Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've been shopping at this store for donkeys years and not witnessed anything more than some parents suffering irritable child syndrome, so I've been lucky


these people might respond if there was anymore nasty stuff though:

Sgt Peter Smith

[email protected]


a south camberwell councillor: http://www.cllrpeterjohn.blogspot.com (although better to wait for an election)

the local mp: http://www.tessajowell.net/ (hurry)


if desperate:

The Manager

Sainsburys

80 Dog Kennel Hill

EAST DULWICH

London

SE22 8BD


no solutions for self-appointed parking attendants tho

I have been in this branch of Sainsburys several times a week for years now and I can honestly say the only antisocial behaviour I've ever experienced has been at the hands of that peculiarly recognisable breed of "memsahib" that seems to frequent ED.


I've been:

*trolley barged

*had my trolley seized and flung out of the way

*been ordered imperiously to move

*stood politely to allow someone to pass, only to watch incredulously as a procession of above types have passed without a glance, let alone a thank-you

*I have also countless times had to negotiate my way around entire familes - with no move by adults to ask their children to move out of the way, and indeed 'attitide' when I have politely said "excuse me" or tried to reach around 3 children to get at a shelf. This one particularly annoys me. OK one parent on their own has no choice but to drag the kids through the supermarket, but Mum, Dad and three kids? Talk about lack of consideration for other people trying to go about their business!


I'm surprised I haven't been in a fight up there given the amount of provocation I experience at every visit!


By contrast the staff have always been chatty and sweet.

Not surprised this was jumped on in this way - but for the record - my issue wasn't at all with kids in Sainers - it was more about entire families milling about. Surely if there are two adults one could stay out and watch the kids? I would like to think that for a healthy, functional society here is room for people to make some allowances for how their choices affect the people they are sharing their space with?
I was verbally abused in Sainsbury's car park once: by a smug middle class couple...


Does no one here want to attack the use of 'smug middle class' as an unnecessary description? Or is that not a terribly-worthy enough a cause to get upset about?


And can you really be sure that they were middle class? Perhaps they were upper class people having a dress down day.

I dont have kids and dont mind walking across the car park; but then if I did have kids I wouldnt mind walking across the car park and cant quite understand why Parents are now classed as Disabled and so are in need of extra-close parking.
They're not classed as disabled. The extra wide bays are useful for when you need to open your door wide to get toddlers out of their seats and stand them by the side of the car whilst you pull out the rest of the paraphernalia. If there's none available it just means using up two bays elsewhere and walking a little further.

Those Parent parking spaces are wider than normal parking bays and it is helpful for someone getting children or a newborn in an infant carrier in and out. It is difficult when your car door cannot open all the way when trying to fasten your children in their car seats. It is a shame that people park in both these and the disabled bays when they clearly don't need to as they are reserved out of courtesy.


sorry off topic/


SORRY POSTED SAME TIME AS LOZZYLOZ!

I agree with MP, I don't see why parents get the benefit of extra close parking. All you really need is the wider bays. I am a dad of two little ones who usually parks on the far side of the car park as there is more space and you keep away from the jerks poaching for a closer space. Pop the little ones in a trolley and wheel it over to the store. There is a zebra crossing so its pretty safe.
Oh but keeping on topic I feel that the guy who got the beating was lucky that the gang attacked him at the entrance to JS, with lots of people around and the sainsbos staff, and security to jump in. Just imagine if they had waited for him somewhere less populated. Perhaps they just wanted to put the frighteners on him.
MichaelP - you clearly don't have kids if you can't see why....im not criticising it's just that you have no concept of how difficult it is getting say a 3 year old and an 8 month old into or out of your car in a cramped space in the pouring rain with shopping in safety....yes when people with older children use them then your point is valid

DeptfordDiva Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I have the perfect solution to this - ban

> reproduction then there would be no need for

> parent and child parking bays :))



Yes and then in about 80 years there would be no need for any bays at all as there would be nobody left to shop in sainsburys (or indeed work there). And nobody around to pick fights either.

catgirl Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DeptfordDiva Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I have the perfect solution to this - ban

> > reproduction then there would be no need for

> > parent and child parking bays :))

>

>

> Yes and then in about 80 years there would be no

> need for any bays at all as there would be nobody

> left to shop in sainsburys (or indeed work there).

> And nobody around to pick fights either.


And with no people wouldn't the world be a better place! - I'm with DeptfordDiva :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I mean I hold no portfolio to defend Gala,  but I suspect that is their office.  I am a company director,  my home address is also not registered with Companies House. Also guys this is Peckham not Royston Vasey.  Shoreditch is a mere 20 mins away by train, it's not an offshore bolt hole in Luxembourg.
    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...