Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Following on from D_C's post re. the CPT. I think this warrants its own thread.


The Fair Pint Campaign


Supporting tied landlords and consumers


24,000 of Britain?s pubs are tied to PubCos. Even though tied landlords can buy cheaper beer - they are tied to the PubCos for their supply.


?Tied pub landlords must buy all of their beer and some other supplies from the PubCo.


?Consequently the consumer is usually paying a significanly inflated price for a pint of beer, and tied pub landlords are being forced to sell beer at a loss.


?Around 27 pubs a week - just under four a day - are closing


Write to Tessa.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/3631-the-fair-pint-campaign/
Share on other sites

Indeed he is. Having been PM-ing him over the last few months I'm up to speed on the issues (roughly).


The Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Select Committee announced this week they are to have a formal inquiry into the PubCo industry - mainly due to the pressure from Scor46's campaign.

Update


This past week Fair Pint has moved from the national trade press into the mainstream. A mention in the Telegraph and two half pages in Evening Standard by Simon English in the finance section: "New blow for pubs as MPs roll out a probe".


The early day motion (EDM 1328) has fifty signatures now; Ted Tuppen, CEO of rather large PubCo Enterprise called the MPs who have signed the EDM 'moronic' when speaking to city analysts about three weeks ago. So I emailed them all to point out his wise words.


Three licensees and several people who live in the Camberwell / E Dulwich bounds are responsible for this, quite frankly, historic campaign.


Oh yes and the Business Enterprise Committee has announced that it will re-investigate the PubCos this Autumn.


Have you ever tried to 'roll out a probe?' Ooh er missus.

  • 3 weeks later...

One could say the same of EDMs. Many do.


Don't shoot the messenger (Tom Steinberg et al's implementation of the 'e' in e-petitions). Considering this came out a tiny NGO operating on a teeny-weeny shoe-string, I think its impact has been fairly astonishing.


If the govt. does not sit up and take note, that's another matter. The government can't be forced to do anything, but as an exploration of new ways of interacting with/presenting public concerns to the government of the day it is no bad thing. And somewhat of a step forward from handing boxes of paper over to some minion in Downing Street.

Well the petition was never the real aim.


The BERR Select Committee hae re-opened the inquiry into PubCos and if all goes well the OfT could do the same. That's the important, decision-making bit.


And louisiana is certainly correct in her assumption that EDMs are rather a waste of time yet MPs sign hundreds each year and they are spoken of in the press as some great parliamentary procedure when they're nothing of the sort.


Best bet if you want to support this campaign is to write to your MP expressing support for the campaign.


There is another/joint campaign currently running out of the All Party Parliamentary Beer Group highlighting the cultural importance of the great British Pub. So, all is not lost.....


Hopefully Mark or scor46 can update us with more details soon. Best of luck guys.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The stop outside the chippy was still closed earlier today, although the barriers I saw yesterday have been removed, so no need for the closure.  The stop outside the church across the road is now uncovered and open
    • You all have different and conflicting interests though. It isn't necessarily appropriate for him to communicate with all of you at the same time about the same issues.    You're giving more away with each post as to how these difficulties probably arose. 
    • @CPR Dave He needs to communicate collectively with all of the beneficiaries.  That is the whole point of my original post.  Electronic communications are the best way of doing this, as I am doing now on this forum.  Apart from the gold digger who will get a six figure sum the rest of us are on four figures, and that is going down by the day. I'm offended by any suggestion that we are not behaving well.  What on earth do you mean?  
    • Surprise, surprise. It didn't take them long, did it. This will be something of a test as to how much the council really care about parks and the environment. A footfall of 60,000. Are they mad? There is no way this park is designed for or can sustain that sort of use. Just had a look at the schedule. If allowed to go ahead, this will involve a large slice of the park (not the common) sectioned off and out of use for three weeks of May and the first week of June. Here's an idea, why not trial the festival in one of the other Southwark Parks, so the 'goodness' can be shared around the borough?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...