Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm curious to know how the parking attendant is supposed to kn ow that you are a long standing customer who spends thousands of pounds in the shop. You were warned. you ignored the warning. You should pay up. If you don't want a parking faff, shop online. My daughter has a toddler and a baby and has, before now, not been able to find a parent and baby space which is ridiculous. I don't think the manager should have cancelled your ticket. What is the point of notices and warnings if drivers can ignore them?

Ah KalamityKel, I remember up to the age of 11, every Saturday morning, walking the mile and half each way with my Mother to the weekly market, and then walking back carrying a bag of spuds or something. There's no doubting the rise of the big supermarket has followed the rise of the car, and that the rise of the car has made us lazy. On the other hand, life is far busier too.


On parking. In Rye Lane on any Saturday, Morrison's car park is full. And you have to wait for spaces. I have never seen Sainsburrys car park full. There is always space at the back of the car park on busy days and even if it were full, I can't see why the OP couldn't wait for a space to become free.

I find it impossible to believe that there were no other spaces free yet miraculously there was a parent and child space free right by the front door. As a mum with a small toddler I only manage to bag one of those about 20% of the time I visit. It really makes me cross to think that people are just parking there with no small children in tow while I have to negotiate the length of the car park with a 2-year-old. I really can't understand how the OP can come on the forum to complain about this after having been warned of the consequences by a member of staff! Totally deserved IMO. I wish they gave out tickets every time, or clamped wheels.
I had heard about the avocado and egg debacle a while ago. Dare I suggest that you learn how to pick an avocado and check the dates on the things you buy. Sainsbury's was not to blame for the eggs as you say they were still in date. I can't belive anyone would drive to a shop just for an avocado anyway!!

I'll take that as a compliment Alex K! I think.


And Robert Poste's Child: No, not a comedy sketch. I have no gifts in that direction, sadly.


the-e-dealer: It was delicious, believe me - I could send you the recipe. There's also my salmon and rhubarb D'bacle, but you don't want to hear about that...


Well, I think I've been caught bang to rights. I will be more considerate in future. Many of you have made good points. But I still feel Sainsbury's and other supermarkets shouldn't be fining their customers! Especially via this evil private parking company.

Amazed they cancelled it in those circumstances. Parking there is basically sticking two fingers up at mothers and fathers who greatly appreciate the extra space while trying to turn car seats into buggies in preparation for dragging their little darlings around the supermarket. No none takes their child to a supermarket by choice so, next time, perhaps you'll be a little less unfeeling. These spaces are there in a spirit of community of which you clearly seem to have very little.
I think that's a really good point about car seats. Gone are the days where children can just climb in and babies can be kept on a lap. Putting seatbelts on children and putting babies into car seats all require room to do so. And the spaces elsewhere are barely wide enough to get a vehicle in. I've often have to 'squeeze' out of my vehicle. I can absolutely understand why wider parking spaces exist for those with small children. We can debate where they should be located, but fundamentally they exist for good reason.
There is no reason for parent and child spaces to be near the entrance- most people at that time of life are fit and healthy. When I had mine it was baby under the arm whilst folding the buggy to get on the bus and keeping hold of the toddler. And coming back there was the shopping to deal with as well. I know that parents these days are older but they do not need to be on a par with disabled people and given spaces near the entrance -stick them at the back- the walk will do you good!

buddug Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Well, I think I've been caught bang to rights. I

> will be more considerate in future. Many of you

> have made good points.



Buddug, it's so refreshing to see someone on the Forum admit others have a valid point of view and that they've been caught bang to rights, rather than egotistically refuting any opinion that differs from their own. Seems it takes a girl to be man enough to take it on the chin!

I thought the avocado thing felt like it was a story I'm afaid.


I'd never have time to do that - I'd just bin anything I brought which was rotten or past use by and check next time.


I forgot Ice today (and I really wanted some) - couldn't go back - so trying small Tesco tonight.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
    • There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda and far more across their briefs than any minister I've seen in years. The consensus was that Labour are so unpopular and untrusted by the electorate already, as are the Conservatives, that breaking the manifesto pledge on income tax wouldn't drive their approval ratings any lower, so they should, and I quote, 'Roll The Dice', hope for the best and see where we are in a couple of years time. As a strategy, i don't know whether I find that quite worrying or just an honest appraisal of what most governments actually do in practice.
    • They are a third of the way through their term Earl. It's no good blaming other people anymore. They only have three years left to fix what is now their own mess. And its not just lies in the manifesto. There were lies at the last budget too, when they said that was it, they weren't coming back for more tax and more borrowing. They'd already blamed the increase in NIC taxes on what they claimed was a thorough investigation. They either knew everything then or they lied about that too .   They need to stop lying and start behaving. If they don't the next government won't be theirs, it will be led by Nigel Farage.  They have to turn it round rapidly. Blaming other people, telling lies and breaking promises isn't going to cut it any more.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...