to have been used for attendee activity rather than site storage. Gala have often stated that the festival can only be located in the park because the footprint has been designed specifically for that area, and yet this year the footprint had been amended & extended without any apparent issues. Surely this proves that it could be relocated?  Apologies, I just can't help going into rant mode on this issue, but hopefully some of the above may be helpful in increasing the argument presented by the petition?
    • Best to just get in touch with the council. You need to see what works were approved and the scope.  It's probably advisable to get an independent legal survey (not a standard RICS) and look at current condition, what they said they'd fix, if they did what they said and what the problems are with what they did. Was it just your flat and the other flat mentioned? Asking in case there's any other leaseholder/ tenant involved  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...