Jump to content

Recommended Posts

TillieTrotter Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm sort of with you there PGC. I find him

> fascinating. He would be on top of my list of

> dinner guests....not sure I'd give him any pudding

> though:-$


I'm assuming you're not referring to the bread and butter variety?

Although with the way it's going on here at the moment, you might well be.

Round here, the most innocent remark? It couldn't be more loaded.

Why it's as loaded with innuendo as the staff of an Italian suppository factory, going on a charabanc outing with the cast of Carry On At Your Convenience.

Buulimey O'Reilly.

TillieTrotter Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That was indeed loaded with innuendo.....must not

> post after red wine consumption.


Oh, but I insist you promise never to post without a skinful of the good stuff.

For my part I'll do my best to ensure a supply of large bottles of Peronni are kept chilled in Honaloochie Towers.

It all helps to stoke our muse. Wouldn't mind someone stoking my muse. Snigger.

I've just image-googled Harvey Smith and come up with a huge variety of people, a youngish scruffy bloke, and oldish beardy bloke and a bloke on a horse whom I'm guessing is whom you mean...??? Or not?


Drunken posting is definitely to be encouraged. Unlike drunken conversation it's still there the next day to assist your memory of the silly things you've done and said.

Why is it only men who fancy cartoon/computer generated figures?


You boys are weird!



I've never met a woman so far who had a crush on He-Man, for example.


Or am I wrong? Any women out here fancying cartoon figures?


Edit: DOH! just found the other thread...

VeryBerryCherry Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes but think of how many different shoes you'd

> get to buy before you came close to men's gadget

> and car fixation. B)



VBC - I think I may be there. And handbags too. I has a room of 'em in my house.

Aah - you'll never know.




[nice collar - damn bell is a bit loud at 4 am]



Well yah boo sucks to you then. (pouts)


I love the way this thread has turned into a skirmish in the war of the sexes. Love it! Wait till you can see the whites of their eyes, ladies.


[Gosh, sorry about that. Bell coming off as soon as I can get him in a room with some secateurs]

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...