Jump to content

Recommended Posts

BBC Three is the most pointless waste of airtime I've ever known. They occasionally do a serious teen/social issues based documentary which is interesting, but most of the time it is simply as you say, re-runs of un-funny animated American comedy shows or a repeat of Eastenders. If it goes online it will surely continue to attract it's target audience anyway. BBC four on the other hand would be a great loss if it ever went the same way.


Louisa.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/41907-bbc3-axed/#findComment-726428
Share on other sites

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I like the late night music biopics late Saturday

> nights - but I'm usually too sozzled to remember

> whether they are on BBC3 or BBC4......hopefully

> bbc4.


haha! I know what you mean. But fear not, they are safely on BBC4 at the moment.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/41907-bbc3-axed/#findComment-726458
Share on other sites

Millhaven Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> PeckhamRose Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > They're not axing it, they're putting it

> online.

>

> Bloody Guardian media twitter account were saying

> 'axed'. Typical.


Guardian & Twitter......did you expect truth?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/41907-bbc3-axed/#findComment-726518
Share on other sites

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Millhaven Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > PeckhamRose Wrote:

>

> Guardian & Twitter......did you expect truth?


Ha! To be fair, other media outlets have used the term "axed" as well.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/41907-bbc3-axed/#findComment-726538
Share on other sites

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Guardian & Twitter......did you expect truth?


twitter is unbearable at the moment, so much crap flying around. I only use it for entertainment purposes, having chats with people and learning about things that aren't related to politics, history or science because you haven't got a hope in hell there.


on topic, does this mean I won't be able to watch family guy anymore? probably a good thing. am still singing the bird song in my head.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/41907-bbc3-axed/#findComment-726542
Share on other sites

If callers to his radio show are anything to go by, most of bakers listeners are well outside london, never mind new cross


Twitter is bigger than before so has more idiots. Why are they in your timeline


Bbc3 is being taken off air. Relegated to iplayer only it is effectively axed, so no real misreporting there either

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/41907-bbc3-axed/#findComment-726556
Share on other sites

It's not even really about twitter or idiots in your timeline strafer.


its people writing misinformed blogs that on the surface look quite good and seem 'factual' and then some nice people RTing it and so on, perpetuating crap as 'truths' or implied consensus view. one particularly sensible writer I follow is just RTing everything that is being 'live tweeted' by another person he follows. It is driving me barmy as if I wanted to f-ing follow someone live tweeting an event then I'd follow them, I don't need someone else to do it for me. If that makes sense.


and then of course there's the ones whose politics or point of view I just disagree with. idiots ;)


edit: mute button very handy, i've muted him for a couple of days. I think its healthy to read stuff that you don't always agree with too, as long as its not factually wrong.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/41907-bbc3-axed/#findComment-726561
Share on other sites

Back on topic (my fault) BBC 3 feels like a repeat channel for Gavin & Stacey. BBC4 on the other hand is fantastic and quite frequently my first point of call on a TV night (especially on Fridays). In danger of damaging my beeb bashing cred, but I would pay the licence fee for BBC4 and Radio 6 alone - although Radio 6 veers towards a touch of the smugness.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/41907-bbc3-axed/#findComment-726578
Share on other sites

True now RE Beeb4 but for a while it teetered with some abysmal viewing figures even at prime - sometimes under 1000 - with more than a few people questioning what the justification for it could be.


Since then, it's a good example of how money carefully spent in the right place - with a clear overall vision and brand - can build a channel which people actively scan the programme guide for.


BBC3 could never decide what it was - and the thing it hoped it might be (comedy) was never up to scratch.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/41907-bbc3-axed/#findComment-726598
Share on other sites

I'm with the OP. Losing BBC4 would be awful - it's precisely what a public service channel should be and doesn't chase big audiences or the next trend. The idea of BBC3 was ok but the reality most of the time was rubbish. Trying out some of this stuff online is fine, it's where we'll watch everything in the not too distant future.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/41907-bbc3-axed/#findComment-726600
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • @CPR Dave He needs to communicate collectively with all of the beneficiaries.  That is the whole point of my original post.  Electronic communications are the best way of doing this, as I am doing now on this forum.  Apart from the gold digger who will get a six figure sum the rest of us are on four figures, and that is going down by the day. I'm offended by any suggestion that we are not behaving well.  What on earth do you mean?  
    • Surprise, surprise. It didn't take them long, did it. This will be something of a test as to how much the council really care about parks and the environment. A footfall of 60,000. Are they mad? There is no way this park is designed for or can sustain that sort of use. Just had a look at the schedule. If allowed to go ahead, this will involve a large slice of the park (not the common) sectioned off and out of use for three weeks of May and the first week of June. Here's an idea, why not trial the festival in one of the other Southwark Parks, so the 'goodness' can be shared around the borough?
    • There was another unprovoked attack on Monday this week on a young woman nearby (Anstey Road) at 6.45pm. Don't have any other details, it was posted on a Facebook group by her flatmate. Pretty worrying  https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1EGfDrCAST/
    • OMFG is it possible for the council to do anything without a bunch of armchair experts moaning about it? The library refurb is great news, as it's lovely but completely shagged out - the toilets don't even work reliably. Other libraries in the area will be open longer house during the closure. July is a rubbish time to begin a refurb because it's just before the entire construction sector goes on summer holiday, and it would mean delaying the work another 8 months.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...