Jump to content

Recommended Posts

For those, like me, who didn't have a clue what a Mary Portas Charity shop is:


"Mary Portas charity shops were first regarded as a crux of the High Street ? in 2009 she embarked upon revitalising Save the Children charity shops with gusto, creating a ?different? sort of charity shop in the form of ?Mary?s Living and Giving Shop? (be warned of hyperbole!) Portas seemingly disregarded what many see as the beauty of the charity shop ? its uniqueness. The stores became diluted and clinical, less individual and more like any other retailer. ?Living and Giving? shops can be found today in suburban gentrified neighbourhoods, with inflated prices where profit is paramount. So what ? as long as they are operating for charity? Isn?t modernising a positive step to remain competitive? There is definitely an argument for the cause here, as surely more profit equates to a greater benefit for the parent charity and the greater good? On the flipside however, by locating in affluent areas, potential customers who could actively benefit from affordable second-hand goods at a local level are excluded. People who really need access to cheap second-hand items are thus priced out of the market by the organisations which are arguably supposed to be there to help them."


Full article http://ihurerblog.org/2013/05/22/780/

edcam Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If there's a petition I'll sign it. So I expect

> would the people running the ample number of

> charity shops already in ED.


xxxxxx


Eh? What "ample number"?


So far as I know, there's:


The Mind shop


Two St Christopher hospice shops, one extremely small.


and that's it. Apart from a tiny one up past the Plough.

edcam Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If there's a petition I'll sign it. So I expect

> would the people running the ample number of

> charity shops already in ED.


I'm shocked at such an uncharitable attitude, and I doubt anyone running one of the few charity shops already in East Dulwich would in fact sign any such petition. Thankfully any petition would have little chance of success. Who would it be addressed to?

nxjen Wrote:

> I'm shocked at such an uncharitable attitude.

> Thankfully any petition would have little chance

> of success. Who would it be addressed to?


I'm shocked that people think it's a good idea to dilute the stock of the charity shops that are already there, whose trade would suffer as a result of yet another shop arriving. But that clearly doesn't bother you.

edcam Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> nxjen Wrote:

> > I'm shocked at such an uncharitable attitude.

> > Thankfully any petition would have little

> chance

> > of success. Who would it be addressed to?


xxxxxx

>

> I'm shocked that people think it's a good idea to

> dilute the stock of the charity shops that are

> already there, whose trade would suffer as a

> result of yet another shop arriving. But that

> clearly doesn't bother you.


xxxxxx


I think it's highly unlikely that existing charity shops' trade would suffer.


I buy clothes, books and bric a brac at the existing charity shops, but often there is nothing there I want. If there were more charity shops, then I'd be more likely to buy more because there would be a wider selection.


It's not as if it's another butcher opening when there are already x butchers in the area. It's completely different.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> I think it's highly unlikely that existing charity

> shops' trade would suffer.

>

> I buy clothes, books and bric a brac at the

> existing charity shops, but often there is nothing

> there I want. If there were more charity shops,

> then I'd be more likely to buy more because there

> would be a wider selection.

>

> It's not as if it's another butcher opening when

> there are already x butchers in the area. It's

> completely different.



I disagree Sue but let's just see.

I think the trade for the existing shops must suffer; there is, after all, only a finite amount of surplus people are willing to donate. The jam, so to speak, will get spread more thinly. Unless experts can prove, of course, that a concentration of similar shops brings in more trade.

Lynne

Lynne Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think the trade for the existing shops must

> suffer; there is, after all, only a finite amount

> of surplus people are willing to donate. The jam,

> so to speak, will get spread more thinly. Unless

> experts can prove, of course, that a concentration

> of similar shops brings in more trade.

> Lynne


xxxxxxx


I'm not sure that's necessarily the case.


The large hospice shop, for example, always seems to have a room full of stock at the back waiting to be put out.


I used to donate things to Trinity Hospice (on Clapham Common) to sell at their charity shops, and at the hospice itself they always had an overflowing room full of stock which their shops didn't have room for.


My gut feeling is that there will be plenty of stock for all the charity shops including the new one. There's certainly generally loads of stuff being given away free on this forum. In a relatively prosperous area, people give away things they've tired of in order to replace them with something newer.

"On the flipside however, by locating in affluent areas, potential customers who could actively benefit from affordable second-hand goods at a local level are excluded. People who really need access to cheap second-hand items are thus priced out of the market by the organisations which are arguably supposed to be there to help them"


This is a fundamental misunderstanding of the rationale of charity shops - they are there to raise funds, and if they sell their goods too cheaply they are not doing their jobs properly. There are various charities that collect second hand good for direct distribution to people in need, and every donor has a choice about what to give and to whom.

Charity shops serve a dual purpose, one is of course to raise funds for the charity the other is to allow people with lower resources to buy items they could not otherwise easily afford. Which in itself is a form of charity. Placing them in affluent areas allows people who are in position to give to do so, and there are plenty of people even in leafy suburbs who need charity shops.

These shops have been rolled out in "posh" areas of London. Brand new gear is donated by top brands and sold in the shops with a big percentage of net profit going to save the children. The shops look like they are fitted out to high specs. They need donations from the community too. Opening next Saturday from noon.


She's a clever lady.


Mary's living & giving

easytiger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> These shops have been rolled out in "posh" areas

> of London. Brand new gear is donated by top brands

> and sold in the shops with a big percentage of net

> profit going to save the children. The shops look

> like they are fitted out to high specs. They need

> donations from the community too. Opening next

> Saturday from noon.

>

> She's a clever lady.

>

> Mary's living & giving


Bit of a teeny space to fit out to "high specs" though no?


Or was the point saying that whilst it's a charity shop it won't look shabby so people shouldn't grumble about "lowering the tone" of the area?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Exactly what I said, that Corbyn's group of univeristy politics far-left back benchers would have been a disaster during Covid if they had won the election. Here you go:  BBC News - Ex-union boss McCluskey took private jet flights arranged by building firm, report finds https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3kgg55410o The 2019 result was considered one of the worst in living memory for Labour, not only for big swing of seats away from them but because they lost a large number of the Red-wall seats- generational Labour seats. Why? Because as Alan Johnson put it so succinctly: "Corbyn couldn't lead the working class out of a paper bag"! https://youtu.be/JikhuJjM1VM?si=oHhP6rTq4hqvYyBC
    • Agreed and in the meantime its "joe public" who has to pay through higher prices. We're talking all over the shop from food to insurance and everything in between.  And to add insult to injury they "hurt " their own voters/supporters through the actions they have taken. Sadly it gets to a stage where you start thinking about leaving London and even exiting the UK for good, but where to go????? Sad times now and ahead for at least the next 4yrs, hence why Govt and Local Authorities need to cut spending on all but essential services.  An immediate saving, all managerial and executive salaries cannot exceed and frozen at £50K Do away with the Mayor of London, the GLA and all the hanging on organisations, plus do away with borough mayors and the teams that serve them. All added beauracracy that can be dispensed with and will save £££££'s  
    • The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
    • Exactly - a snap election will make things even worse. Jazzer - say you get a 'new' administration tomorrow, you're still left with the same treasury, the same civil servants, the same OBR, the same think-tanks and advisors (many labour advisors are cross-party, Gauke for eg). The options are the same, no matter who's in power. Labour hasn't even changed the Tories' fiscal rules - the parties are virtually economically aligned these days.  But Reeves made a mistake in trying too hard, too early to make some seismic changes in her first budget as a big 'we're here and we're going to fix this mess, Labour to the rescue' kind of thing . They shone such a big light on the black hole that their only option was to try to fix it overnight. It was a comms clusterfuck.  They'd perhaps have done better sticking to Sunak's quiet, cautious approach, but they knew the gullible public was expecting an 24-hour turnaround miracle.  The NIC hikes are a disaster, I think they'll be reversed soon and enough and they'll keep trying till they find something that sticks.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...