Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I was a northerner by'eck and I'll 'ave you know 'appen that a goodish lump of East Dulwich was born bred and built by a northerner, hence all those northern names melbourne chesterfield ashbourne groves 'is name was Bailey thou knows.


This ancient knowledge is extremely reliable as it comes from the back end of se22 a magazine of some quality.

I have just got back from t'north (Warrington, York, Sunderland and Luton).


You can see why people might want to move south, its grim up there, all rain and big knickers.


The only positive element seems to be a the number of available allotments, of course this may be because of the number of empty houses.


You only get a half a pint of beer, the rest is froth, which they seem to worship, that and pickled eggs and dripping sandwiches. Its a varied diet, just as long as its hot and shiny.


Let them come south and guest-workers to replace the Poles, who are all going home as they dscover what we all knew ....

I like the North and northerners too really, I also like the south. Much as it can be fun, I gave when people get serious about the north south thing. There are a lot of northerners who think that we've all had it great down south whilst they've been shat on, and a lot of southerners who probably think they're a bit superior. At the end of the day It's all a load of shite, and both north and south should just get along and be happy that they're not from the midlands or wales!

I am from the West Midlands where you can get Banks' Mild Ale, hot pork sandwiches, scratchings, chewy air, proper balties and scabies and Shakespeare. Makes me proud.


The East Midlands is a bit of a dump mind.


The bit of the countr to the North of the West Midands is so bad that THOUSANDS of people block the M6 to get away from it every day. Makes you think.

They do, it was called Yate's wine lodge, but I don't know if they still exist.


It was the only place that sold wine by the shipload,

which was a large glass called a schooner that could render you legless after only two or three.


They also had boarded floors with sawdust to kick around whilst you staggered up or down the very long bar.

Definitely recommend pies and prejudice by Stuart Maconie on the beauty of the north. Why is it that the news channels need to have North of England correspondents, but no South of England correspondents?

I'm a northerner (nr Bury and Bolton) enjoying ED for 2 years now and London for 9.

Biggest difference? I remember my first trip down Oxford Street shopping and throughout the day whenever I held the door of a shop open to let someone else through, there was no "thanks love" or "cheers mate", they just walked through without uttering thanks or offering a cheeky wink. On a positive note, the other big difference is that Londoners have perfected the art of escalator travel; very few citys up north would or have split an escalator into a slow and fast lane.


Of course I could mention the difference what you get for your money in terms of property, but that would also depress me!


Another good piece:

sticking up for the north

Ah, you are forgetting that here in the South, a Northerner opening a door for one is probably a servant and one should not be too intimate with the staff lest they forget themselves and become over familiar and expect an extra blanket.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...