Jump to content

Recommended Posts

If he's injured then he's injured but I'd love to see Ox-C along with ALL the newer caps run at the Uruguayans - could be sensational. They can do the same without him - be positive and let Spain be the lesson for cautious keep-ball. Suarez is still unfit - attack, attack, attack-attack-attack.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> He doesn't look fit either. He struggled in the

> second half of the last match.


Gerrard great with the ball, and I thought he passed it very well against Italy.


But without the ball - contribution to winning the ball back is pretty low...


Henderson helps the midfield a lot, more effective than Lampard in terms of defence.


I think England can do it.

I appreciate Henderson's contribution, especially for Liverpool this season, but would love to see Ross Barclay given a proper midfield berth in a slight change of system.


For me, RB is one of very few England players with genuine world class potential in the England set up. Poise and guile on the ball.

Interesting article from the FT:


http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/c7df3466-f6fa-11e3-9e9d-00144feabdc0.html#axzz355n1B3Bo


The thing that really jumped out at me was Italy's pass completion percentage - the highest ever recorded - and what that said about England's lack of a ball winner in central midfield, but also (not in the article) that Italy played very, very well, and England's performance should be seen in that context.


All irrelevant now - we just have to beat Uruguay. My prediction - Suarez to be sent off for knifing Gerrard off the ball.


PS - Paul Mariner interesting fact - he played Lancashire youth cricket with Bill Beaumont, later Grand Slam winning England rugby captain.

titch juicy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I appreciate Henderson's contribution, especially

> for Liverpool this season, but would love to see

> Ross Barclay given a proper midfield berth in a

> slight change of system.

>

> For me, RB is one of very few England players with

> genuine world class potential in the England set

> up. Poise and guile on the ball.


England need to avoid falling into the same old trap of prioritising attacking midfielders above all else - this has blighted England's progress for a decade.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> titch juicy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I appreciate Henderson's contribution,

> especially

> > for Liverpool this season, but would love to

> see

> > Ross Barclay given a proper midfield berth in a

> > slight change of system.

> >

> > For me, RB is one of very few England players

> with

> > genuine world class potential in the England

> set

> > up. Poise and guile on the ball.

>

> England need to avoid falling into the same old

> trap of prioritising attacking midfielders above

> all else - this has blighted England's progress

> for a decade.



I think it was trying to find room for two attacking central midfielders (Gerrard and. Lampard) that was the problem. Now Gerrard looks comfortable in the deeper lying role, a more attacking all round midfielder like Barclay should fit well.


I think we're seeing the novelty factor of Sterling wearing off here. Uruguay look like they have him Sussed on the first half evidence.

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> AQ I think it's an utterly ludicrous position to

> hate Spaniards based on a single facet if their

> society, but that's your right. I started a long

> and boring post about the hypocrisy of this but

> lost the will to live, We'll just take each other

> off our Christmas card lists shall we.



Only just seen this.


I didn't say I hated all Spaniards EP. Just dislike Spain as a country, generally speaking, so was obviously quite pleased by last night's result.


Nothing personal.


I certainly won't be removing you from my Christmas card list!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Alas, poor Toadflax!  And gentle Alkanet.
    • Generally wild flowers which are indigenous to the UK are more likely to be supporting more wild life than introduced species, more commonly found in gardens, simply because wild life hasn't had time to adapt to it. Although of course many introductions which flower will be supporting pollinators more generally. (This would also be true of native as opposed to introduced tree and scrub species). And I suspect plants which are flowering over public space, even if rooted on private private, are being removed to stop them setting seed in public space. [Although many might see that as a good thing if the plants have merits of their own).
    • Good question. I think the benefit of some wild flowers is that they appear earlier in the spring and provide nectar for insects coming out of hibernation. Also, natives have evolved with the insects, some of which can only survive with certain native plants. For example, some species of  caterpillars need a specific native plant for their food. Having said that, I've seen lots of pollinators having a field day on some non native flowers. My bees love my verbena bonariensis for example.
    • Genuine question- are wild flowers/weeds better for wildlife than cultivated flowers? My cultivated flowers and their seeds attract birds, bees and all kinds of insects, maybe more so than wild flowers.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...