Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Been in patch and flying pig today. Both quiet, went to Gowlett quiet but also good. And Mickey Flanny was in there holding court. MontyP was great.


Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> But pricing to choose your customer is normal.

> Think Mayfair hotel bars and Bond Street shops.

>

>

> There is an economic theory on this that I vaguely

> recall from University.

>

> Help me out someone, something to do with diamonds

> and the pricing of attraction.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> unlurked Wrote:

> -------------------------------------------------->

> That's true, but also there comes a point when you

> (meaning I) don't want to drink in certain places

> because of the gentrification.


> > Make a stand. The fools with the cash also

> accept

> > crap service and quality in these pubs.

>

> xxxxxxxx

>

> True - but then why would you want to drink there

> too and accept crap service and quality at

> inflated prices?


Ah, but I complain about the service etc when poor.

I still want to demonstrate that I won't be priced out or poor qualitied out of my local pubs and make a point of going regularly enough for them to know I'm still around!

I went to The Patch on NYE. Food very good but front of house, whilst friendly, was quite disorganized - mainly the communication between FOH and the kitchen. We fed this back to the manager who acknowledged there had been issues and apologised. I get the feeling they are teething issues rather than fundamental flaws and would certainly return for dinner.


It's good to have an alternative to Franklins and The Palmerston (which seems too inconsistent) in the area.

Never understood the concept of Teething Troubles...


When you spend 6 months + sorting the place out. (Priority given to hideous graffiti on outside.)


Get in a 'Top Chef' ??


Then employ inexperienced staff. (NOT their fault)


Then charge top restaurant prices???


Same old ED Story..


Not been many reports good or bad since they opened.


Have been passed several times for a nose(21.00-21.30) No one in front bar. 6 people in dining area...??


Walk past the Palmerston at that time it is often packed.


Something not quite right.


Might pick up in the summer when the weather is warmer. Old Mag was always a cold place.


DulwichFox

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Never understood the concept of Teething

> Troubles...

>

> When you spend 6 months + sorting the place out.

> (Priority given to hideous graffiti on outside.)

>

> Get in a 'Top Chef' ??

>

> Then employ inexperienced staff. (NOT their

> fault)

>

> Then charge top restaurant prices???

>

> Same old ED Story..

>

> Not been many reports good or bad since they

> opened.

>

> Have been passed several times for a

> nose(21.00-21.30) No one in front bar. 6 people in

> dining area...??

>

> Walk past the Palmerston at that time it is often

> packed.

>

> Something not quite right.

>

> Might pick up in the summer when the weather is

> warmer. Old Mag was always a cold place.

>

> DulwichFox



Agree whole heartedly. Teething probs is a shite excuse. The place is not, and never will be up to scratch due to too many 'partners' and a make as much money as poss attitude, rather than service and earned profit.

I just feel the need to comment that anyone quoting The Patch as having 'top restaurant prices' has obviously never been in a Top restaurant or even a fairly average West End restaurant for that matter.

Go and have lunch for Two at Liberty Department store in the west end for instance-with mediocre food and characterless waiting staff and it will actually cost more for two courses and wine per person that Lunch at The Patch.

I know this as I have done both in the past Few weeks.

I find it tedious when people bleat on about prices-you can either afford to eat somewhere or not.

And make your dining choices accordingly.

I am a normal working woman who eats out on special occasions and I appreciate that a decent meal will certainly involve expenditure outside my usual budget.

I don't think anyone on here has compared it to West End prices NewWave. I could be wrong of course but I can't be arsed to go through the entire 15 pages of this thread again to check. It's the ?4.40 for a pint of Guinness and ?16.00 for a fecking fry up that gets my goat.


Is it a pub that does food or is it a restaurant with a bar? I don't think even the owners can answer that one.

Not being a beer drinker I can't comment on the cost of a pint however I DO agree that ?16 for breakfast is extortionate.

I must confess I initially thought of it as a restaurant but having actually visited the place the layout and feel is more like a pub with a restaurant at the back.

I would add that although the food is superb I also felt that the place lacked an identity in terms of interior design.

which also added to the feel of it being a pub with food attached.

Agree the interior design definitely needs tweaking. Looking on the dining area from the bar it appears to me a bit like a school dinner hall or works canteen. I intend to eat there soon and hope that the food is as superb as you say it is. I've certainly no qualms about the wine list. ;-)

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Agree the interior design definitely needs

> tweaking. Looking on the dining area from the bar

> it appears to me a bit like a school dinner hall

> or works canteen.


xxxxxx


Is the restaurant part laid out like the Mag(nolia) was, then? Because that always seemed like a quite bare and characterless eating area to me.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> But pricing to choose your customer is normal.

> Think Mayfair hotel bars and Bond Street shops.

>

>

> There is an economic theory on this that I vaguely

> recall from University.

>

> Help me out someone, something to do with diamonds

> and the pricing of attraction.


It's known as a "veblen good" where the higher the cost, the more desirable it becomes. This is in opposition to the more common and widely understood "law of demand". Luxury goods drop in demand if their price falls since they are no longer deemed to be exclusive. So diamonds, rolls-royce etc. The Patch isn't quite in that league.


Rather, the Patch could be seen as a "positional good" in that it's value is derived from it's desirability rather than a comparison to other goods on the market.


It's not that the food is any better than anywhere else, but for some people, paying ?16 for a fry-up will make them feel like they are getting something exclusive. And to an extent they'd be correct in that only a limited number of consumers are willing to pay that.


Always wondered when that economics a-level would come in handy.

The rest of the menu for lunch and dinner - see above on this thread is actually very reasonable. I wouldnt get too hung up on the fact they've gone off whack on this breakfast option. Also it seems they dropped their main menu prices in November after getting initial feedback. As many others have said its only in line with ToasteED, Franklins and Palmerston.


I'm with NewWave that its boring hearing the same old negative moaners complaining about prices. A few have had it in for this place from the start for no obvious reason apart from it not being the bygone era of strippers and warm pints of bitter for ?2.50 like it did back in the 1980's. Jah has given a fairly balanced view thus far - and if he likes the wine list that scores serious points with me. The food is also fantastic - why not try it rather than moan?

Have they got more beers in? When I went in after opening (but before they started serving food) they had a pretty uninspiring selection, and yeah, on the pricey side. But maybe they are more focussed on the wines? The service was also extremely casual and the space a bit cold and soulless. Which hasn't encouraged me to try the food tbh, but will do at some point.
Mr Ben is spot on in that there has been a persistent bunch of moaners who haven't even stepped through the doors yet. If you must moan about it, do so from experience. I want the place to be successful as I'd hate another pub in the area to close down and turned into flats.

...and if we just go over the border to SE5 we could add just off the top of my head, sad but i guess inevitable


...the Denmark

The Athanueum

The Orange Tree

The Admiral Codrington

The Windmill

...and one up Camberwell New Road on the right whose name escapes me


...and I am sure some more

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • @Sue said: nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? This is the point. Adults are meant to teach their children by example. It sounds as though the adult guardian/ father in this case did not react appropriately. Had a truly sincere apology been given,  I suspect the OP would not have posted on here. It is possible the OP snapped in the heat of the moment, but they were possibly startled because they were hit from behind? If we are startled it can be instinctive to initially react with anger. I also agree that it would be highly irresponsible to let any very young child ride or walk or do anything on a busy public street without supervision- most of all to protect the child. If in this case the child was out of the adult's line of sight that is perhaps another indication that the father needs a refresh in appropriate behaviour around a child, as well as his manners.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
    • How long is a piece of string? AI was a bit rubbish on this one, but Checatrade : average cost to paint a house exterior is around £30 per square metre So depends on the size, access, time to put up scaffolding and cost of hiring and building that, surface preparation, and quality of materials.   Checkatrade put it at £2.5 k for average semi, that sounds a little cheap.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...