Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Someone chopped our bush with an axe just outside our garden (it grows through the fence)- we reported it to the police who said they would send someone round from the Safe Neighbourhood Scheme - it's now a week later and we have not seen anyone. We are not bothered about the bush (we made this clear on the phone to the police) but we are bothered about someone feeling able to be destructive in a public place. Low level vandalism needs to be nipped in the bud (forgive the pun) - just like the Mayor of New York said 'Zero tolerance is the way to go'. What if we were a 'vulnerable' couple relying on the police for support? What then?
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/37475-low-level-vandalism/
Share on other sites

You are legally required to trim your bush so it doesnt grow outside your boundary fence/wall.


I have been provided numerous flyers over the years stating you would be fined by the council if they had to do it for you.


I am not saying this "vandalism" is right, but it is likely you have pi$$ed someone off by not trimming your bush and they have taken it into their own hands.


I am not surprised the Safe Neighbourhood Scheme hasnt stopped by. Stick to the rules, and all will be fine.


Zero tolerance to those lazy hedge trimmers too?

More likely that you've annoyed someone by letting it grow out onto the pavement than someone has vandalised you. Not saying it's right to do that, but if it is the case that it it has been left to grow, causing the pavement outside your house to be significantly narrowed, then that would be annoying to anyone who needs to use the pavement.

giggirl Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> More likely that you've annoyed someone by letting

> it grow out onto the pavement than someone has

> vandalised you. Not saying it's right to do that,

> but if it is the case that it it has been left to

> grow, causing the pavement outside your house to

> be significantly narrowed, then that would be

> annoying to anyone who needs to use the pavement.


xxxxxxx


If it was growing a long way out, then I agree.


Trying to get a double buggy past that kind of obstacle, or even a couple of kids walking holding your hands, without having to go onto the road, could be hard.


Mind you, I'd have thought a polite note through your door might have been preferable to their taking matters into their own hands!


But if somebody was wanting to engage in low level vandalism for the sake of it, I'd have thought there were "easier" ways than fetching an axe and chopping at a bush (I refuse to engage in low level innuendo :) )

I did once threaten on the EDF to chop peoples' bushes if they overhang the pavement because I am sick of having to avoid getting my eyes poked out and/or being forced into the road when out for a walk- but I haven't done any yet. There has always been low level vandalism around here.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • People already have....
    • Thankyou so so much tam. Your def a at angle. I was so so worried. Your a good man, we need more like your good self in the world.  Thankyou for the bottom of my heart. Pepper is pleased to be back
    • I have your cat , she’s fine , you can phone me on 07883 065 076 , I’m still up and can bring her to you now (1.15 AM Sunday) if not tonight then tomorrow afternoon or evening ? I’ve DM’d you in here as well 
    • This week's edition of The Briefing Room I found really useful and impressively informative on the training aspect.  David Aaronovitch has come a long way since his University Challenge day. 😉  It's available to hear online or download as mp3. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m002n7wv In a few days time resident doctors -who used to be known as junior doctors - were meant to be going on strike. This would be the 14th strike by the doctors’ union since March 2023. The ostensible reason was pay but now the dispute may be over without more increases to salary levels. The Government has instead made an offer to do something about the other big issue for early career doctors - working conditions and specialist training places. David Aaronovitch and guests discuss what's going on and ask what the problem is with the way we in Britain train our doctors? Guests: Hugh Pym, BBC Health Editor Sir Andrew Goddard, Consultant Gastroenterologist Professor Martin McKee, Professor of European Public Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Mark Dayan, Policy Analyst, Nuffield Trust. Presenter: David Aaronovitch Producers: Caroline Bayley, Kirsteen Knight, Cordelia Hemming Production Co-ordinator: Maria Ogundele Sound Engineers: Michael Regaard, Gareth Jones Editor: Richard Vadon  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...