Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Whittingstalls a Dorset Lad, which makes him less sexy of course. Crawford in Condorman I can understand and Julian Rhind Tutt played the super sexy doctor who all women lusted after so I fear thats a disqualification....now if it was the hairy Guy Secretan...!

Jessica Hynes nee Stevenson is who you're all thinking of... Cassius you've obv not seen her recently if you think she's well covered - while not stick thin she's hardly that big!


Prob for another thread but Daisy in Spaced is one of my TV show characters I think are like me/I could have been!!


I still have a lil bit of a thing for Phillip Schofield....

Nigella Lawson told a Newspaper the other day that Husband and official lucky sod Charles Saatchi told her of a dream he'd had where he'd walked in on Nigella getting raw with of all people Steve Coppell! It was more the fact that CS knew who Coppell was that intrigued me rather than his dreaming of him ravishing the fair Nigella.

"Amanda Platell"


Jah, did you read the story about her at some party up at the labour conference.

She apparently saw the Sky anchor and went over to him where there was some nerdy bloke whom she took to be a junior spin doctor or researcher standing by them, not obeying the law that minkies should sod off when celebs start talking.


She gave him a withering look and said something on the lines of "why are you still here? Shoo" Then leaned over to grab his pass in order to berate him by name, only to see the words "James Murdoch" written on it.


Oops!!!! Made me chuckle anyway.

At eight years old, I was utterly smitten with Julie Andrews after seeing The Sound Of Music.

At the time I was taught by nuns.

I also took to having a dream about her where I rescued her from a burning building, becoming fatally injured in the process and dying in her arms.

And at the time the only member of the Freud family I was aware of was Clement.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...