Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I won't mention what film as I am sure the intellects on here will tell me I got what I deserved... me and Mrs SCSB sat down with our large pop corn and pepsi... film starts... 2 female yoof in front of us don't stop talking... ignore it thinks I... half an hour in... out comes the mobile and she makes a call (one of da yoof, not Mrs SCSB)!!!! I tap on the chair next to her and ask her to be quiet... I get a kiss of the teeth, called a honkey, and laughed at.

You gotta love the youth of today.


Do you know the worst thing about it, they left early, and I really thought they may have gone outside to round up some male yoof to take care of me.

I took my nephew there to see the Mummy 3, sticky floors, dirty chairs, volume too high, and rank toilets....went to Mcdonalds after...only because the nephew refused to have KFC, staff there didn;t understand anything we said, or anything anyone said for that matter so we were queuing up forever whilst we and everyone explained for the 10th time our order.

Peckham sucks.


But all the other cinemas are so far.


They do have attitude in Peckham, Kissing the teeth, walking slow like a tourist and shoving pass people is the norm in peckham...as is pushing meat in dirty trolleys across dirty polluted roads to dirty butchers in peckham...yuk...I used to like Peckham as a kid...BHS, Marks and Spencers....Sigh.

Oh Lord here we go again with the Great Peckham Debate.


I rather like the Multiplex - its cheap, cheery and local.


And I absolutely love it when the entire audience decide to "cuss" the on-screen characters - as seems to happen in very cheesy rom-coms. There's an applaudable suspension of disbelief and willingness to emotionaly invest (even when the film features Russell Brand acting in a skimpy little sarong).


But yes, talking would annoy me terribly too.

There is none near...I think Elephant and Castle plus Brixton might have a cinema but not sure as never been.


I am not having a Peckham/Dulwich debate, and I go Peckham often, used to work in Jobcentreplus there ( don't get me started!) but the people there do annoy me, it is the attitude I just cannot abide, saying that everyone in London has an attitude and as I have one of my own, I don't need anyone elses!:))

Bellenden Belle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh Lord here we go again with the Great Peckham

> Debate.

>

> I rather like the Multiplex - its cheap, cheery

> and local.

>

> And I absolutely love it when the entire audience

> decide to "cuss" the on-screen characters - as

> seems to happen in very cheesy rom-coms. There's

> an applaudable suspension of disbelief and

> willingness to emotionaly invest (even when the

> film features Russell Brand acting in a skimpy

> little sarong).

>

> But yes, talking would annoy me terribly too.


Excuse me.. where did I slag off Peckham?? All I ever commented on was the lovely youth that we have in our neighbourhood. Get off your high horse.

HeidiHi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Peckham sucks.

> >

> They do have attitude in Peckham, Kissing the

> teeth, walking slow like a tourist and shoving

> pass people is the norm in peckham...as is pushing

> meat in dirty trolleys across dirty polluted roads

> to dirty butchers in peckham...yuk...I used to

> like Peckham as a kid...BHS, Marks and

> Spencers....Sigh.


SCBS79 - I was responding to the above paragraph, not to your original post, so no offence meant. And my last line did indicate sympathy to your original post. But please let's not go down the Peckham Debate route.


As for cinemas -- you could always try Curzon Soho - it might not seem local but is a mere bus ride away from East Dulwich. Or Greenwich Picturehouse is worth a car journey.


And re-reading my post I don't think I was on my high horse at all... a comical donkey perhaps, but little more.

Bellenden Belle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> HeidiHi Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Peckham sucks.

> > >

> > They do have attitude in Peckham, Kissing the

> > teeth, walking slow like a tourist and shoving

> > pass people is the norm in peckham...as is

> pushing

> > meat in dirty trolleys across dirty polluted

> roads

> > to dirty butchers in peckham...yuk...I used to

> > like Peckham as a kid...BHS, Marks and

> > Spencers....Sigh.

>

> SCBS79 - I was responding to the above paragraph,

> not to your original post, so no offence meant.

> And my last line did indicate sympathy to your

> original post. But please let's not go down the

> Peckham Debate route.

>

> As for cinemas -- you could always try Curzon Soho

> - it might not seem local but is a mere bus ride

> away from East Dulwich. Or Greenwich Picturehouse

> is worth a car journey.

>

> And re-reading my post I don't think I was on my

> high horse at all... a comical donkey perhaps, but

> little more.


Fair point, but there is a quote facility to stop confusion Miss Donkey.

I also add that the Greenwich Picturehouse is pretty close and is a good experience. Mixes standard mainstream films with more obscure / revivals / arthouse films. Good bar and eats. Generally a more mature audience interested in the film rather than talking - also, so far, no nasty cheese & nacho type food smells

Greenwich Picture House

Al&Em Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What's this teeth kissing thing then? Pls

> elaborate..?



its when someone sort of sucks air in between their front teeth - normally if something's been done or said that they don't like instead of saying out loud what was bothering them, personally, I find it the most annoying thing someone can do - would rather they said out loud what was bothering them/causing upset so that the issue could be dealt with.

Cinema 1 at the Ritzy is hopelessly designed and the screen itself is too small but it's the best of a generally poor selection of indie cinemas in South London with Greenwich picturehouse a close second. The best in terms of programme and overall experience is the BFI on the South Bank. Not only does it show a great selection of films but the social aspects are really well conceived and integrated. It'd be interesting to know if City Screen (who run the Ritzy, Greenwich and Curzon Soho) saw a potential market and venue opportunity in ED given the demographics and the gap in provision.

For what it's worth, City Screen do run the Picturehouses, but the Curzon Soho (and the other London Curzon cinemas) are run by another company - Curzon Artificial Eye.


Agree that there's a decent market for an arthouse/independent cinema somewhere within easy reach of SE22/SE23. Shame that Wetherspoons have no intention of letting go of the Capitol building anytime soon - it would have been perfect.

I like the Peckham cinema - however it's cheap and cheerful so you cannot expect art house attitudes from everyone there. Incidentally the worse cinema I've been to for people talking and leaving their mobiles on has been in the Ritzy in Brixton - maybe they thought it was a sub-titled film that it was OK.


I've had a couple of complaints in the past at Peckham - loo's not great and once the film didn't actually start, but when approached nicely the staff have been really helpful (although forgetting to actually start the film wasn't that great!)

Cassius Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

I've had a couple of complaints in the past at

> Peckham - loo's not great and once the film didn't

> actually start, but when approached nicely the

> staff have been really helpful (although

> forgetting to actually start the film wasn't that

> great!)


Unless it was Godfather III, in which case they were exercising a little humanity.

A Cinema in ED.

That would be a very satisfactory full circle, used to go to the Saturday Mornings shows at the one in Grove Vale opposite the petrol station. (flats now on the old car park.)


That closed down due to under use & became the Palace of Peace!


Is it possible that one maybe a bit closer to D/V to draw on both sets of inhabitants would be viable?

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi - I posted a request for some help with a stuck door and possible leaky roof. I had responses from Lukasz at Look_as.com and Pawel at Sublime Builders. I don't see any/many reviews - has anyone used either person?  Could use a recommendation rather then just being contact by the tradespeople... Many Thanks 
    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...