Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I don't really think its a surprise with the chefs outside in their work clothes puffing away on their cigarettes , or the chefs walking to Iceland's in their uniforms to buy food for the restaurants , or the dirty trolley transporting meat across the road from an unmarked white van .

No thanks .

simonethebeaver Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Not really. I'm fairly relaxed about stuff, but

> drinking directly from cans that rats and mice in

> warehouse may have run over, with their leaky

> little bladders, is a bit grim.


xxxxxxx


Not if you just don't think about it :)


You'd never get out of bed if you worried about everything you might do which had a hygiene implication!


How many people do you know who have ever become ill through drinking out of a contaminated can?

I don't don't know exactly how these ratings change from 1 to 5. I imagine I can handle 3-5 but 1 and 2? What's the point of having hygiene ratings if we poo poo them? I saw the TV series a bit back. 1 and 2 are gross out bad. Thank you Government for setting parameters.

There have been cases of serious bouts of actual Food Poisoning in some very prestigious restaurants.

ie. 240 people became ill at the Fat Duck in Bray. (Not a hygiene problem) 3 years ago.


In 33 years living in East Dulwich, not heard of anyone actually been 'Poisoned' in any local restaurant.

Might be the odd case of , how can I put it... Dodgy Tum. (polite)


Anyone who eats any form of Street Food is unlikely to worry too much about Hygiene levels in local restaurants.


You are more likely to poison yourself at home through your own poor hygiene or through eating poorly stored food

or reheated food such as rice.


DulwichFox

Try searching for SE22 schools hygiene ratings:

http://ratings.food.gov.uk/authority-search/en-GB/%5E/se22/desc_rating/7845/528/%5E/1/1/10


Langbourne School doesnt do well with 2 stars 21/05/13(improvement necessary )

Kingsdale School 3 stars 14/10/11 (generally satisfactory)


And I have heard of people being poisoned it just didnt make the newspaper. Local Authorities don't undertake inspections for the fun of it!

DirtyBox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I always piss on my cans before drinking them,

> washes away the rats piss


xxxxxxx


You don't work in a shop, do you? :))


ETA: As in, replacing the unhygienic rats' piss with your own prior to selling the goods .....

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This?

>

> Again?

>

> * weeps *


Zackly!


Must try to find article apparently these bloody things are scorned by those in the industry for marking spotlessly clean kitchens down for not having brand new equipment or something.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • That a shocking story.  Spurs?  You appear to be lost.  Haringey is very much the other side of the river.  
    • Every year they ask for more and every year it is an exhausting process pushing back on that for local residents and councillors. What annoys me is that at the post event consultation/ feedback this year, I specifically asked them if the rumours around applying for two weekends next year were true. They told me no. So that was a lie. Anyway, we go again. 
    • Double In New or great condition  Or super comfortable air bed Any1 pls
    • Rant ahead: You're not one of them but unfortunately, there's a substrate of posters here that do very little except moan and come up with weird conspiracy theories. They're immediately highly critical of just about any change, and their initial assumption is that everyone else is a total fucking contemptible idiot. For example: don't you think that the people who run the libraries will have considered the impact of timing of reconstruction on library users? (In fact, we know they have - because they've made arrangements at other libraries to attempt to mitigate the disruption). After all, these are the people that spend their whole working week thinking about libraries and dealing with library users (and the kids especially). You don't go into the library game for the chicks and fame - so it's fair to assume that librarians are committed to public service and public access to libraries, including by kids. Likewise the built environment people (engineers, architects, construction managers, project managers, construction contractors, subcontractors or whoever is on this job) are told to minimise disruption on every job they do. The thing that occurs to us as amateurs within 30 seconds of us seeing something is probably not something a full time professional hasn't thought about! Southwark Council, the NHS, TfL, Dulwich Estate, Thames Water, Openreach - they're not SPECTRE factories filled with malevolent chaosmongers trying to persecute anyone. They're mostly filled with people who understand their job and try to do their best with what they've been given - just like all of us. Nobody is perfect or immune from challenge, and that's fair enough, but why not at least start from the assumption that there's a good reason why things have been done the way they have? Any normal person would be pleased that their busy, pretty, lively local library is getting refurbished, and will have more space and facilities for kids and teens, and will be more efficient to run and warmer in winter. But no, EDT_Forumite_752 had kids who did an exam 20 years ago, and this makes them an expert on library refurbishment who can see it's all just stuff and nonsense for the green agenda and why can't it all be put off... 😡😡😡
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...