Jump to content

Recommended Posts

ChavWivaLawDegree Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I used to do the sexual freedom march back in the

> day with persons of every kind of sexual identity

> proudly marching together.

>

> I still want a chav pride march tho.


Chav, by that argument we should just have a 'Tribe Pride' march, with everyone of every class marching proudly together, wearing their tribal colours of Burberry jackets (vintage post-1998) or Burberry jackets (vintage pre-1998) or whatever. But to be honest, it doesn't sound as much fun..

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/3634-chav-pride/#findComment-113462
Share on other sites

oooh I dunno - potential for even more fun!


That said - tribes don't interest me at all. I may be easily classifiable at the moment but I'm sure if enough people do so loudly enough, I would shape-shift and materialise as something else (with the same values. of course. they are not for negotiation)

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/3634-chav-pride/#findComment-113466
Share on other sites

Last year I flew with Thompson Airways and I have to say that I would christen that Airline


"Chav Airways" as it was basically full of them... so my suggestion for your parade is to just hang around at the arrival gates of Gatwick, wait for Thompson to arrive from Mah-Ga-Loft or similar and parade with them all as they come out...


Fake tans a necessary addition as it will blend in nicely with their 'redness' or peeling skins


also don't forget to carry a DOM-KEI(That is how they pronounce it, talk really slowly and loudly so that you can be understood anywhere in the world and have a dozen screaming kids under each arm...


Why go out of your way to fund a parade when there are at least 40 a day already taking place at this time of year....

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/3634-chav-pride/#findComment-114096
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
    • Niko 07818 607 583 has been doing jobs for us for several years, he is reliable, always there for us, highly recommended! 
    • I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...