Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Has anyone had their service charge for 2012/13 which includes a charge for block lighting and electricity ?.This is really a charge for electrical testing and inspection of electrics in the communal areas.The council are insisting that this is a charge for leaseholders but at present are unable to tell me what was tested,the area involved is about 10'by 5' in a terraced house the charge is half of ?452 i.e.?226. Could anyone also tell me if it is easy to go to the Leaseholders Valuation Tribunal.

Thanks

Hi


First, some links with information:

http://www.justice.gov.uk/tribunals/property-chamber


Firstly, before you get to LVT you should try and get to the Housing CAB. They could help you bring any case you have. Also try going directly to the Home Ownership Unit on Abbeyfield Road in Bermondsey, make an appointment with a name on your invoice.


I recently did this and challenged and invoice wanting an extra ?2000 off me, and they admitted they had over charged me nearly a thousand pounds of it! They so very nearly got away with it.


And very importantly the Leaseholders Association of Southwark are having a meeting at 7pm at Pasley Tenants and residents Association, Stopford Road, London SE17. I urge all Southwark Leaseholders to come along and also join LAS. LAS is all run by Volunteers and so if you have any time, or skills you can offer, they/we would be very grateful as some very experienced and helpful members of the Committee are now resigning and organisations like this do need more input from us.


Hope some of this helps. PM me with your email address and I shall forward you a PDF file being LAS's latest newsletter.

fredbear Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> although they have said the work has been done

> they are unable to send a report or a

> certificate.

> thanks



Get your local Cllr to put your questions to them via a Cllrs inquiry and also get your MP to do the same via a Members inquiry.


You will be surprised just how quick they respond. All inquirys are logged and have a time limit in which a response is required.


No Council Officer likes getting such a request which is flagged to managers


Any charge ask for a complete break down. dont take no for an answer


The LVT is a last result

stephen509 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sounds about right for a electrical report.

>

> You are paying for elecrical report & certificates

> needed.


this was not the whole house just the entrance lobby with two light switches plus incoming main which has been covered over.

Hi all,


I recently emailed the council to question this charge too, and this is the response I got:


To clarify the term block is used by Southwark to define the building in which your property is within. So whether it be a flat within a large storey block or a flat within a Victorian house the definition is known as a block.


The block lighting charge was invoiced to leaseholder following an electrical testing that took place to street properties borough wide. I have copied below some further information in regards to the electrical testing work.

To comply with the Electricity at Work Regulations (EWR), Periodic Electrical Installation Testing is carried out at recommended intervals to ascertain the electrical installation is still in a satisfactory condition and hence is safe to leave in service

Landlords and Employers have a legal responsibility to comply with the EWR, and could be prosecuted in the event of an incident, if it was seen reasonable practicable steps had not been undertaken ( Testing being seen as a practicable step). Evidence of the testing of electrical installations is seen as a high risk issue in fire risk assessments

The main purpose of Electrical Periodic Testing is to detect so far as reasonably practicable, any defects impairing or likely to impair safety of the installation

? Safety of persons against the effects of electrical shocks & burns

? Protection against damage to property by fire and heat arising from an installation defect

? Confirmation that he installation is not a danger or deteriorated so as to impair safety

? Identification of any non-compliances, or installation defects which may give rise to danger

LAS have not responded to two of my letters even with SAEs.

I think they are overwhelmed and their expert-volunteer base is a bit low as some are retiring.


So I would suggest turning up to their Meeting as advised above in my earlier post.

Ask not what your LAS can do for you but what you can do for LAS2000!


They ARE useful and have done some incredible work in identifying where Southwark Council vastly over charges service charges and so on, but they're not miracle workers and they need new people to come and support and help them do their work for the benefit of all Southwark Leaseholders.


Just sayin'.

midivydale Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> We have also been presented with the above bill

> and I fully intend to dispute it.

> Many Thanks PeckhamRose for posting the details of

> the next meeting. Can we just come along?


don't just email the person at the top of your bill go further up the chain.

Yes you can come along. Just turn up and then join. I can't remember how much it is to be a member or joint member but I think it is about ?15. Which ain't bad considering they saved me so much in the past with their knowledge and advice!


But as for the 'chain', asking to speak to the name on the invoice IS a good idea, which is what I did and asked a lot of informed questions, hence they then went back to the people they had to get back to and later told me they had made a mistake to the tune of nearly ?1,000.


Look up the eighteen month rule. I'll try and come back about that later.

LAS (Leaseholders Association of Southwark)

meet at

7.00pm

at

Pasley Tenants and Residents Association

Stopford Road

London SE17


on


Thursday 28th November 2013

at 7.00pm.


This group as I said is run by volunteers who have built up great skills and contacts with the Council over the years but not many new people join or help out.

They need new members with skills and a bit of time to help out.


Hope to see you there.


Do send me a private message with your email address so I can email you a PDF file of their latest newsletter.

I've also had this charge for electrical repairs, and likewise recollect the work taking very little time. I'm unable to attend the LAS meeting but if this issue is discussed, please could someone post the outcomes here? I would be happy to join a group response to these charges if that's the most effective way of getting them reviewed.

Thank you, particularly Peckham Rose for the info about the LAS and next meeting.

thanks spider69 they have supplied a visual report sheet which must have taken all of 5 mins but they cannot supply a test certificate which should be available if testing has taken place.For the amount of money they have charged it should be quite detailed.The entrance hall only cosists of 2 light switches 2 lights and a boxed in mains cable.
  • 2 weeks later...

A reminder that TONIGHT 7.00pm Thursday 28th November 2013 is a meeting of Leaseholders Association of Southwark. If you are not a member JOIN there at the meeting. I can not remember how much it is a year or for joint membership but anyway come and learn how things work at LAS and the council.

VENUE Pasley Tenants and Residents Association Hall

Stopford Road London SE17.

The following should assist if the link works!


View Larger Map

Has anyone had any luck with challenging this?


Southwark have now provided photos and a checklist, plus a bill for ?450 for the check and ?120 for 'income supply enclosure'.


Apart from saying: 'That's really expensive for half an hour's work', I feel like I don't have much of a case to argue, but wondered if anyone else was getting anywhere?

verds Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Has anyone had any luck with challenging this?

>

> Southwark have now provided photos and a

> checklist, plus a bill for ?450 for the check and

> ?120 for 'income supply enclosure'.

>

> Apart from saying: 'That's really expensive for

> half an hour's work', I feel like I don't have

> much of a case to argue, but wondered if anyone

> else was getting anywhere?


we have had to pay the bill but are still chalenging it.james barber has contacted the council on our behalf.we are still trying to get proof of testing.they have sent us a visual report but the date did not fit in with swanns testing.the more people who write the better

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Direct link to joint statement : https://thehaguegroup.org/meetings-bogota-en/?link_id=2&can_id=2d0a0048aad3d4915e3e761ac87ffe47&source=email-pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogota-breakthrough&email_referrer=email_2819587&email_subject=pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogot_-breakthrough&&   No. 26 | The Bogotá Breakthrough “The era of impunity is over.” That was the message from Bogotá, Colombia, where governments from across the Global South and beyond took the most ambitious coordinated action since Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza began 21 months ago. Convened by The Hague Group and co-chaired by the governments of Colombia and South Africa, the Emergency Conference on Palestine brought together 30 states for two days of intensive deliberation — and emerged with a concrete, coordinated six-point plan to restrain Israel’s war machine and uphold international law. States took up the call from their host, Colombian President and Progressive International Council Member Gustavo Petro, who had urged them to be “protagonists together.” Twelve governments signed onto the measures immediately. The rest now have a deadline: 20 September 2025, on the eve of the United Nations General Assembly. The unprecedented six measures commit states to:     Prevent military and dual use exports to Israel.     Refuse Israeli weapons transfers at their ports.     Prevent vessels carrying weapons to Israel under their national flags.     Review all public contracts to prevent public institutions and funds from supporting Israel’s illegal occupation.     Pursue justice for international crimes.     Support universal jurisdiction to hold perpetrators accountable. “We came to Bogotá to make history — and we did,” said Colombian President Gustavo Petro. “Together, we have begun the work of ending the era of impunity. These measures show that we will no longer allow international law to be treated as optional, or Palestinian life as disposable.” The measures are not symbolic. They are grounded in binding obligations under international law — including the International Court of Justice’s July 2024 advisory opinion declaring Israel’s occupation unlawful, and September 2024’s UN General Assembly Resolution ES-10/24, which gave states a 12-month deadline to act. UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the occupied Palestinian territory Francesca Albanese called them “a momentous step forward.” “The Hague Group was born to advance international law in an era of impunity,” said South Africa’s Foreign Minister, Ronald Lamola. “The measures adopted in Bogotá show that we are serious — and that coordinated state action is possible.” The response from Washington was swift — and revealing. In a threatening statement to journalists, a US State Department spokesperson accused The Hague Group of “seeking to isolate Israel” and warned that the US would “aggressively defend our interests, our military, and our allies, including Israel, from such coordinated legal and diplomatic” actions. But instead of deterring action, the threats have only clarified the stakes. In Bogotá, states did not flinch. They acted — and they invite the world to join them. The deadline for further states to take up the measures is now two months away. And with it, the pressure is mounting for governments across the world — from Brazil to Ireland, Chile to Spain — to match words with action. As Albanese said, “the clock is now ticking for states — from Europe to the Arab world and beyond — to join them.” This is not a moment to observe. It is a moment to act. Share the Joint Statement from Bogotá and popularise the six measures. Write to your elected representative and your government and demand they sign on before 20 September. History was made in Bogotá. Now, it’s up to all of us to ensure it becomes reality, that Palestinian life is not disposable and international law is not optional. The era of impunity is coming to an end. Palestine is not alone. In solidarity, The Progressive International Secretariat  
    • Most countries charge for entry to museums and galleries, often a different rate for locals (tax payers) and foreign nationals. The National Gallery could do this, also places like the Museums in South Kensington, the British Library and other tax-funded institutions. Many cities abroad add a tourist tax to hotel bills. It means tourists help pay for public services.
    • Having just been to Co-op to redeem a 50p off Co-op members' card voucher on an item that is now 50p more than it was last week, Tesco can't come soon enough
    • Surely that depends on the amount.  It can be quite piffling.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...