Jump to content

Recommended Posts

In that case why would you inform a public forum read by local people about "what could have been an innocent mistake"?


Sorry Sue to keep banging on about this, it's really not not personal, and it's very clear that your post was well intentioned, but it just worries me that something of this nature can be aired in such a public way. People who work directly with the public are so vulnerable to accusations which they are usually unaware of and unable to defend.


Maybe I feel so strongly about it becauase I am from a working class background, I still have friends and family who work in shops and can identify more with the shop workers than with you. Again, sorry. I guess we will never agree on this one.


I am dipping out of this one now. Adios.

BlueOne Wrote:

> Maybe I feel so strongly about it becauase I am

> from a working class background, I still have

> friends and family who work in shops and can

> identify more with the shop workers than with you.

> Again, sorry. I guess we will never agree on this

> one.


xxxxxx


Excuse me ?!?!?!


How do you know what my background is?


I have also worked in shops!


:-S

BlueOne Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In that case why would you inform a public forum

> read by local people about "what could have been

> an innocent mistake"?

>

>xxxxxx


Because a) It might not have been an innocent mistake and b) If it was, then the person who made such a basic mistake as not giving somebody their cashback could well make that basic mistake with another customer.


I therefore thought it worth sharing.


For God's sake - I haven't identified the assistant in any way whatsoever, I haven't got a vendetta against Somerfield's, I am not suggesting everybody who works in a shop is a thieving working class dreg of society, I am merely suggesting that people be more careful than usual when getting cashback just in case they don't get given it, as that happened to me recently.


Why didn't all these people come out and say similar things on the other very long thread on this forum where Somerfields was a leading player??


Edited to say I use the term working class because another poster did.

BlueOne Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In that case why would you inform a public forum

> read by local people about "what could have been

> an innocent mistake"?

>


Because whether it was an innocent mistake or not, Sue didn't get her cashback. Therefore she's warning people to make sure they get the cashback they've asked for. Anything you infer beyond this is your problem, not Sue's.


: P

I really do not see the problem with Sue's post, she simply gave a warning about something that may or may not have been a genuine mistake. She was very clear that that it may have been a genuine mistake.


I cant believe the grief she has had from certain people!

I'm largely on Sue's side on the wider point - but I think it's disingenuous to not "get" why people think the post was not accusatory rather than simple warning


The title alone - "Somerfield again..." suggests an implicit previous conviction and that they haven't learned a lesson which just isn't the case.


That so many people who have been cloned were also in Somerfield implies nothing more than lots of people go to a high profile supermarket. They have not been confirmed as the source of anything (although I take on board what Sue says re: her bank's comments)


Starting a new thread also suggests an event of some magnitude more than adding to previous threads...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • That is almost too ridiculous to answer but I'll take the bait. You are comparing a national charity with one branch of a small charity. Cats Protection has around 34 dedicated rehoming centres. CHAT has two, Lewisham & Canning Town and a sanctuary in Sussex. So if Cats Protection have homed 34,000 cats, thats an average of 1000 per branch. From memory this years total so far for Lewisham CHAT was over 980. I saw a few homed this weekend so we may well reach 1000 for this year. The same as Cats Protection. No need for head scratching.    
    • Actually, if it was factory fitted then it's location would be documented. It's the fact that it can be fitted in different places which means that it's difficult for thieves to locate. 
    • OK, good suggestion and it appears that the after-market price is about £260. But if that that was fitted ex-factory then the cost would be substantially less and certainly a small fraction of the price of a high-end car.
    • The Ambassador is back gifting games galore. Merry Christmas everyone!  Week 17 fixtures...   Friday 26th December Manchester United v Newcastle United   Saturday 27th December Nottingham Forest v Manchester City Arsenal v Brighton & Hove Albion Brentford v AFC Bournemouth Burnley v Everton Liverpool v Wolverhampton Wanderers West Ham United v Fulham Chelsea v Aston Villa   Sunday 28th December Sunderland v Leeds United Crystal Palace v Tottenham Hotspur   Tuesday 30th December Burnley v Newcastle United Chelsea v AFC Bournemouth Nottingham Forest v Everton West Ham United v Brighton & Hove Albion Arsenal v Aston Villa Manchester United v Wolverhampton Wanderers   Thursday 1st January Crystal Palace v Fulham Liverpool v Leeds United Brentford v Tottenham Hotspur Sunderland v Manchester City
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...