Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I have always found the B and B on Upland Road to

> be of the highest quality and cleanliness.

>

> Do they want this post removed.


everyone knows its not an actual hotel/b&b. also, there's never been any trouble from there. I wish people would leave it alone.

numbers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> everyone knows its not an actual hotel


Three people on tripadvisor would disagree.



It's just an anecdote - about tripadvisor and it's irrelevance to local matters. I have nowt against the place.

sorry *bob* hadn't properly read the thread, didn't realise your post linked to the 'b&b'.


have seen some hilarious responses to obviously fake/whining/putting boot in type reviews on TA from management. Sad they have to take time to deal with it but guess thats price you pay for publicity these days, good or bad.

I have never been in *that place that shall never be named". Nor have I ever returned to *the other place* after my foccia horror. I have however revisited * the unamed charitable outlet where breast feeding is verboten* several times.I still fear the backlash from the proprietor of *the soft furnishings and tat emporium* after an ill judged public comment some years ago, so have never entered the shop again. Though I do relish pressing my face against the window and gurning on saturday afternoons.

numbers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> sorry *bob* hadn't properly read the thread,

> didn't realise your post linked to the 'b&b'.

>


And of course I haven't stayed there. Just in case that wasn't clear either numbers.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> numbers Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > sorry *bob* hadn't properly read the thread,

> > didn't realise your post linked to the 'b&b'.

> >

>

> And of course I haven't stayed there. Just in case

> that wasn't clear either numbers.


it was clear Mick Mac, I knew you were joking. Am sorry for my rather grumpy and unnecessary post on this otherwise funny thread!


four pounds is the funniest thing I've read on here for ages. love it.

  • 3 weeks later...

My thoughts are that if one has had a bad experience then one should be able to freely discuss that experience. Likewise with a positive experience. If we only reserved space for those who had nice things to say then every establishment would have a gleaming reputation. I am all for the calling out of bad places (i.e The Cherry Tree) but likewise, I'm all for the calling out of great places (i.e Blackbird Bakery).


As someone pointed out prior, if an establishment isn't happy because people are being 'mean' towards them, the answer is simple: change what you're doing. And I'm certain there are a lot of places within ED that need to buck up their ideas (I can certainly name a few). They should take it as criticism and do their best to improve for the benefit of their customers but also their business.


As a side note: someone mentioned The Cherry Tree and quite frankly I'm in awe that such a place is still conducting business. The operations that go on in that place are on rocky grounds with regards to the legality of it all. I once worked a 7 hour shift and was informed that no breaks are allowed and I also received cash in hand, having been told that "my national insurance contributions are paid by the owners" - a likely story. I was also not given full payment for the work that I did there and was constantly under anxiety as a result of being under the watchful eyes of the owners at all times whilst having to put up with their awful attitudes, their racism, sexism and downright rudeness towards customers. It's a shambles and an embarrassment. It's exploitation and, truthfully, you should all avoid this place.

Admin - could these names be reinstated once the Defamation Act (2013) comes into play?


It is aimed at reducing the UK's targeting for libel tourism, but has a clause about opinions being fine if clearly stated as an opinion and not aimed at causing serious harm to rhe reputation of the business.


Surely commenting on a terrible meal or some bad service doesn't quite warrant that? Especially as this is the EDF and hardly the front cover of The Sun.


For reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defamation_Act_2013

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Whilst I agree, I have been thinking about this recently in relation to some of the other posts on here about anti social behaviour. We are all products of our upbringing - our experiences at home, school and beyond - plus whatever we have inherited genetically which might affect our behaviour (the nature/nurture thing). So in this case, if people haven't been brought up to love and appreciate trees and other wild things, plus as you say they may be deeply unhappy (or have other undiagnosed issues) it's easy to see how they could have ended up doing this. Also, it's possible they had quite low intelligence and didn't really grasp what they were doing and the effect it would have on so many other people. But that's just surmise and possibly completely wrong. From what I've read about it, they seemed to be two mates egging each other on, like two big kids. I'm not for a minute excusing what they did, and it's right they should be punished, but I really hope they might get some sort of rehabilitation in prison (it would  be appropriate to have them do some kind of community service like planting saplings, wouldn't it, or working in woodland conservation). And the same goes for phone robbers and shoplifters (rehabilitation, not planting saplings), though for SOME  shoplifters there might also be other issues at play, not excluding poverty. Sorry Jasonlondon,  I've gone off at a real tangent here, lucky it's in the lounge! Oh oops I've just noticed it isn't. Sorry admin. Oh, and then there's a whole philosophical discussion to be had about free will and determinism ..... 🤣🤣🤣
    • Thanks! I'll find out in a few weeks when I get the results! It was one of those disconcerting things where a disembodied voice keeps booming  at you to breathe in and hold it, then breathe normally. Apart from that it was OK, all completely painless. I imagine there will be quite a few people going from ED, though I presume it covers the whole Southwark area 
    • Two men behind ‘senseless’ felling of Sycamore Gap tree jailed for more than four years Good to see these two jailed today for four years. There’s something deeply disturbing about people who destroy trees—any tree. Whether it’s a centuries-old landmark or a sapling in a quiet park, trees are living beings that offer beauty, shade, and life. The men who cut down the Sycamore Gap tree are a stark example of how far some people will go to lash out at something peaceful and meaningful. People who harm nature like this aren’t just destructive—they are often deeply unhappy. It takes a troubled mind to look at a tree and see something to ruin instead of something to protect. Read more here  
    • What a brilliant idea. I hope it went OK, Sue. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...