Jump to content

Recommended Posts

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ooooooh big congrats to all concerned. Can't

> believe you nicked Rory though. Back to the

> drawing board!!!!


I have to say the name Rory gets mixed reactions MP - especially from the mother in law (not so keen on irish names it seems). But I have always liked it and its going to be more mainstream if rory mcilroy keeps up the good work!

Were either of you new / 2nd time Dads in Mon petit cafe today about Noon? A tall woman was with you and you carried tiny lickle baby in a carry thing like a back to front rucksack (can you tell I am not a parent?) I was too shy to ask you to identify yourself!

As my the little one sill have a Spanish surname an Irish first name is non negotiable it would seem.

I like Rory, apart from being a good solid name, because a)it's also Scottish where my mums side are from and b)people can spell it.


Girls names not so good, Briony (I've some welsh a little ways back) was rejected so only unspellable ones remain.

Aoife and Niamh are front runners.

I reckon if the former I'm going to register her as Eva in her Spanish passport. If the english struggle, Spaniards REALLY will not get it!!


Anyhow, big congrats again.

  • 3 weeks later...

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Congratulations to Weegee whose baby is here.

> Jessica Charlotte born on 29th December @ 1315.

> Weighing 7lbs 8ozs.

>

> Can't wait to see the photos Weegee x



ah bless you Ladymuck


Yes all good here. Both Franster(Mum) and Jessie are doing fine and resting at home!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I see a gap in the market and a stall in North Cross Road...
    • The lack of affordable housing is down to Thatcher's promoting sale of council properties. When I was working, I had to deal with many families/older folk/ disabled folk in inferior housing. The worst ones were ex council properties purchased by their tenants  with a very high discount who then sold on for a profit. The new owners frequently rented out at exorbitant prices and failed to maintain the properties. I remember a gentleman who needed to be visited by a district nurse daily becoming very upset as he rented a room in an ex council flat and shared kitchen and bathroom with 6 other people  (it was a 3 bed flat) the landlord did not allow visitors to the flat and this gut was frightened he would be evicted if the nurse visited daily. Unfortunately, the guy was re admitted to hospital and ended up in a care home as he could not receive medical help at home.   Private developers  are not keen on providing a larger percentage of 'social housing' as it dents their profits. Also a social rent is still around £200 plus a week
    • Hello, I was wondering if others have had experience of roof repairs and guarantees. A while back, we had a water leak come through in our top floor room.  A roofer came and went out on the roof to take a look - they said it was to do with a leak near the chimney.   They did some rendering around the chimney and this cost £1800 plus £750 for scaffolding (so £2,550 total).  They said the work came with a 10 year guarantee. About a year later, there was another leak on the same wall, which looked exactly the same size and colour as the previous leak. But it was about 2 metres away from it, on the other side of a window.  I contacted the roofer about this new leak, thinking it would be covered by the guarantee. However, he said the new leak was due to a different and unrelated problem, and so was not covered by the guarantee. This new leak, he said, was due to holes in the felt underneath the tiles. He said there are holes in the felt all over the roof (so if this was the cause, I expect the first leak may have been caused by that too - but he didn't mention the holes in the felt for the first repair). It feels like the 10-year guarantee doesn't mean much at all.  I realise that the guarantee couldn't cover all future problems with the roof, but where do you draw the line with what's reasonable?  Is it that a leak is only covered if an identical leak happens in exactly the same place?  There were no terms and conditions with the guarantee, which I didn't question at the time.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...