Jump to content

Recommended Posts

pinecone Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> it's more likely the young unfortunate who got

> stabbed was a low-ranking drugs dealer who didn't

> pay his supplier on time.


xxxxxx


Unless you know who he was and why he was stabbed, why are you spreading misinformation about someone who has been the victim of a serious crime?

pinecone Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> it's not misinformation. it's speculation. read

> closer next time before posting.


xxxxxx


Speculation or misinformation, it's dissing somebody about whom you know absolutely nothing. Somebody who has just been hurt.


"More likely that ....." . Yeh, right. You're basing that on - what, exactly?


"Read closer before posting"? Maybe you should engage your brain before posting. If you have one.

You're forgiven for being a reactionary who thinks that corporal and capital punishment are both a deterrent and immune to miscarriages of justice.


You're forgiven for having a massive misunderstanding of the true nature of gang culture and the issues faced by sections of society totally cut off from the norms that the rest of us work within.


You're forgiven for thinking that brutalising a violent offender is the same as punishing them and attempting to rehabilitate them.


You're forgiven for leaping to unprovable conclusions that you have assumed must be correct because they fit with your view of how the world has changed.


I don't wear rose tinted spectacles, and I'm well aware of the dangers of gangs; there's parts of Peckham which are still no-go zones after a certain time of night, for example. The recent police raids serve to highlight got seriously they take it too. But as a society, when we assume the worst of every situation, and assume every kid within a hundred metres of a knife is a 'gangbanger', or some low level dealer that can't count. Some of them certainly are, but if we assume they all are, and treat them as such, then they'll end up like that. We have to imprison and (hopefully) re-educate the hardcore gang members. Maybe, like some notable cases in the USA, they can then join the rest of us in the main task - preventing the younger kids from thinking the gang is the only way to have a future. Because that's on all of us.

It's vital to seperate over-reactionary rhetoric, like demanding the return of the birch, from realistic tactics to defeat gangs and make children understand that education is not only vital, but can actually lead to something more than they have experienced.


(Edited a couple of times for bad language, trying to behave myself better!)

pinecone Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> forgive me for not wearing the same rose-tinted

> spectacles as everyone else.



It's not about rose tinted specs. It's just about not being a dick. But it's clear you won't get it.

Insufficient bandwidth.

You couldn't make this up!


On January 21, 06:59PM Pinecone wrote:


Re: Mugged at knife point this evening


"a few weeks ago I got confronted by a dude at the bus stop at the corner of the gardens and peckham rye. he clearly wanted trouble, but I ran off before he produced a knife or did anything."


Just 12 days later Pinecone wrote about the victim of an incident at the same spot...


Re: The gardens police cordon


Posted by pinecone February 02, 10:31PM


"it's more likely the young unfortunate who got stabbed was a low-ranking drugs dealer who didn't pay his supplier on time."


Such a high degree of irony must surely have been intentional - pinecone???


Or maybe there was no irony and the "dude" who "clearly wanted trouble" with pinecone just mistook him/her for a low ranking drugs dealer who hadn't paid?


Which was it pinecone?

dulwichbloke Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You couldn't make this up!

>

> On January 21, 06:59PM Pinecone wrote:

>

> Re: Mugged at knife point this evening

>

> "a few weeks ago I got confronted by a dude at the

> bus stop at the corner of the gardens and peckham

> rye. he clearly wanted trouble, but I ran off

> before he produced a knife or did anything."

>

> Just 12 days later Pinecone wrote about the victim

> of an incident at the same spot...

>

> Re: The gardens police cordon

>

> Posted by pinecone February 02, 10:31PM

>

> "it's more likely the young unfortunate who got

> stabbed was a low-ranking drugs dealer who didn't

> pay his supplier on time."

>

> Such a high degree of irony must surely have been

> intentional - pinecone???

>

> Or maybe there was no irony and the "dude" who

> "clearly wanted trouble" with pinecone just

> mistook him/her for a low ranking drugs dealer who

> hadn't paid?

>

> Which was it pinecone?



Brilliant !

This is the forum at its best !

Daily Mail, Mumsnet - I think you might be onto something Pinecone. If I were you, I'd just ignore the EDF's pitchfork-wielding yokels. They just don?t want to have to imagine their cosy, bucolic domain could potentially be disrupted by an icy blast of urban reality - especially when they?re having to fork out so much money to live in this little corner of God?s earthly paradise.

pinecone Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> as i have said before when the EDF is in full cry,

> it resembles something of a cross between the

> daily mail and mumsnet.



Well Pinecone, what can I say? When people on the forum reject your argument, you resort to insulting them. Frankly, to compare them to the Daily Fail when you think hanging people would help (something even Maggie Thatcher refused to reintroduce, despite her personal support for it), is pretty hypocritical.


Put bluntly, if you think the person who got stabbed was a drug dealer or a gangbanger, prove it. Provide evidence of some kind. Otherwise you're just assuming, and it starts to smell bigoted.


And DaSilva? If you don't like it round here, feel free to leave. I doubt anyone will miss you.


Anyway, I'm leaving this one now before I get too wound up. Gang culture and crime has existed for a long time and will go on existing until folk like Pinecone recognise that we need a pluralistic approach to it. Effective policing and harsh prison sentences for serious offenders? Yes please. Youth outreach schemes and heavy investment in education coupled with proper role models for young people. Also yes please.


Or does Pinecone ignore those ideas and prefer to shoot them in the street?

DaSilva I don't think anyone's shocked over the (wow, so 'edgy') thought of a small-time petty gang member strutting the streets of ED, it's more a reluctance to allow foolish and unfounded speculation because that betrays bigotry and ignorance - which we all have a duty to kick into touch.

You prefer something different ?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Sophie, I have to thank you for bringing me squarely into 2025.  I was aware of 4G/5G USB dongles for single computers, and of being able to use smartphones for tethering 4G/5G, but hadn't realised that the four mobile networks were now providing home hub/routers, effectively mimicking the cabled broadband suppliers.  I'd personally stick to calling the mobile networks 4G/5G rather than wifi, so as not to confuse them with the wifi that we use within home or from external wifi hotspots. 4G/5G is a whole diffferent, wide-area set of  networks, and uses its own distinct wavebands. So, when you're saying wi-fi, I assume you're actually referring to the wide-area networks, and that it's not a matter of just having poor connections within your home local area network, or a router which is deficient.   If any doubt, the best test will be with a computer connected directly to the router by cable; possibly  trying different locations as well. Which really leaves me with only one maybe useful thing to say.  :) The Which pages at https://www.which.co.uk/reviews/broadband/article/what-is-broadband/what-is-4g-broadband-aUWwk1O9J0cW look pretty useful and informative. They include local area quality of coverage maps for the four providers (including 5G user reports I think) , where they say (and I guess it too is pretty common knowledge): Our survey of the best and worst UK mobile networks found that the most common issues mobile customers have are constantly poor phone signal and continuous brief network dropouts – and in fact no network in our survey received a five star rating for network reliability. 
    • 5G has a shorter range and is worse at penetrating obstacles between you and the cell tower, try logging into the router and knocking it back to 4G (LTE) You also need to establish if the problem is WiFi or cellular. Change the WiFi from 5GHz to 2.4GHz and you will get better WiFi coverage within your house If your WiFi is fine and moving to 4G doesn't help then you might be in a dead spot. There's lots of fibre deployed in East Dulwich
    • Weve used EE for the past 6 years. We're next to Peckham Rye. It's consistent and we've never had any outages or technical issues. We watch live streams for football and suffer no lags or buffering.   All the best.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...