Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 5 weeks later...
At last we have had the over payment charged to us on the Major Works for 2005/06.Southwark have had this money since the work was completed in 2009 not a word of apology or any interest on this large amount of money.If we had owed them money they would have charged interest.
  • 1 month later...

Scaffolding the largest ammount,repair stonework,brickwork,window repairs,repair slate roof(it is new)decoration (done last major works),surveys.At this time it is only estimated until a survey is done i have asked to be there.

We also within the total estimate of the contract have to pay for a flag pole,mobile phones,health and safety signage,a residents refuge and identity cards plus other items.

  • 1 month later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Thats a top tip, Fredbear. The one thing that helped me was taking photos of everything that they are 'repairing' as its visual proof they can't dispute, both before and after shots. It's the only thing that has saved me with a few of the repairs they listed. That and witnesses.


Re the 'surveys' they aren't real surveys. I spoke to an insider off the record. It's a man standing on the ground saying that your house exists. Then they send out that S20 with everything on there, assuming it all needs doing. Its a total show survey as they missed alleged subsidence and a giant hole to the rear of the property on my surveys. They then put the onus back on you to dispute at the S20 stage.


They also make you pay the estimate, not an actual charge. For some reason, they are very cagey about the actual charges. Can't think why?




fredbear Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Try and get before and after photographs and make

> sure you ask for a complete breakdown of the bill

> listing all the work done and charged for.

thats true Robinson15 with our last major works which finished 5 years ago they made us start paying the estimate approx ?8500 AFTER WE HAD PAID ?2700 I complained the final bill was ?1800.We are now waiting for the bill for the current major works estimate ?4700.
  • 2 weeks later...

I am told that the Divisional Manager of Homeownership/Leasehold Management has parted company with Southwark and the combined parts that made the department an integrated one stop shop has had its services and management farmed out to other departments. So instead of a dedicated department for leasehold matters they will now I expect have to take on other duties.


I.e.If Service Charges come under the remit of an income collections department it is likely that something like rent collection will be one of their functions. How Service Charges and rents are like for like remains to be seen.


All other services Major Works for example have been put under the management of other departments.


I wish you luck in trying to sort things out. It can only get more frustrating.


Perhaps Cllr Barber could explain more

Don't forget. There is the Tier One Tribunal where you can contest these charges. Always fight them. They have nothing but contempt for tenants and leaseholders alike. There is something rotten at the core of Southwark's housing department and it needs to be challenged big-time now.


As for Councillor Barber - and I'm not bashing councillors here as I do think they are amazing in that they usually have to hold down a job as well as doing what they do by giving up their spare time, and he does give that time to engage here ? but all he will say is 'Buy the freehold'. But it's often not possible if others in your block or house don't want to or you don't have ?10,000 to spare. He's living in la la land, really, where everyone is monied, I'm afraid.


And as for Mike Balfour, the council manager expressing his shock/horror here about what's going on, he's known very well how things are, going right back to the days of the cowboys Botes, who went into administration eventually. And the company before that was dreadful too. Not to mention Morrisons after them. Disaster. I have to say, though, that in most instances Mike did act whenever I contacted him, so he's genuine to some degree. And brave and decent of him to come on the forum, to be honest. He and I have a love/hate relationship, as you might have gathered...

got our copy of the breakdown of resposive repairs


1 repair 3 handles on downstairs tenents windows ?80

2 repair two roof leaks only one was done ?80

3 scaffolding tower for above (we believe they used a ladder and went over the roof) ?400

4 overheads ?120


now we have to query costs but only 2 weeks left before payment

  • 2 weeks later...

I am quite baffled about the actual service charge which was issued on 24/09 and then a reminder letter sent on 12/10. The estimated service charge was ?96.45 and the actual is ?609.83 so in total I am required to a difference of ?568.60. My property is a one bed first floor flat in a converted Victorian Terrace. The property downstairs is council owned. I have not had any work on my flat undertaken by the council.


The council are just about to start major work (painting windows and front of the houses) on the row of Victoria houses in the street, the cost of this over ?6000.


Can anyone advise how I can challenge the recent service charge bill?

I have spoken to my neighbour from downstairs and he has not had any work done or called the council out. However prior to him moving in the flat was completely refurbished due to the previous tenant causing substantial damage to the property- he was growing cannabis and the property was not habitable. So would I be liable to pay 50% of the cost for them renovating the flat?

I haven't read through all the pages here but just wanted to say that I took Southwark to the LVT over service charges and now pay none.

The council fought me all the way and were incredibly obstructive and as a result it was a tedious and time consuming process but for me had a good outcome.

during the process all sorts of ridiculous charges that the council couldn't back up at all were discovered so it is worth keeping on it and insisting for clarity and information - not something they were willing to give..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Last week we had no water for over 24 hours and very little support from Thames Water when we called - had to fight for water to be delivered, even to priority homes. Strongly suggest you contact [email protected] as she was arranging a meeting with TW to discuss the abysmal service
    • The is very low water pressure in the middle of Friern Road this morning.
    • I think mostly those are related to the same "issues". In my experience, it's difficult using the pin when reporting problems, especially if you're on a mobile... There's two obvious leaks in that stretch and has been for sometime one of them apparently being sewer flooding 😱  
    • BBC Homepage Skip to content Accessibility Help EFor you Notifications More menu Search BBC                     BBC News Menu   UK England N. Ireland Scotland Alba Wales Cymru Isle of Man Guernsey Jersey Local News Vets under corporate pressure to increase revenue, BBC told   Image source,Getty Images ByRichard Bilton, BBC Panorama and Ben Milne, BBC News Published 2 hours ago Vets have told BBC Panorama they feel under increasing pressure to make money for the big companies that employ them - and worry about the costly financial impact on pet owners. Prices charged by UK vets rose by 63% between 2016 and 2023, external, and the government's competition regulator has questioned whether the pet-care market - as it stands - is giving customers value for money. One anonymous vet, who works for the UK's largest vet care provider, IVC Evidensia, said that the company has introduced a new monitoring system that could encourage vets to offer pet owners costly tests and treatment options. A spokesperson for IVC told Panorama: "The group's vets and vet nurses never prioritise revenue or transaction value over and above the welfare of the animal in their care." More than half of all UK households are thought to own a pet, external. Over the past few months, hundreds of pet owners have contacted BBC Your Voice with concerns about vet bills. One person said they had paid £5,600 for 18 hours of vet-care for their pet: "I would have paid anything to save him but felt afterwards we had been taken advantage of." Another described how their dog had undergone numerous blood tests and scans: "At the end of the treatment we were none the wiser about her illness and we were presented with a bill of £13,000."   Image caption, UK pet owners spent £6.3bn on vet and other pet-care services in 2024, according to the CMA Mounting concerns over whether pet owners are receiving a fair deal prompted a formal investigation by government watchdog, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA). In a provisional report, external at the end of last year, it identified several issues: Whether vet companies are being transparent about the ownership of individual practices and whether pet owners have enough information about pricing The concentration of vet practices and clinics in the hands of six companies - these now control 60% of the UK's pet-care market Whether this concentration has led to less market competition and allowed some vet care companies to make excess profits 'Hitting targets' A vet, who leads one of IVC's surgeries (and who does not want to be identified because they fear they could lose their job), has shared a new internal document with Panorama. The document uses a colour code to compare the company's UK-wide tests and treatment options and states that it is intended to help staff improve clinical care. It lists key performance indicators in categories that include average sales per patient, X-rays, ultrasound and lab tests. The vet is worried about the new policy: "We will have meetings every month, where one of the area teams will ask you how many blood tests, X-rays and ultrasounds you're doing." If a category is marked in green on the chart, the clinic would be judged to be among the company's top 25% of achievers in the UK. A red mark, on the other hand, would mean the clinic was in the bottom 25%. If this happens, the vet says, it might be asked to come up with a plan of action. The vet says this would create pressure to "upsell" services. Panorama: Why are vet bills so high? Are people being priced out of pet ownership by soaring bills? Watch on BBC iPlayer now or BBC One at 20:00 on Monday 12 January (22:40 in Northern Ireland) Watch on iPlayer For instance, the vet says, under the new model, IVC would prefer any animal with suspected osteoarthritis to potentially be X-rayed. With sedation, that could add £700 to a bill. While X-rays are sometimes necessary, the vet says, the signs of osteoarthritis - the thickening of joints, for instance - could be obvious to an experienced vet, who might prefer to prescribe a less expensive anti-inflammatory treatment. "Vets shouldn't have pressure to do an X-ray because it would play into whether they are getting green on the care framework for their clinic." IVC has told Panorama it is extremely proud of the work its clinical teams do and the data it collects is to "identify and close gaps in care for our patients". It says its vets have "clinical independence", and that prioritising revenue over care would be against the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons' (RCVS) code and IVC policy. Vets say they are under pressure to bring in more money per pet   Published 15 April 2025 Vets should be made to publish prices, watchdog says   Published 15 October 2025 The vet says a drive to increase revenue is undermining his profession. Panorama spoke to more than 30 vets in total who are currently working, or have worked, for some of the large veterinary groups. One recalls being told that not enough blood tests were being taken: "We were pushed to do more. I hated opening emails." Another says that when their small practice was sold to a large company, "it was crazy... It was all about hitting targets". Not all the big companies set targets or monitor staff in this way. The high cost of treatment UK pet owners spent £6.3bn on vet and other pet-care services in 2024 - equal to just over £365 per pet-owning household, according to the CMA. However, most pet owners in the UK do not have insurance, and bills can leave less-well-off families feeling helpless when treatment is needed. Many vets used not to display prices and pet owners often had no clear idea of what treatment would cost, but in the past two years that has improved, according to the CMA. Rob Jones has told Panorama that when his family dog, Betty, fell ill during the autumn of 2024 they took her to an emergency treatment centre, Vets Now, and she underwent an operation that cost almost £5,000. Twelve days later, Betty was still unwell, and Rob says he was advised that she could have a serious infection. He was told a diagnosis - and another operation - would cost between £5,000-£8,000.   Image caption, Betty's owners were told an operation on her would cost £12,000 However, on the morning of the operation, Rob was told this price had risen to £12,000. When he complained, he was quoted a new figure - £10,000. "That was the absolute point where I lost faith in them," he says. "It was like, I don't believe that you've got our interests or Betty's interests at heart." The family decided to put Betty to sleep. Rob did not know at the time that both his local vet, and the emergency centre, branded Vets Now, where Betty was treated, were both owned by the same company - IVC. He was happy with the treatment but complained about the sudden price increase and later received an apology from Vets Now. It offered him £3,755.59 as a "goodwill gesture".   Image caption, Rob Jones says he lost faith in the vets treating his pet dog Betty Vets Now told us its staff care passionately for the animals they treat: "In complex cases, prices can vary depending on what the vet discovers during a consultation, during the treatment, and depending on how the patient responds. "We have reviewed our processes and implemented a number of changes to ensure that conversations about pricing are as clear as possible." Value for money? Independent vet practices have been a popular acquisition for corporate investors in recent years, according to Dr David Reader from the University of Glasgow. He has made a detailed study of the industry. Pet care has been seen as attractive, he says, because of the opportunities "to find efficiencies, to consolidate, set up regional hubs, but also to maximise profits". Six large veterinary groups (sometimes referred to as LVGs) now control 60% of the UK pet care market - up from 10% a decade ago, according to the CMA, external. They are: Linnaeus, which owns 180 practices Medivet, which has 363 Vet Partners with 375 practices CVS Group, which has 387 practices Pets at Home, which has 445 practices under the name Vets for Pets IVC Evidensia, which has 900 practices When the CMA announced its provisional findings last autumn, it said there was not enough competition or informed choice in the market. It estimated the combined cost of this to UK pet owners amounted to £900m between 2020-2024. Corporate vets dispute the £900m figure. They say their prices are competitive and made freely available, and reflect their huge investment in the industry, not to mention rising costs, particularly of drugs. The corporate vets also say customers value their services highly and that they comply with the RCVS guidelines.   Image caption, A CMA survey suggests pet owners are happy with the service they receive from vets A CMA survey suggests pet owners are happy with their vets - both corporate and independent - when it comes to quality of service. But, with the exception of Pets at Home, customer satisfaction on cost is much lower for the big companies. "I think that large veterinary corporations, particularly where they're owned by private equity companies, are more concerned about profits than professionals who own veterinary businesses," says Suzy Hudson-Cooke from the British Veterinary Union, which is part of Unite. Proposals for change The CMA's final report on the vet industry is expected by the spring but no date has been set for publication. In its provisional report, it proposed improved transparency on pricing and vet ownership. Companies would have to reveal if vet practices were part of a chain, and whether they had business connections with hospitals, out-of-hours surgeries, online pharmacies and even crematoria. IVC, CVS and Vet Partners all have connected businesses and would have to be more transparent about their services in the future. Pets at Home does not buy practices - it works in partnership with individual vets, as does Medivet. These companies have consistently made clear in their branding who owns their practices. The big companies say they support moves to make the industry more transparent so long as they don't put too high a burden on vets. David Reader says the CMA proposals could have gone further. "There's good reason to think that once this investigation is concluded, some of the larger veterinary groups will continue with their acquisition strategies." The CMA says its proposals would "improve competition by helping pet owners choose the right vet, the right treatment, and the right way to buy medicine - without confusion or unnecessary cost". For Rob Jones, however, it is probably too late. "I honestly wouldn't get another pet," he says. "I think it's so expensive now and the risk financially is so great.             Food Terms of Use About the BBC Privacy Policy Cookies Accessibility Help Parental Guidance Contact the BBC Make an editorial complaint BBC emails for you Copyright © 2026 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read about our approach to external linking.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...