Jump to content

Recommended Posts

*Bob* wrote:- So stick that in your childless pipes and smoke it.



The correct term seems to be child 'free' these days, I was so informed by PeckhamRose



Think of putting the word 'child' and 'free' in the same sentence is ridiculous

they obviously have no idea of the costs.

Essentially, if you're already convinced that children making your life boring before you've had them, then you are destined to be a boring parent.

Children should fit in around you, not you around them - as far as is possible.


Happy parents = happy children.

Miserable, resentful parents = miserable, resentful children.

Why the fuck do we now need a pc term for people who choose for whatever reason not to have children. As far as I have always known this is a completely fucking normal and acceptable fucking path to fucking choose whatever your fucking reasons fucking are. For the fucking sake of all the fucking gods! You?re all completely fucking brain-free.


fucking Edit: fucking

Absolutely *Bob*


The advantage of having your own kids is that you can say 'sod off and leave me in peace' to watch the golf, read the paper, get drunk/stoned etc.


with other peoples you are expected to behave in a certain way,

eg walk in to a different room and slamming the door behind you will have a similar effect,


unless they are simple, and if that is the case, you never invite them back.


Your own kids do as they are told or risk a battering, until you feel better, that is why your own are easier than the ones you borrow and give back.

Considering that my childhood seemed to consist of washing dishes, mowing lawns, washing cars, fetching drinks etc. etc. I can?t wait to have kids so that I can put my feet up for a few years.


How many do you think I will need to be completely free of housework?

Moos - the term I use is child 'free' and not child 'less' is that the term 'less' seems to imply that there is something missing and that the lack of children is not a choice. Someone who is home'less' has probably not put themselves into that situation willingly. I suppose someone who wanted children but who couldn't have them would feel child'less' because there was something lacking in their life. Child'free' however indicated that there is a choice - which in my case and in many others there is.


I am 100% sure that many parents have wonderful lives and enjoy their time with their children and I think that is fantastic. I am also 100% sure that parenthood would not suit me. I don't think that children would make my life boring, I personally think children would make my life insufferable. That's me, that's my choice.


Incidentally if someone had started a thread called 'why having kids is the worst thing ever' I wonder what the reaction would have been.

Yeah, quite right I wouldn't know. I'm only thinking about it. The people that get annoyed with comments like my earlier post tend to be the ones that contradict themselves by having a pop - some deeper issues there.


Cassius - "Some people just simply cannot accept that others are different to them" - I'm obviously different to you - ACCEPT IT.

Cassius - ?and what about people who CAN'T have children - you've basically damned them for a physical fault? ? Stop jumping to conclusions, I didn?t damn anyone, the only thing that?s damned is your mind for coming up with the daftest accusations.


Jah Lush ? ?How the @#$%& would you know??? So what?s your point? Do you have kids? If not, then HOW THE @#$%& WOULD YOU KNOW?


VeryBerryCherry ? ?It sounds like heaven on earth. Imagine..............of it?


I personally would plan well in advance if I were to have kids. I most certainly would not take the selfish attitude you have, It?s all me me me bull. When you have kids you have to be willing to make sacrifices and I'm sure having kids is more rewarding than having a good old pissup everyweek when i'm 43.

I see your point, Cassius - and I wholly agree with your principle - but give me another example where 'free' is used in a non-pejorative way. The complement to your 'not having kids is a good choice for some' is 'having kids is a good choice for some'. To me, 'child-free' reads that children are in themselves a bad thing, a hindrance. Since children are just young human beings, I think that's rather unpleasant - although of course I know that you don't mean it that way.


If someone had started a thread called 'why having kids is the worst thing ever' that would be terribly sad. I think someone raised the point that having children is not a good thing for everyone that has them a few pages back - largely for people who have them unplanned, but I guess sometimes also for planned children whose parents weren't expecting what they got. I can understand that the title thread might grate on people who don't want to have kids!

MelbourneGr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> VeryBerryCherry ? ?It sounds like heaven on earth.

> Imagine..............of it?

>

> I personally would plan well in advance if I were

> to have kids. I most certainly would not take the

> selfish attitude you have, It?s all me me me bull.

> When you have kids you have to be willing to make

> sacrifices and I'm sure having kids is more

> rewarding than having a good old pissup everyweek

> when i'm 43.



Well, good for you.


Maybe you should get your head down and start planning now, instead of standing up on your sanctimonious perch judging mine and others decisions for not wanting children. Who the $%&* are you to judge if my decision is selfish or not? You don't know my reasons any more than I know yours for wanting kids.


All I was trying to point out, was that there are as many benefits to having kids as to not. Each to their own.


I think you, or I, may have missed the point ot this thread, I assumed was for people to share those thoughts and reasons, NOT to start laying charges at the feet who have made the decisions they have made.

Moos - I see where you are coming from and you make a very good point, but I think the whole 'free' and 'less' distinction simply comes from whether or not there is a choice in the lack of children in the life, I have never thought of it being insulting or of it implying that children are a hindrance.


It seems that some people doth protest too much. If you want kids - have kids, if you don't then don't, but why try and imply that one way is the right way for all of us. I don't want to go out on piss-ups, spend my money on long-haul holidays or plasma tv's, I simply don't want the 24/7 life long obligation to be a good parent and take on the responsiblity of another life.

It seems that some people doth protest too much. If you want kids - have kids, if you don't then don't, but why try and imply that one way is the right way for all of us. I don't want to go out on piss-ups, spend my money on long-haul holidays or plasma tv's, I simply don't want the 24/7 life long obligation to be a good parent and take on the responsiblity of another life.


Quite right and fair. (although I do want kids, and piss-ups ;-) ).


RE: The whole free / less thing, I'm with Brendan, I just don't get why people worry about this sort of thing at all!

So you aren't free to babysit on Friday then?


I think we are going to have to amicably shake hands on 'free' and 'less'. I'm not going to repeat myself and bore everyone.


Edit - that was for Cassius, not Keef... although come to think of it, if you're available..

VeryBerryCherry Wrote:


> All I was trying to point out, was that there are

> as many benefits to having kids as to not. Each to

> their own.



You contradict yourself again? So why the abuse? I honestly don't get it.


This highlights a point that I initially didn't see when positing originally. People that don't have kids, whatever their age, can only make assumptions or express opinions on this subject. This does not mean that people with differing views should start frothing at the mouth, jumping up and down and writing all kinds of abuse at someone when they see something they don't agree with.


This leads me to my next point - this is a forum and opinions will be expressed which may sound totally crazy to someone else, but instead of attacking someone and building up a crazy picture (i.e. sanctimonious perch - are you for real?) try questioning someone's points constructively. You'll get a much better understanding.


Finally - I made a point that a few people took as a personal attack on themselves. I never implied ONCE that not having kids was a bad thing or 'not proper'. It's a lifestyle that I personally thought would be boring.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • This reminds me of a situation a few years ago when a mate's Dad was coming down and fancied Franklin's for Christmas Day. He'd been there once, in September, and loved it. Obviously, they're far too tuned in to do it, so having looked around, £100 per head was pretty standard for fairly average pubs around here. That is ridiculous. I'd go with Penguin's idea; one of the best Christmas Day lunches I've ever had was at the Lahore Kebab House in Whitechapel. And it was BYO. After a couple of Guinness outside Franklin's, we decided £100 for four people was the absolute maximum, but it had to be done in the style of Franklin's and sourced within walking distance of The Gowlett. All the supermarkets knock themselves out on veg as a loss leader - particularly anything festive - and the Afghani lads on Rye Lane are brilliant for more esoteric stuff and spices, so it really doesn't need to be pricey. Here's what we came up with. It was considerably less than £100 for four. Bread & Butter (Lidl & Lurpak on offer at Iceland) Mersea Oysters (Sopers) Parsnip & Potato Soup ( I think they were both less than 20 pence a kilo at Morrisons) Smoked mackerel, Jerseys, watercress & radish (Sopers) Rolled turkey breast joint (£7.95 from Iceland) Roast Duck (two for £12 at Lidl) Mash  Carrots, star anise, butter emulsion. Stir-fried Brussels, bacon, chestnuts and Worcestershire sauce.(Lidl) Clementine and limoncello granita (all from Lidl) Stollen (Lidl) Stichelton, Cornish Cruncher, Stinking Bishop. (Marks & Sparks) There was a couple of lessons to learn: Don't freeze mash. It breaks down the cellular structure and ends up more like a French pomme purée. I renamed it 'Pomme Mikael Silvestre' after my favourite French centre-half cum left back and got away with it, but if you're not amongst football fans you may not be so lucky. Tasted great, looked like shit. Don't take the clementine granita out of the freezer too early, particularly if you've overdone it on the limoncello. It melts quickly and someone will suggest snorting it. The sugar really sticks your nostrils together on Boxing Day. Speaking of 'lost' Christmases past, John Lewis have hijacked Alison Limerick's 'Where Love Lives' for their new advert. Bastards. But not a bad ad.   Beansprout, I have a massive steel pot I bought from a Nigerian place on Choumert Road many years ago. It could do with a work out. I'm quite prepared to make a huge, spicy parsnip soup for anyone who fancies it and a few carols.  
    • Nothing to do with the topic of this thread, but I have to say, I think it is quite untrue that people don't make human contact in cities. Just locally, there are street parties, road WhatsApp groups, one street I know near here hires a coach and everyone in the street goes to the seaside every year! There are lots of neighbourhood groups on Facebook, where people look out for each other and help each other. In my experience people chat to strangers on public transport, in shops, waiting in queues etc. To the best of my knowledge the forum does not need donations to keep it going. It contains paid ads, which hopefully helps Joe,  the very excellent admin,  to keep it up and running. And as for a house being broken into, that could happen anywhere. I knew a village in Devon where a whole row of houses was burgled one night in the eighties. Sorry to continue the off topic conversation when the poor OP was just trying to find out who was open for lunch on Christmas Day!
    • We went to Chern Thai for lunch on Saturday, as we have done quite often, and they were closed, with no sign of life. The sign in the window still says Saturday 12-3, and there was no indication that they would be closed. Can anybody shed any light? We went to Chilli and Garlic on Zenoria Street instead. Their falafel salad bowl is amazing (and amazing value!) but we had been looking forward to a Pad Thai and a pint of Singha! ETA: I am reviving this thread because it is/was  specifically about Chern Thai's opening times! 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...