Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Yes, why don't we all wear something that will be of significance only to eachother?


Mr Batdog could wear an enormous cloak, I could bring my enormous handbag, Mr Mikewbate could bring some dodgey mags, our two beautiful enfianced ladies could wear veils, Crystal and Keef could carry a pint, Mr Ant could carry a baby, and have a vomit stain on his shoulder (hold on, actually that could be most of Lordship lane). Should we carry on further with this idea - or is it not a good plan?


DM

ok, we've got an area so it's game on. I've highlighted what's needed in the original post so if you can assist that's fantastic and don't forget to drop by the Crystal Palace Tavern on Friday 13th April to have a drink and give contributions for the gazebo to Mockney. Just ask behind the bar who the forum people are.


The organisers of the fair will be needing a hand on the day to, they'll be posting details on here again soon so if you want to get involved in a community event on a you're more than welcome, in fact, you're actively encouraged.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...