Jump to content

southwark council service charge


fredbear

Recommended Posts

  • 5 weeks later...
At last we have had the over payment charged to us on the Major Works for 2005/06.Southwark have had this money since the work was completed in 2009 not a word of apology or any interest on this large amount of money.If we had owed them money they would have charged interest.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Scaffolding the largest ammount,repair stonework,brickwork,window repairs,repair slate roof(it is new)decoration (done last major works),surveys.At this time it is only estimated until a survey is done i have asked to be there.

We also within the total estimate of the contract have to pay for a flag pole,mobile phones,health and safety signage,a residents refuge and identity cards plus other items.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Thats a top tip, Fredbear. The one thing that helped me was taking photos of everything that they are 'repairing' as its visual proof they can't dispute, both before and after shots. It's the only thing that has saved me with a few of the repairs they listed. That and witnesses.


Re the 'surveys' they aren't real surveys. I spoke to an insider off the record. It's a man standing on the ground saying that your house exists. Then they send out that S20 with everything on there, assuming it all needs doing. Its a total show survey as they missed alleged subsidence and a giant hole to the rear of the property on my surveys. They then put the onus back on you to dispute at the S20 stage.


They also make you pay the estimate, not an actual charge. For some reason, they are very cagey about the actual charges. Can't think why?




fredbear Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Try and get before and after photographs and make

> sure you ask for a complete breakdown of the bill

> listing all the work done and charged for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thats true Robinson15 with our last major works which finished 5 years ago they made us start paying the estimate approx ?8500 AFTER WE HAD PAID ?2700 I complained the final bill was ?1800.We are now waiting for the bill for the current major works estimate ?4700.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I am told that the Divisional Manager of Homeownership/Leasehold Management has parted company with Southwark and the combined parts that made the department an integrated one stop shop has had its services and management farmed out to other departments. So instead of a dedicated department for leasehold matters they will now I expect have to take on other duties.


I.e.If Service Charges come under the remit of an income collections department it is likely that something like rent collection will be one of their functions. How Service Charges and rents are like for like remains to be seen.


All other services Major Works for example have been put under the management of other departments.


I wish you luck in trying to sort things out. It can only get more frustrating.


Perhaps Cllr Barber could explain more

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't forget. There is the Tier One Tribunal where you can contest these charges. Always fight them. They have nothing but contempt for tenants and leaseholders alike. There is something rotten at the core of Southwark's housing department and it needs to be challenged big-time now.


As for Councillor Barber - and I'm not bashing councillors here as I do think they are amazing in that they usually have to hold down a job as well as doing what they do by giving up their spare time, and he does give that time to engage here ? but all he will say is 'Buy the freehold'. But it's often not possible if others in your block or house don't want to or you don't have ?10,000 to spare. He's living in la la land, really, where everyone is monied, I'm afraid.


And as for Mike Balfour, the council manager expressing his shock/horror here about what's going on, he's known very well how things are, going right back to the days of the cowboys Botes, who went into administration eventually. And the company before that was dreadful too. Not to mention Morrisons after them. Disaster. I have to say, though, that in most instances Mike did act whenever I contacted him, so he's genuine to some degree. And brave and decent of him to come on the forum, to be honest. He and I have a love/hate relationship, as you might have gathered...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

got our copy of the breakdown of resposive repairs


1 repair 3 handles on downstairs tenents windows ?80

2 repair two roof leaks only one was done ?80

3 scaffolding tower for above (we believe they used a ladder and went over the roof) ?400

4 overheads ?120


now we have to query costs but only 2 weeks left before payment

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I am quite baffled about the actual service charge which was issued on 24/09 and then a reminder letter sent on 12/10. The estimated service charge was ?96.45 and the actual is ?609.83 so in total I am required to a difference of ?568.60. My property is a one bed first floor flat in a converted Victorian Terrace. The property downstairs is council owned. I have not had any work on my flat undertaken by the council.


The council are just about to start major work (painting windows and front of the houses) on the row of Victoria houses in the street, the cost of this over ?6000.


Can anyone advise how I can challenge the recent service charge bill?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have spoken to my neighbour from downstairs and he has not had any work done or called the council out. However prior to him moving in the flat was completely refurbished due to the previous tenant causing substantial damage to the property- he was growing cannabis and the property was not habitable. So would I be liable to pay 50% of the cost for them renovating the flat?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't read through all the pages here but just wanted to say that I took Southwark to the LVT over service charges and now pay none.

The council fought me all the way and were incredibly obstructive and as a result it was a tedious and time consuming process but for me had a good outcome.

during the process all sorts of ridiculous charges that the council couldn't back up at all were discovered so it is worth keeping on it and insisting for clarity and information - not something they were willing to give..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It was an absolute shit show. And so much anger coming from both sides, not becoming at all (was surprised how riled cool Rishi was getting).  Agree about the format, it was lazy, whatsherchops wasn't asking pertinent questions, she was just going for binary yesses or nos. The producers didn't force either side to drill down on anything, just make commitments so they got good soundbites.  If I hear 'my father was a tool maker' / my wife's a nurse / my father was a GP one more time... as if any of those things qualify anyone to fix / understand anything. 
    • Good.  Subsidence claims generally have an excess of £1000 per claim, but was yours higher?
    • Indeed, many house here have had or will have subsidence issues so one needs to bear that in mind.  Many houses here have shallow foundations but they have been around 100 years or so without too much issue. What the surveyor has told you doesn't feel like a 'red flag', more of a sensible warning.  Bear in mind that although the surveyor is nominally working for you, their focus iln reality is mostly on the lender and the risk of being sued, either by them or you.  So they are always pretty cautious.  It would be wise to get a 2nd opinion, eg. from a structural engineer.  Or talk  to the original surveyor directly as they may say more than they are prepared to put in a report.  It's a little difficult from the description to identify what the situation is but the scenario in which part of a property has been underpinned and the rest has not is fairly common here.  The proximity of trees is likely to be the main thing to be concerned about, particularly after the hot summer of 2002, as insurers generally regard them as risky, especially if they are not cut back from time to time.  A second surveyor can advise directly on this. It would definitely be worth trying to take over the current buildings insurance.  Indeed, it may be quite hard to find new cover.  Enquire what the current premium is and who the policy is ultiimately underwitten by (ie. is it a name that you have ever heard of?)  The insurance industry, in general, works to a guideline that the insurance of an underpinned property should transfer to a new owner.   https://www.biba.org.uk/insurance-guides/home-insurance-guides/subsidence/
    • More than the 2 contestants, the format and production was the main fault last night - allowing 45 seconds for an answer will get you those responses from any 2 candidates Awful show
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...