Jump to content

Recommended Posts

EDOldie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hmmm, puzzled, it's a pub and it's in E Dulwich.

> Can we only go to gentrified gastroenteritis pubs?


It's not that it isn't "gentrified"... it's because it's a bit of a dump.


It is possible to give a pub a lick of paint every 10-20 years (and dare I suggest an occasional clean) without becoming "gentrified"!

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Get thee to a nunnery.


Or even the Old Nun's Head. We haven't been there. They have an upstairs room - whether they would let us have it? http://london.randomness.org.uk/wiki.cgi?Old_Nun%27s_Head%2C_SE15_3QQ


The space in Hoopers only worked because quite a few people spilt into the main area of the pub.

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Christmas drinks last year were actually a let

> down in terms of numbers, as so many people had

> work parties, so could go either way.


Yeah but it was still a good night. As far as I can recall.


I wouldn't mind +venture. It's a bit of a negative that they don't do beer (except in a bottle for a million pounds a go) but I will manage for one night.


Ps. I am actually going to come to this one instead of just being all opinionated about the venue and then not rocking up. :-$

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> er..."Horse":-$


The Freudians make note of your original post quids.

They also make note that you did not choose the 'edit' option.

"I just never like coming before and getting on my high hores."

A sentiment that does you credit.

To change the subject, does the title of Oliver Stone's latest mean anything to you?

Adventure Bar? No fecking way. Too small, and no proper beer. I'd settle for the any of the following though...The Dog, the Duke, The Clockhouse, The Plough, Magnolia, The Castle, EDT and CPT. I also really like the sound of doing the Wishing Well as it hasn't been done before even if it is in Peckham, it's a lovely old pub and I also think we should add The Ivy House to the list too.

A bar that only sells bottle beer? But, but, that means going to the bar twice as much.


Not that's any of my bees wax, as I never come. Though a Christmas drink in early December sounds quite nice. It won't clash with my work's do, as well, frankly we never have a Christmas knees up. I mean, like never, ever.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...