Jump to content

Recommended Posts

For those, like me, who didn't have a clue what a Mary Portas Charity shop is:


"Mary Portas charity shops were first regarded as a crux of the High Street ? in 2009 she embarked upon revitalising Save the Children charity shops with gusto, creating a ?different? sort of charity shop in the form of ?Mary?s Living and Giving Shop? (be warned of hyperbole!) Portas seemingly disregarded what many see as the beauty of the charity shop ? its uniqueness. The stores became diluted and clinical, less individual and more like any other retailer. ?Living and Giving? shops can be found today in suburban gentrified neighbourhoods, with inflated prices where profit is paramount. So what ? as long as they are operating for charity? Isn?t modernising a positive step to remain competitive? There is definitely an argument for the cause here, as surely more profit equates to a greater benefit for the parent charity and the greater good? On the flipside however, by locating in affluent areas, potential customers who could actively benefit from affordable second-hand goods at a local level are excluded. People who really need access to cheap second-hand items are thus priced out of the market by the organisations which are arguably supposed to be there to help them."


Full article http://ihurerblog.org/2013/05/22/780/

edcam Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If there's a petition I'll sign it. So I expect

> would the people running the ample number of

> charity shops already in ED.


xxxxxx


Eh? What "ample number"?


So far as I know, there's:


The Mind shop


Two St Christopher hospice shops, one extremely small.


and that's it. Apart from a tiny one up past the Plough.

edcam Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If there's a petition I'll sign it. So I expect

> would the people running the ample number of

> charity shops already in ED.


I'm shocked at such an uncharitable attitude, and I doubt anyone running one of the few charity shops already in East Dulwich would in fact sign any such petition. Thankfully any petition would have little chance of success. Who would it be addressed to?

nxjen Wrote:

> I'm shocked at such an uncharitable attitude.

> Thankfully any petition would have little chance

> of success. Who would it be addressed to?


I'm shocked that people think it's a good idea to dilute the stock of the charity shops that are already there, whose trade would suffer as a result of yet another shop arriving. But that clearly doesn't bother you.

edcam Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> nxjen Wrote:

> > I'm shocked at such an uncharitable attitude.

> > Thankfully any petition would have little

> chance

> > of success. Who would it be addressed to?


xxxxxx

>

> I'm shocked that people think it's a good idea to

> dilute the stock of the charity shops that are

> already there, whose trade would suffer as a

> result of yet another shop arriving. But that

> clearly doesn't bother you.


xxxxxx


I think it's highly unlikely that existing charity shops' trade would suffer.


I buy clothes, books and bric a brac at the existing charity shops, but often there is nothing there I want. If there were more charity shops, then I'd be more likely to buy more because there would be a wider selection.


It's not as if it's another butcher opening when there are already x butchers in the area. It's completely different.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> I think it's highly unlikely that existing charity

> shops' trade would suffer.

>

> I buy clothes, books and bric a brac at the

> existing charity shops, but often there is nothing

> there I want. If there were more charity shops,

> then I'd be more likely to buy more because there

> would be a wider selection.

>

> It's not as if it's another butcher opening when

> there are already x butchers in the area. It's

> completely different.



I disagree Sue but let's just see.

I think the trade for the existing shops must suffer; there is, after all, only a finite amount of surplus people are willing to donate. The jam, so to speak, will get spread more thinly. Unless experts can prove, of course, that a concentration of similar shops brings in more trade.

Lynne

Lynne Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think the trade for the existing shops must

> suffer; there is, after all, only a finite amount

> of surplus people are willing to donate. The jam,

> so to speak, will get spread more thinly. Unless

> experts can prove, of course, that a concentration

> of similar shops brings in more trade.

> Lynne


xxxxxxx


I'm not sure that's necessarily the case.


The large hospice shop, for example, always seems to have a room full of stock at the back waiting to be put out.


I used to donate things to Trinity Hospice (on Clapham Common) to sell at their charity shops, and at the hospice itself they always had an overflowing room full of stock which their shops didn't have room for.


My gut feeling is that there will be plenty of stock for all the charity shops including the new one. There's certainly generally loads of stuff being given away free on this forum. In a relatively prosperous area, people give away things they've tired of in order to replace them with something newer.

"On the flipside however, by locating in affluent areas, potential customers who could actively benefit from affordable second-hand goods at a local level are excluded. People who really need access to cheap second-hand items are thus priced out of the market by the organisations which are arguably supposed to be there to help them"


This is a fundamental misunderstanding of the rationale of charity shops - they are there to raise funds, and if they sell their goods too cheaply they are not doing their jobs properly. There are various charities that collect second hand good for direct distribution to people in need, and every donor has a choice about what to give and to whom.

Charity shops serve a dual purpose, one is of course to raise funds for the charity the other is to allow people with lower resources to buy items they could not otherwise easily afford. Which in itself is a form of charity. Placing them in affluent areas allows people who are in position to give to do so, and there are plenty of people even in leafy suburbs who need charity shops.

These shops have been rolled out in "posh" areas of London. Brand new gear is donated by top brands and sold in the shops with a big percentage of net profit going to save the children. The shops look like they are fitted out to high specs. They need donations from the community too. Opening next Saturday from noon.


She's a clever lady.


Mary's living & giving

easytiger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> These shops have been rolled out in "posh" areas

> of London. Brand new gear is donated by top brands

> and sold in the shops with a big percentage of net

> profit going to save the children. The shops look

> like they are fitted out to high specs. They need

> donations from the community too. Opening next

> Saturday from noon.

>

> She's a clever lady.

>

> Mary's living & giving


Bit of a teeny space to fit out to "high specs" though no?


Or was the point saying that whilst it's a charity shop it won't look shabby so people shouldn't grumble about "lowering the tone" of the area?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • We’ve got a gap on the roof of our shed that needs patching  don’t want to buy a huge roll so hoping someone has some leftover  happy to collect/reimburse 
    • I never said I thought it was targeted or deliberate. There also has never been a “stand off” or confrontation, we’ve spoken to them in a friendly manner about it. Our experience is they don’t seem to care. That’s the frustrating thing for us, if someone politely raises a concern at least take a second to reflect. Treat others how you would want to be treated.  I don’t want them to lose their job, far from it. But considering it could cost me a days work to fix any damage, I’m within my right to try prevent it.   
    • The SE22 Evri delivery family are lovely, and always say hello wherever we spot them in the area. We gave them a box of chocolates during Covid as they were working their socks off at Christmas
    • What was he doing on the stage at Glastonbury? Or on the stage at the other concert in Finsbury Park? Grinning like a Cheshire cat whilst pissed and stoned 20 somethings on the promise of free internet sung-- Oh Jeremy Corbyn---  What were his policies for Northern mining towns with no jobs or infrastructure? Free Internet and university places for youngsters. What were his other manifesto pledges? Why all the ambiguity over Brexit?  I didn't like Thatcher, Blair or May or Tony but I respected them as politicians because they stood by what they believed in. I respect all politicians across the board that stick to their principles. Corbyn didn't and its why he got  annihilated at the polls. A socialist, anti imperialist and anti capitalist that said he voted for an imperialist and pro capitalist cabal. He refused to say how he'd vote over and over again until the last knockings. He did so to appease the Islington elite and middle class students he was courting. The same people that were screaming that Brexit was racist. At the same time the EU were holding black and Asian immigrants in refugee camps overseas but not a word on that! Corbyn created and courted a student union protest movement that screamed at and shouted down anyone not on the left . They claimed Starmer and the centre right of labour were tories. He didn't get elected  because he, his movement and policies were unelectable, twice. He turned out not to have the convictions of his politics and died on his own sword.    Reform won't win an election. All the idiots that voted for them to keep out Labour actually enabled Labour. They'll be back voting tory next time.    Farage wouldn't be able to make his millions if he was in power. He's a very devious shyster but I very much doubt he'd actually want the responsibility that governance requires.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...