Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Thought it was probably best to start this one in the Lounge as it's not strictly an ED issue...


We have a garden. It's got a shed at the bottom of it. It was there when we moved in; it's tiny and rotting and pretty much only good for firewood. I'd like to replace it.


I ride bicycles. I fix bicycles for a living (but am avoiding treading on the toes of MLteenie or the forthcoming EDR bike shop - I wish them all the best. That said, if you want your bike fixed at your house or place of work, give me a shout!) so would like somewhere secure to store my bikes and ideally set up a workshop, as well as storing the usual garden tools. I'm concerned by how easy it is to pretty much demolish most sheds if you're keen to have what's inside.


I've been drawn to the idea of a shipping container (painted a dark colour, with plants growing around and on top of it) as they're sturdy and very secure. Mrs. Pierre is reticent. She thinks it will subtract value from the house (rather than, I argue, adding it as a whole extra room at the bottom of the garden) and might attract derision from the neighbours. I have never cared what the neighbours think, but I'd want to make it as attractive and shed-like as possible. I think I have _some_ taste.


I appreciate my post is a little one-sided, but what do you good people of the EDF think? I'd be interested to know...


Cheers!


: P

Subject to the size of your garden and access it will fall foul of planning issues, I think primarily the height of a container is over the height of a garden structure that fits within permitted development, not to mention running a business from your garden. Check with Southwark planning

Thanks all - it appears to be just within planning regulations (under 3m tall), it would take up a lot less than half the garden area, and I wouldn't be using it exclusively to run the business. Oh, and we've got a private road along the back of the property (other side of the back fence) so hopefully getting the thing in won't be a problem.


I think they do rust, eventually, but it probably takes longer than it does for a wooden shed to rot. Am thinking about ED-ing it and growing a Green Roof anyway!


But if I was your next door neighbour, would you get all grumpy about the state of the neighbourhood, or would you think it was a Good Thing?


: P

I think my response would be very pissed off.


Unlike a shed, a container is pretty much permanent - you are unlikely to want to move it once it is in-situ. Besides you will still need to put a window in, insulate it and probably install electricity.


The idea of a container does sound like a bit of a caprice, something you fancy the idea of rather than it being the best solution to a given need.


You need a storage space and somewhere to work, buy a big shed, insulate it and wire it up to the ring main. It will avoid upsetting the neighbours when you have no real need to.


I have seen containers being used to create affordable housing, which is great; if that is what you chose to do, not so great if you just find one dumped next door.

I built my own shed a couple of years ago 20 feet by 14 feet it is double skinned shiplap on the out side and ply on the inside. It has double glazed windows roof and wall insulation and electricity and cost under ?3000.

It is less than one fifth of the garden and the neighbours contacted southwark to complain of an illegal building that had been erected. Sadly for them it was not an illegal erection:)

PM me for more details or if you wish to see it.

  • 2 weeks later...

Dear P


Just got back from holiday. My builder installs logs cabins - they can be small ie. 3m x 3m would only be about ?1,500 to buy, but you would need to put down a base and it sounds like you go do with some electrics - which is where my builder comes in as he can do both. I've got a 5m x 5m in my garden which has roof, base and wall insulation and double-glazed windows and doors. Probably a bit bigger than you would want but it would serve as a good example of what you could get for not much money. Also - provided it doesn't take up more than 50% of your garden, you leave 1m boundary all around and it isn't higher than 4m - then you don't need planning permission because it's classed as a non-permanent structure. If you're interested in more info - viewing my log cabin then contact me.

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Had council stock not been sold off then it wouldn't have needed replacing. Whilst I agree that the prohibition on spending revenue from sales on new council housing was a contributory factor, where, in places where building land is scarce and expensive such as London, would these replacement homes have been built. Don't mention infill land! The whole right to buy issue made me so angry when it was introduced and I'm still fuming 40 odd years later. If I could see it was just creating problems for the future, how come Thatcher didn't. I suspect though she did, was more interested in buying votes, and just didn't care about a scarcity of housing impacting the next generations.
    • Actually I don't think so. What caused the problem was the ban on councils using the revenues from sales to build more houses. Had councils been able to reinvest in more housing then we would have had a boom in building. And councils would have been relieved, through the sales, of the cost of maintaining old housing stock. Thatcher believed that council tenants didn't vote Conservative, and home owners did. Which may have been, at the time a correct assumption. But it was the ban on councils building more from the sales revenues which was the real killer here. Not the sales themselves. 
    • I agree with Jenjenjen. Guarantees are provided for works and services actually carried out; they are not an insurance policy for leaks anywhere else on the roof. Assuming that the rendering at the chimney stopped the leak that you asked the roofer to repair, then the guarantee will cover that rendering work. Indeed, if at some time in the future it leaked again at that exact same spot but by another cause, that would not be covered. Failure of rendering around a chimney is pretty common so, if re-rendering did resolve that leak, there is no particular reason to link it to the holes in the felt elsewhere across the roof. 
    • Hey, I am on the first floor and I am directly impacted if roof leaks. We got a roofing company to do repair work which was supposed to be guaranteed. However, when it started leaking again, we were informed that the guarantee is just for a new roof and not repair work. Each time the company that did the repair work came out again over the next few years, we had to pay additional amounts. The roof continues to leak, so I have just organised another company to fix the roof instead, as the guarantee doesn't mean anything. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...