Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Apparently someone got off the 197 bus around 3:30pm walked in front of the bus, got hit by a passing car, flew over the bonnet and was then dragged under another car. He was taken away in an ambulance according to my source, so lets hope he is going to be ok.

Nero Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That sounds horrid. And that's why I wait for the

> green man and try to cross at a zebra. I see mums

> with prams and kids in tow scurrying across LL and

> I think 'why not just go to the crossing?'.


Although if the accident was near the Harvester, as opposed to the Plough, that junction has no pedestrian crossings. To get from the Harvester to Cox's Walk on other side of the road safely, you'd have to walk a couple of hundred metres to the crossing beyond Melford Road and then walk another few hundred metres back the way to the crossing near Underhill Road and then back down the road again. And you'd still have had to cross two roads without the benefit of a green man. I can see why someone just crossed here. Further down LL where there are numerous crossings, it's harder to excuse - especially where kids are around.


I'm guessing traffic flow on the South Circular is why the junction doesn't have any pedestrian features that allow pedestrians to fully cross a road. If you know the sequencing, you can just about time it to cross to the traffic light 'island' and wait but it's definitely not a pedestrian friendly area.

I did notice a certain disturbance up my end today and wondered briefly what it was, but not urgently enough to stumble to the window*.


Applespider makes a useful point, however. Although I've crossed there every week for a year and not got dead yet, it's a particularly murderous junction. Since at least February, it's been on the map of 'sites without pedestrian phases', marked as requiring modernization, suggesting TfL might be going to do something about it.


I am pessimistic. The reason for this pessimism is that the Grove** junction used, until fairly recently, to have a pedestrian phase (a fraction of a minute in which all the vehicles were supposed to be stopped), but this has vanished. Turning the phasings back, and possibly upsetting the more infanticidal motorist, is presumably an option, but clearly not their favourite, so they put it on a map instead.


Blinkered optimists might thing that being on the map is a good thing. But there are 140 other junctions on the map, all of them against the Department of Transport's guidelines. And, although TfL were very keen about compliance, they were only this bold:


Our next step is to develop a framework for selecting which of these should be prioritised for review. This will be based on an analysis of pedestrian accidents at these junctions, current traffic volumes and consideration of what effect providing a pedestrian phase would have on traffic operations and congestion on the road network and how this might be mitigated. This information will be made available in spring 2008.


Forgive me if I'm wrong, but that's not three steps from fixing anything. That's just about working out how to work out which ones are going to get on the list they'll be having a think about considering. Naturally, no such report has emerged (see here), and frameworks still butter no parsnips.


If I had a conscience, I might think of stirring TfL with some sort of campaign, but I'm allergic to futility and have seen enough vacuous boilerplate to last a lifetime. I have no objection, however, to any bright young optimists following this up. Not, if my experience of bright young optimists is anything to go by, that they will.



*None of the following is about buses or Crystal Palace Road. If you don't like it, skip it.

**The Grove is the large and proper pub that lent its name to the junction and is currently being forced to masquerade as a peeling 'Harvester'.

Many years ago there was a campaign to get a green man phase on these lights, This stemed from the local community and went to Southwark's Traffic Management Section. They tried to get something implimented but because road came under (then) Ministry of Transport and was being designated a 'red route' they were not interested.

Suggest that our MP should take it up again or Boris.

I walked past this incident yesterday evening around 6pm and spoke to a senior officer who was getting a bar of chocolate in one of the shops opposite and he said it was a man of around 40 who'd gotten run over. It looked very bad and he didn't think the guy would make it.


How many more road accidents at this junction will it take before something is done about it?

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I walked past this incident yesterday evening

> around 6pm and spoke to a senior officer who was

> getting a bar of chocolate in one of the shops.....


I hope he wasn't in uniform. (6)

There was another accident there a few months ago, even if there was a crossing there people are to lazy to walk to a safe place to cross, also I am amazed the amount of people that run from the other side of the road infront of buses because they missed them.

Horsebox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jah Lush Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I walked past this incident yesterday evening

> > around 6pm and spoke to a senior officer who

> was

> > getting a bar of chocolate in one of the

> shops.....

>

> I hope he wasn't in uniform. (6)



Maybe he was on duty and he was diabetic and forgot his sweets and didn't have a change of clothes with him...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Did you try the emergency number posted above? It mentions lift breakdowns over the festive period outside the advertised  times. Hope you got it sorted x
    • People working in shops should not be "attempting to do the bill in their head." Nor if questioned should they be  trying to "get to an agreeable number." They should be actually (not trying to) getting to the correct number. I'm afraid in many cases it is clearly more than incorrect arithmetic. One New Year's Eve in a restaurant (not in East Dulwich but quite near it) two of us were charged for thirty poppadoms. We were quite merry when the bill came, but not so merry as to not notice something amiss. Unfortunately we have had similar things happen in a well established East Dulwich restaurant we no longer use. There is also a shop in East Dulwich which is open late at night. It used not to display prices on its goods (that may have changed). On querying the bill, we several times found a mistake had been made. Once we were charged twice for the same goods. There is a limit to how many times you can accept a "mistake".  There is also a limit to how many times you can accept the "friendly" sweet talking after it.
    • Adapted not forced.  As have numerous species around the world.  Sort of thing that Attenborough features.  Domestic dogs another good example - hung around communities for food and then we become the leader of the pack.  Not sure how long it will take foxes to domesticate, but some will be well on their way.    Raccoons also on the way https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1j8j48e5z2o
    • My memory, admittedly not very reliable these days, places the shop on the block on the left hand side just before Burgess Park going towards Camberwell. Have also found a reference to Franklins Antiques being located at 157 Camberwell Road which is on that block. This is a screen shot obtained from Google maps of that address which accords with my memory except the entrance door was on the right hand side, where the grey door is, rather than in the centre.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...