Jump to content

Has the ED housing market reached the bottom yet ( II )


snorky

Recommended Posts

I'm not convinced the top end of the market will bounce back first this time. The banking industry and the city have been hit really hard in the current recession. We also have a crash in oil prices, which has undermined the market in uber-prime central London, where most of the purchases are funded by petrodollars.


Also, if you look at rental yields as a guide to value, they tend to be better in cheaper parts of the market that haven't become as overinflated by the credit boom. House prices to salary ratios are lower in poor parts of London too. This means that cheaper bits of London are going to tempt BTL investors before more expensive areas, and affordability will return to normal in poorer areas too.


I'd guess East Dulwich is somewhere in the middle between posh London's excessive prices and grimy undesirable London, so I think East Dulwich will put in an average performance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also bear in mind that when the crash is over, there will be a large number of first time buyers, who have all been saving their cash, waiting for the right time to buy. So yeah, I guess the lower end of the market could be the first to bounce back!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Also bear in mind that when the crash is over,

> there will be a large number of first time buyers,

> who have all been saving their cash, waiting for

> the right time to buy. So yeah, I guess the lower

> end of the market could be the first to bounce

> back!


they may well have been saving their cash, but from now on banks will be keeping salary multiples to less than 3.5 and insisting on deposits of 20% (or making mortgages cripplingly expensive at higher loan-to-value ratios) until the risks to banks of further house price falls have passed. This means the market won't truly recover until house prices revert to historic salary multiples and first-time buyers without heaps of cash can afford to buy again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, at the moment you'll find it hard to get any mortgage if you don't have a 20% deposit. But you can still get loans for around 4x salary, and at 5% fixed for 2 or 3 years... it's not all that bad really. I know several potential first time buyers who are wondering whether to take the plunge this year.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure there are buyers around. It's a myth that nobody buys in a crash. In reality people keep buying all the way through it, always hoping they've timed the bottom about right. It's also a myth that nobody can sell - selling is easy if you're prepared to undercut the competition.


A lot of people seem to be saying that it's a bad time to sell, but I think the opposite might be true. House prices are still much higher than historical norms when measured against salaries or rents. They're still well above fair value, so anyone selling now can still lock in profit from the boom. But i think the psychological pain of taking a hit on last year's values is too much for most sellers, which is probably why only those who feel forced to sell will do so. In the fullness of time, I think today's forced sellers will thank their lucky stars they got out so near the peak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Just for the picture over the river, our house prices have not dropped. Not a pound or Euro. Not in the cheaper areas or the posh ones. Our newspaper ads still plug 3 bed semis in grey suburbs for ?330,000 just the same as at the peak, so presumably some remote places have dropped a lot to change the average but not anywhere popular. I presume Dulwich is the same although when I was looking 15 years ago I found it to be the best value area of all so probably relatively still is. If you drive a few miles to Blackheath it's back to the maximum but I looked all over London and only ended up back here as Putney proved just beyond my means after losing a property at the last minute there. Blackheath however was way off the radar.


With all the tricks the government are pulling (sorry, the bank of England is independent isn't it) they are stringing the boom out endlessly by artificially lowering interest payments (that can't last 25 years can it?) and shovelling our cash to mortgage firms supposedly to lend to buyers but being spent on bonuses. The conditions that fuelled the credit/debt mountain are now being increased to deepen the hole even further, which explains why there has been no price correction north of the river at least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

SteveT


If you read the head post in the Residential section it reads "This section is purely a listing of properties, if you want to discuss or get advice on local properties please use an alternative relevant section."


If you have an issue with that please contact me directly and do not take a thread off topic. Rude man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kingsbury David Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Just for the picture over the river, our house

> prices have not dropped. Not a pound or Euro. Not

> in the cheaper areas or the posh ones. Our

> newspaper ads still plug 3 bed semis in grey

> suburbs for ?330,000 just the same as at the peak,

> so presumably some remote places have dropped a

> lot to change the average but not anywhere

> popular. I presume Dulwich is the same although

> when I was looking 15 years ago I found it to be

> the best value area of all so probably relatively

> still is. If you drive a few miles to Blackheath

> it's back to the maximum but I looked all over

> London and only ended up back here as Putney

> proved just beyond my means after losing a

> property at the last minute there. Blackheath

> however was way off the radar.

>

> With all the tricks the government are pulling

> (sorry, the bank of England is independent isn't

> it) they are stringing the boom out endlessly by

> artificially lowering interest payments (that

> can't last 25 years can it?) and shovelling our

> cash to mortgage firms supposedly to lend to

> buyers but being spent on bonuses. The conditions

> that fuelled the credit/debt mountain are now

> being increased to deepen the hole even further,

> which explains why there has been no price

> correction north of the river at least.


Newspaper ads are just ads. Just because they don't appear to drop their price, doesn't mean that actual selling prices aren't dropping. You highlight how people can easily be misled by sales techniques.


Similarly, how can they not have dropped in Euro terms when the Euro is so much stronger than last year?! That is nonsense.


Every index points that actual sale prices are dropping and have dropped for high end, low end, popular, rough, north, south, houses, flats etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kingsbury David Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Just for the picture over the river, our house

> prices have not dropped. Not a pound or Euro. Not

> in the cheaper areas or the posh ones. Our

> newspaper ads still plug 3 bed semis in grey

> suburbs for ?330,000 just the same as at the peak,

> so presumably some remote places have dropped a

> lot to change the average but not anywhere

> popular. I presume Dulwich is the same although

> when I was looking 15 years ago I found it to be

> the best value area of all so probably relatively

> still is. If you drive a few miles to Blackheath

> it's back to the maximum but I looked all over

> London and only ended up back here as Putney

> proved just beyond my means after losing a

> property at the last minute there. Blackheath

> however was way off the radar.

>

> With all the tricks the government are pulling

> (sorry, the bank of England is independent isn't

> it) they are stringing the boom out endlessly by

> artificially lowering interest payments (that

> can't last 25 years can it?) and shovelling our

> cash to mortgage firms supposedly to lend to

> buyers but being spent on bonuses. The conditions

> that fuelled the credit/debt mountain are now

> being increased to deepen the hole even further,

> which explains why there has been no price

> correction north of the river at least.



You're probably just looking at asking prices, which paint a misleading picture. They are well above the level at which deals are actually being struck, and of course those properties that do sell quickly disappear from the listings - you moostly see ads for the stuff that's got stuck on the market because it's overpriced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tommy the problem is you really need a lot, and I mean a lot, of equity plus huge job security to trade up (let alone the factor that there is almost no movement in the market anyway and mortgages are toughto get) especialy when you add in all fees/stampduty etc...to illustrate...."a falling market gives you a great opportunity to trade up" ..mmm maybe


Your place ?500,000 at the peak lets say 20% fall in prices...= lost ?100,000


Fancy a house that was ?750,000 at peak...lost = ?150,000


stamp duty ?40ish + fees etc....... eats up your ?50K 'gain' and you've probably had to increase your mortgage in a very wobbly job market


Really, you have to be doubling your house value or be in the ?1m+ value bracket to really gain from trading up at the mo.....Clearly if you were planning on moving anyway, havejob security and a lot of equity then you're going to be getting a bit more bang for your buck

Link to comment
Share on other sites

tommy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Anyone with equity in E.D looking to take

> advantage of low interest rates and "trading up"

> locally ?


It's very difficult to trade up at the momen%t because most people have declining equity as a result of falling prices, and you need minimum 20% equity to get a decent mortgage deal. E.g. someone who had 40% equity at peak now only has 20% equity, so can't get a mortgage on anything more expensive than their current house. The mortgage drought has pretty much put a complete stop to trading up for all but the richest or those who've owned their home for many years and consequently have a tiny loan to value ratio or own outright.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

macroban Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> > someone who had 40% equity at peak now only has

> 20% equity

>

> 25%?


if prices have fallen 20%, then 40% equity becomes 25% equity. If prices have fallen 25%, 40% equity becomes 20% equity. So it depends on how much prices have fallen.


Moving can be quite expensive. When you factor in all the costs, particularly stamp duty, then trading up is even harder. Add to that the difficulty of completing a chain at the moment. The few people who are trading up at the moment are probably those who sold a while ago and have been waiting in rented homes for prices to fall.


Speaking of trading up, I wonder if people tend to trade out of east dulwich rather than staying here and trading up?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm, good points on trading up. Yes, it depends on lots of factors as mentioned - esp I feel the completion of a chain at the moment


I think selling a property that has been improved and buying a larger property in need of work might still be worthwhile as a long term project, esp if you can fix your mortgage now for a few years

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With experience of buying a property in need of work - I would not recommend this as an easy option, or even a money saving one. There is a huge hassle factor and in terms of bargaining with builders, there is only one winner.

Buy a house needing work if you want to put your own stamp on it by all means, but I don't think you will necessarily enjoy the experience, although the finished product will hopefully be worthwhile, and I'd say you should only do it if you intend to stay in the property long term, and have a big budget kept back from the purchase, thus avoiding stress if things go over budget.

Some good points made on trading up - certainly quantifies the cost of doing so which is very interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> With experience of buying a property in need of

> work - I would not recommend this as an easy

> option, or even a money saving one. There is a

> huge hassle factor and in terms of bargaining with

> builders, there is only one winner.

> Buy a house needing work if you want to put your

> own stamp on it by all means, but I don't think

> you will necessarily enjoy the experience,

> although the finished product will hopefully be

> worthwhile, and I'd say you should only do it if

> you intend to stay in the property long term, and

> have a big budget kept back from the purchase,

> thus avoiding stress if things go over budget.

> Some good points made on trading up - certainly

> quantifies the cost of doing so which is very

> interesting.


absolutely. The days of making a sarah-beaney-style quick profit are well and truly over - thank god. Perhaps we'll go back to thinking of houses simply as places to live rather than cash machines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • More interested in the future than the past. 
    • The plans The developer Berkeley Homes have submitted a planning application to redevelop the Aylesham Centre close to the junction of Peckham High Street and Rye Lane, containing Morrison’s supermarket, car park, & petrol station, Aylesham shopping arcade and most of that side of Rye Lane between Hanover Park and Peckham High Street. The application is for a mixed housing, retail, leisure and commercial development, in buildings ranging from 5 to 20 storeys. Impact Local people who have studied the detailed plans think that the development would dominate the historic town centre which has evolved since the 18th century, and would ruin the Conservation Area which was awarded in 2011 'to preserve and enhance its character and appearance'. More than 65% of the homes to be built in this unimaginative over-bearing development will be unaffordable by most people who live in Southwark, and provide inadequate open and green space for this part of Peckham. Need for discussion This is such an important issue for south London that it needs wide discussion before the Council Planning Committee takes its decision (not before next Spring). A free on-line talk and discussion to clarify the heritage issues we all need to think about is being held on Monday 11th November 7-8.30pm. All will be welcome. Please register on this link: https://Defend-Peckhams-Heritage-2024.eventbrite.co.uk There are several other key issues raised by the plans which are being examined in the Aylesham Community Action (ACA) campaign. You can find the link to all that and other useful information here: www.linktr.ee/acapeckham The zoom session is being arranged by Peckham Heritage the local group that has grown from the community work alongside the restoration of nine historic buildings in Peckham High Street through the Townscape Heritage Initiative. We hope that EDF members who value local heritage will be able to attend the session to hear and take part in the discussion, and report back to this topic so the discussion can continue.
    • I did see a few Victoria bound 185's on East Dulwich road around 5pm this evening. Coming from the Rye end and heading toward Goose green
    • I cant quite pinpoint where she is exactly. But currently notice I am not hearing her this evening!! She has a microphone? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...