Jump to content

Recommended Posts

ChavWivaLawDegree Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> When it said in the bible that the meek would

> inherit the earth, I think JC got it slightly

> wrong, because it seems the tight-arsed whingers

> have inherited the earth and shoved all the weird

> and wonderful, non-conformists down some big pit

> somewhere.


"Wonderful non-conformists"? - when you read do you move your lips?

Just for the record, I highly sympathise with anyone who has had abuse from this guy, especially if it was kids or a lady walking alone after dark or whatever. I don't doubt at all what people have said. I just find it difficult to understand the hateful bile some people have spouted about someone who is clearly not well. Yes you could argue that they should be gettins treatment somewhere, but your venom should be aimed at a system, not the results of it.

If you get trapped in a lift with a man who spends the hour shouting "I'M A TOMATO.. I'M A TOMATO.." whilst rolling alternate trouser legs up and down and saluting - then in all probability most people would go home and tell their other half that they got stuck in a lift with a 'nutter'. Whatever.


But it would be in poor taste to devote a snigger-thon thread to him on a public website. Especially if he lived on your street.

The "system" IS working... However the authorities do not have a crystal ball. I posted Whistling Man's ASBO terms on this forum a couple of days ago. If you see him being threatening, drunk, noisy... call the council or the safer neighbourhood team. They will take the appropriate measures.

I cannot understand the bleeding heart liberal leanings of some people on here, who would rather protect some undeserving low life troublesome stalker who has put absolutely nothing into the society which they live, other than costs of housing feeding, and defending when they eventually get to court for their anti-social behaviour.


My sympathy lies with Jimmytwotimes when he was desperate there was no support from the council where as if he had been like the intimidating nutter he would have got housed no question.


Asset and Annaj and Chav defended this creep and all credit to them for their humanity, but he has not lived as their close neighbour, and they have not been stalked to their home, or sat next to him on the bus and been intimidated by the obnoxious lout like many have.


As resources are finite I would rather Jimmytwotimes was served positively by the welfare state, than the antisocial asbo collectors who in my mind should be put to work helping in the community rather than fragmenting it by their disgraceful carryings on. The chances are the ones who have just left Whateley rd have probably been re-housed on several occasions and have received more than their fair share of commitment from the council.


In my opinion once they have been housed and then they lose it for their misbehaviour, that house should be given to the Jimmytwotimes variety of individual who needs a helping hand, and the once in his life time need is taken care of. Otherwise the system seems to encourage outrageous behaviour.


Sorry if I come over as a "total tool" Keef which incidentally made me laugh out loud, and its making me chuckle as I write we shall just have to agree to differ.


I am all for the welfare state where deserving cases are looked after, but not for the individuals who make a career of being anti-social.

Yes I agree Keef, I'm not defending him or his actions particularly, just feeling uncomfortable with people wishing him a violent death and other unpleasant things.



Exactly.

My post was not intended to belittle anyone's suffering or defend antisocial behaviour, only to point out that I found the some of the attitudes on this thread deeply unpleasant.

If there were stocks on Goose Green (like I have suggested on previous posts) they would all be put there for a few days and the community could hit back in a socially approved way.


It could stimulate new local businesses, rotten egg and tomato suppliers for example would clean up.


It would make us all feel so much better if we could issue some payback to the local miscreants.

We would all know the punishment was fitting the crime, and justice would be seen to be done.


The money raised could go to rehousing them and they would be released as soon as there was sufficient money to look after them, having of course paid out the compensation to the people who had suffered any indignities metred out by them.


We could hire Keefs band, and give Bon3yard a stall to sell his gourmet snacks, it would be a national ed holiday.

We could have a bonfire, it's always nice to see a blaze.


A win win situation, with all the visiting from out of towners spending their hard tourist currency.


I might run for mayor of ED next year, ......Boris beware.

I think you are confusing your idea of stocks with the kind that appeared in DC Thomson comics Steve T


A lot more than rotten tomatoes were thrown at people. In fact not everything got thrown.. In fact....


Actually best just forget the whole idea of stocks as pretty barbaric (much like a lot of society at that point in time)

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "Sweet"girl, you have anonymity on here, at least

> grant this human being the same right, as I think

> any news story would until he's actually been

> convicted of something, which he probably won't

> be!

>

> FFS




Agree with this - like on this thread


http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,154783,155161#msg-155161

Why is it OK to refer very specifically to someone so that everyone knows who they are as long as they are attributed a nickname, but not to refer to their real name? I'm not sure about this myself, I know perhaps you could then google them or something whilst 'The Whistler' woouldn't have quite the same results. Don't know if I'm being a bit thick and missing something here, because somehow 'naming and shaming' feels a bit wrong to me but I couldn't quite put my finger on why (other than perhaps it 'humanises' them so I feel less comfortable talking about them!).



P.S. to clear up potential confusion if people trawl through my previous posts in order to determine the integrity of my character before deciding how to respond to my post, my other half nicked my profile when posting before (the thought of me on a bicycle in central London is truly terrifying).

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
    • I perceive the problem.simply as spending too much without first shoring up the economy.  If the government had reduced borrowing,  and as much as most hate the idea, reduced government deiartment spending (so called austerity) and not bowed to union pressures for pay rises, then encouraged businesses to grow, extra cash would have entered the coffers and at a later stage when the economy was in a stronger position rises in NI or taxes would have a lesser impact, but instead Reeves turned that on its head by increasing ni which has killed growth, increased prices and shimmied the economy.  What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???     
    • That petition is bananas.   If you want a youth centre there pay the landlord the same rent a Londis would and build it yourself or shut the f**k up to be honest. Wasting our MPs time with this trivial nonsense is appalling. If your kids are still out at 1am on a school night you've got bigger problems than vapes and booze and hot sausage rolls. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...