Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I was down there last night and went to use the loo only for one of them to tell me it was out of order and that people were queuing for the disabled toilet.


We left and came back later only to find the loos were fine. Had no idea that had happened, but they did seem like a right bunch of rugger bugger lads, the worst most annoying kind of people you ever see out and about.


That is Feckin disgusting though, and I hope the police pop round for a word. He should have the balls to go in there and apologise in a big way.

KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Erm... wots the big deal. Yes its not particularly

> pleasent but hardly front page news... it happens

> in loads of places. Oh hang on is it simply coz

> its ED that its shocking and completely out of

> order? Seriously! *sigh*


What's the big deal? So ending up with human shit on the bottom of your shoe wouldn't bother you would it? Well we all have different standards I suppose. *sigh*


And as far as I'm aware it hasn't made the papers, it's just on a forum which you have chosen to read and even comment on, thus pushing the thread back to the top again.


No big deal? Maybe you were with the stag party? Were you the one got his knob out?

KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Erm... wots the big deal. Yes its not particularly

> pleasent but hardly front page news... it happens

> in loads of places. Oh hang on is it simply coz

> its ED that its shocking and completely out of

> order? Seriously! *sigh*


'It happens in loads of places' Jesus H. Christ - what sort of establishments do you frequent!?

Perhaps we should take it in turns to do the same on your door step, KK? See if that changes your opinion?


And ADMIN; given the positive identification by several people on here I don't see any justification for taking down the photo. That's pretty spineless, even by this forum's standards. Perhaps it would be more useful if someone were to send that photo to the Police, or at least to the poor staff at EDT so they can pass it on.


Shame on the pair of you.


I wonder if this post will be deleted, like before...........

oh now now your pathetic comments are really not needed nor are they justified as attempts at personal insults towards myself.


My point is why are certain participants making an issue out of something that happens from time to time. Yes it is annoying, disgusting blah blah blah but it's not like it's a regular occurance. It happened. What are you expecting others to do about it except stand around agreeing it's disgusting.


Get grip!

Really? In loads of places? Once saw a bloke urinate on the dance floor of a club in Hull about 20 years ago. Never seen handbags gathered up so quickly. Now I like to think I am a liberal minded chap but taking a dump on the floor of toilet is not acceptable whether it be East Dulwich or East Croydon. And talking about it on here is hardly front page news.
The staff in the EDT are some of the nicest I've known. They and they customers don't deserve such appalling behaviour. I've been known to be mouthy when under the influence, but that bloke wants shooting, and / or his wedding cancelled. Send the picture to the pub staff so they can bar him, and embarrass him in front of his mates if he dare show his face again.

Millhaven Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Really? In loads of places?


Yes really. Ud b surprised at the state of the loos up town in particular those many would consider as "classy" establishments. Ppl urinatining in public or displaying their privates openly is also common place again up town but also in camberwell and even LL in the early hours of the morn after kicking out time. *shrugs*

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> unlurked Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > cmck83 Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Oh my God. That's rank.

> >

> > The photo of the guy? I agree. Rugby to##er or

> Millwall thug? Hard to tell nowadays as they are

> > only separated by a single GCSE.

>

> Being a Millwall Season Ticket holder I take

> personal exception to your remarks.

>

> Neither myself nor the many Millwall fans I

> personally know could ever be considered as

> thugs.

>

> Many people here may disagree with my views on

> certain subjects, but I do believe not one of them

> who has met me

> would consider me a Thug.

>

> What has what this guy did anything ti do with

> Millwall. ?

>

> DulwichFox


Woah there mood-hoover. Unlurked was obviously making a joke.

And I was obviously commenting on the concept of someone doing a massive poo on a floor, not the photo. (Although yer man in the photo was no looker...)


PS. I agree, please forward the photo to the police/ EDT. Leaving a bio-hazard in the middle of a floor in a public area really isn't on.

Yes I appreciate there are all kinds of lewd behaviour going on throughout the metropolis. But our man here has leapt well over the line of public decency. What does surprise me though is your incredulity that people are so affronted by the incident.
Did anyone here ever watch those "Boozed up Brits Abroad" programmes? I used to be shocked about how many english lads used to be filmed drinking their own wee/ other people's wee etc. Being Irish, I used to find it odd that it always seemed to be English lads doing it and I quizzed my English boyfriend about it quite a bit. Is it some sort of English tradition? Being silly with human waste products on stag nights? Or were the lads in EDT merely trying to build upon a tired cliche and do something new and exciting? Discuss.

KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> oh now now your pathetic comments are really not

> needed nor are they justified as attempts at

> personal insults towards myself.

>

> My point is why are certain participants making an

> issue out of something that happens from time to

> time. Yes it is annoying, disgusting blah blah

> blah but it's not like it's a regular occurance.

> It happened. What are you expecting others to do

> about it except stand around agreeing it's

> disgusting.

>

> Get grip!


Wow, really classy response. You do realise that you are effectively defending this chaps repugnant behaviour, don't you?


And that wasn't a personal attack on you at all, I was merely assuming that you'd feel different if it were to directly effect you. I guess the staff of the EDT don't deserve your protection, lowly bar types that they are...

ED - NAGAIUTB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> KalamityKel Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > oh now now your pathetic comments are really

> not

> > needed nor are they justified as attempts at

> > personal insults towards myself.

> >

> > My point is why are certain participants making

> an

> > issue out of something that happens from time

> to

> > time. Yes it is annoying, disgusting blah blah

> > blah but it's not like it's a regular occurance.

>

> > It happened. What are you expecting others to

> do

> > about it except stand around agreeing it's

> > disgusting.

> >

> > Get grip!

>

> Wow, really classy response. You do realise that

> you are effectively defending this chaps repugnant

> behaviour, don't you?

>

> And that wasn't a personal attack on you at all, I

> was merely assuming that you'd feel different if

> it were to directly effect you. I guess the staff

> of the EDT don't deserve your protection, lowly

> bar types that they are...


Are you serious? Completely serious? Wow!

Kel I'm quite surprised at your stance here. Even if it does happen elsewhere, it's still disgusting. And it would be disgusting in any other area, this just happens to be the EAST DULWICH FORUM, the clue is kinda in the name.


ED - NAGAIUTB, harsh to accuse admin of being spineless. Admin coukd find themselves in a dodgy position if this dirty fucker saw his photo on here. If you want to post the photo, you pay for a forum off your own back and take the risks involved.


I agree the photo should be given to the police though, and shared with the EDT.

ED - NAGAIUTB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I guess the staff of the EDT don't deserve your protection, lowly

> bar types that they are...


Because moaning "oooh that's disgusting" about it on the local forum is such a brilliant way to protect the local bar staff.


Since that was such a success, let's moan about Syria for a while. We could have the whole situation sorted out by Tuesday.

But to be fair, all the "moaning" has led to the manky eejit in question more or less being identified. As long as the photo gets passed along to the relevant people, there is a good chance he will be found and at least made to apologise. It also means he is less likely to do it again, which does protect bar staff in the long run.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ED - NAGAIUTB Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I guess the staff of the EDT don't deserve your

> protection, lowly

> > bar types that they are...

>

> Because moaning "oooh that's disgusting" about it

> on the local forum is such a brilliant way to

> protect the local bar staff.

>

> Since that was such a success, let's moan about

> Syria for a while. We could have the whole

> situation sorted out by Tuesday.


RTFN.


I'm advocating shaming the twunt involved and making sure the EDT staff and Police get a copy of said picture. Ergo: action.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Absolute mugs. That's what they take you for.  
    • Trossachs definitely have one! 
    • A A day-school for girls and a boarding school for boys (even with, by the late '90s, a tiny cadre of girls) are very different places.  Though there are some similarities. I think all schools, for instance, have similar "rules", much as they all nail up notices about "potential" and "achievement" and keeping to the left on the stairs. The private schools go a little further, banging on about "serving the public", as they have since they were set up (either to supply the colonies with District Commissioners, Brigadiers and Missionaries, or the provinces with railway engineers), so they've got the language and rituals down nicely. Which, i suppose, is what visitors and day-pupils expect, and are expected, to see. A boarding school, outside the cloistered hours of lesson-times, once the day-pupils and teaching staff have been sent packing, the gates and chapel safely locked and the brochures put away, becomes a much less ambassadorial place. That's largely because they're filled with several hundred bored, tired, self-supervised adolescents condemned to spend the night together in the flickering, dripping bowels of its ancient buildings, most of which were designed only to impress from the outside, the comfort of their occupants being secondary to the glory of whatever piratical benefactor had, in a last-ditch attempt to sway the judgement of their god, chucked a little of their ill-gotten at the alleged improvement of the better class of urchin. Those adolescents may, to the curious eyes of the outer world, seem privileged but, in that moment, they cannot access any outer world (at least pre-1996 or thereabouts). Their whole existence, for months at a time, takes place in uniformity behind those gates where money, should they have any to hand, cannot purchase better food or warmer clothing. In that peculiar world, there is no difference between the seventh son of a murderous sheikh, the darling child of a ball-bearing magnate, the umpteenth Viscount Smethwick, or the offspring of some hapless Foreign Office drone who's got themselves posted to Minsk. They are egalitarian, in that sense, but that's as far as it goes. In any place where rank and priviilege mean nothing, other measures will evolve, which is why even the best-intentioned of committees will, from time to time, spawn its cliques and launch heated disputes over archaic matters that, in any other context, would have long been forgotten. The same is true of the boarding school which, over the dismal centuries, has developed a certain culture all its own, with a language indended to pass all understanding and attitiudes and practices to match. This is unsurprising as every new intake will, being young and disoriented, eagerly mimic their seniors, and so also learn those words and attitudes and practices which, miserably or otherwise, will more accurately reflect the weight of history than the Guardian's style-guide and, to contemporary eyes and ears, seem outlandish, beastly and deplorably wicked. Which, of course, it all is. But however much we might regret it, and urge headteachers to get up on Sundays and preach about how we should all be tolerant, not kill anyone unnecessarily, and take pity on the oiks, it won't make the blindest bit of difference. William Golding may, according to psychologists, have overstated his case but I doubt that many 20th Century boarders would agree with them. Instead, they might look to Shakespeare, who cheerfully exploits differences of sex and race and belief and ability to arm his bullies, murderers, fraudsters and tyrants and remains celebrated to this day,  Admittedly, this is mostly opinion, borne only of my own regrettable experience and, because I had that experience and heard those words (though, being naive and small-townish, i didn't understand them till much later) and saw and suffered a heap of brutishness*, that might make my opinion both unfair and biased.  If so, then I can only say it's the least that those institutions deserve. Sure, the schools themselves don't willingly foster that culture, which is wholly contrary to everything in the brochures, but there's not much they can do about it without posting staff permanently in corridors and dormitories and washrooms, which would, I'd suggest, create a whole other set of problems, not least financial. So, like any other business, they take care of the money and keep aloof from the rest. That, to my mind, is the problem. They've turned something into a business that really shouldn't be a business. Education is one thing, raising a child is another, and limited-liability corporations, however charitable, tend not to make the best parents. And so, in retrospect, I'm inclined not to blame the students either (though, for years after, I eagerly read the my Old School magazine, my heart doing a little dance at every black-edged announcement of a yachting tragedy, avalanche or coup). They get chucked into this swamp where they have to learn to fend for themselves and so many, naturally, will behave like predators in an attempt to fit in. Not all, certainly. Some will keep their heads down and hope not to be noticed while others, if they have a particular talent, might find that it protects them. But that leaves more than enough to keep the toxic culture alive, and it is no surprise at all that when they emerge they appear damaged to the outside world. For that's exactly what they are. They might, and sometimes do, improve once returned to the normal stream of life if given time and support, and that's good. But the damage lasts, all the same, and isn't a reason to vote for them. * Not, if it helps to disappoint any lawyers, at Dulwich, though there's nothing in the allegations that I didn't instantly recognise, 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...