Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Thought it was probably best to start this one in the Lounge as it's not strictly an ED issue...


We have a garden. It's got a shed at the bottom of it. It was there when we moved in; it's tiny and rotting and pretty much only good for firewood. I'd like to replace it.


I ride bicycles. I fix bicycles for a living (but am avoiding treading on the toes of MLteenie or the forthcoming EDR bike shop - I wish them all the best. That said, if you want your bike fixed at your house or place of work, give me a shout!) so would like somewhere secure to store my bikes and ideally set up a workshop, as well as storing the usual garden tools. I'm concerned by how easy it is to pretty much demolish most sheds if you're keen to have what's inside.


I've been drawn to the idea of a shipping container (painted a dark colour, with plants growing around and on top of it) as they're sturdy and very secure. Mrs. Pierre is reticent. She thinks it will subtract value from the house (rather than, I argue, adding it as a whole extra room at the bottom of the garden) and might attract derision from the neighbours. I have never cared what the neighbours think, but I'd want to make it as attractive and shed-like as possible. I think I have _some_ taste.


I appreciate my post is a little one-sided, but what do you good people of the EDF think? I'd be interested to know...


Cheers!


: P

Subject to the size of your garden and access it will fall foul of planning issues, I think primarily the height of a container is over the height of a garden structure that fits within permitted development, not to mention running a business from your garden. Check with Southwark planning

Thanks all - it appears to be just within planning regulations (under 3m tall), it would take up a lot less than half the garden area, and I wouldn't be using it exclusively to run the business. Oh, and we've got a private road along the back of the property (other side of the back fence) so hopefully getting the thing in won't be a problem.


I think they do rust, eventually, but it probably takes longer than it does for a wooden shed to rot. Am thinking about ED-ing it and growing a Green Roof anyway!


But if I was your next door neighbour, would you get all grumpy about the state of the neighbourhood, or would you think it was a Good Thing?


: P

I think my response would be very pissed off.


Unlike a shed, a container is pretty much permanent - you are unlikely to want to move it once it is in-situ. Besides you will still need to put a window in, insulate it and probably install electricity.


The idea of a container does sound like a bit of a caprice, something you fancy the idea of rather than it being the best solution to a given need.


You need a storage space and somewhere to work, buy a big shed, insulate it and wire it up to the ring main. It will avoid upsetting the neighbours when you have no real need to.


I have seen containers being used to create affordable housing, which is great; if that is what you chose to do, not so great if you just find one dumped next door.

I built my own shed a couple of years ago 20 feet by 14 feet it is double skinned shiplap on the out side and ply on the inside. It has double glazed windows roof and wall insulation and electricity and cost under ?3000.

It is less than one fifth of the garden and the neighbours contacted southwark to complain of an illegal building that had been erected. Sadly for them it was not an illegal erection:)

PM me for more details or if you wish to see it.

  • 2 weeks later...

Dear P


Just got back from holiday. My builder installs logs cabins - they can be small ie. 3m x 3m would only be about ?1,500 to buy, but you would need to put down a base and it sounds like you go do with some electrics - which is where my builder comes in as he can do both. I've got a 5m x 5m in my garden which has roof, base and wall insulation and double-glazed windows and doors. Probably a bit bigger than you would want but it would serve as a good example of what you could get for not much money. Also - provided it doesn't take up more than 50% of your garden, you leave 1m boundary all around and it isn't higher than 4m - then you don't need planning permission because it's classed as a non-permanent structure. If you're interested in more info - viewing my log cabin then contact me.

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
    • Niko 07818 607 583 has been doing jobs for us for several years, he is reliable, always there for us, highly recommended! 
    • I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...