Jump to content

Recommended Posts

" but if they were meant literally then that's obviously pretty stupid."


we see it time and again in crime threads where people don't want to just deter/frighten off/catch burglars and the like but want to actually shoot/maim people


If someone tells me they were robbed and had an altrecation with the criminal, and the criminal came of worst in a physical stand off, I'm not going to lose much sleep


But when people, in cold light of day, start saying they WANT to.. that's different in my book

Either one would have been quite satisfying to be honest, if he was carrying a knife then runing him over would be safer, either way my first thoughts are not "poor little kid, doing some bad things for a while" I think that we should see more public spirited civic actions like these to be honest - people might feel a bit safer on the streets then.


Oh! and making him eat the phone might have been another option.

I'm surprised no ones given a description, especially with so many people involved. It seems by

OP that after phone was given back the driver mounted the pavement, i'm assuming he/she was aware

this person was being chased but unaware of circumstances.

I would certainly have mown this perp down, then reversed over the corpse - just to be sure. We can always plant a knife afterwards on the mangled, torn body, should there not be one. If it means one more safe iPhone then I think - on balance - it's worth it.
But Bob, spare a thought for the phone shops down Rye lane who would suffer dramatic reductions on profit margins if care free youngsters are prevented from violently mugging people for phones and selling them to those responsible businesses, that vital plethora of second hand technology boothes. We must remember there is a whole stolen phone eco system upon which many of our precious citizens depend to fund a balanced diet, education, a roof and err(oh sorry I mean crack and spliff obvs)

When will the libtards with their stupid gun control laws ever learn. If this young lady had been prominently displaying her AR15 he'd never have even tried, or if he had she could have squeezed off a few rounds in his general direction and job done.


Wake up sheeple, and seize power. I'm certainly voting ukip if it means i can keep a couple of RPG6s in the back of my car for just such an occasion!!

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> When will the libtards with their stupid gun

> control laws ever learn. If this young lady had

> been prominently displaying her AR15 he'd never

> have even tried, or if he had she could have

> squeezed off a few rounds in his general direction

> and job done.

>

> Wake up sheeple, and seize power. I'm certainly

> voting ukip if it means i can keep a couple of

> RPG6s in the back of my car for just such an

> occasion!!



eh?

"Unless you did it with no control or near pedestrians - you're just blocking of the escape"


...and of course it was all done by a seasoned driving professional in a stress free situation, perfect visibility and definitely no hard to see toddlers around, no siree, not a tragedy wainting to happen.


But like I said, one trained bomb dog would have done the job, assuming the subhuman scumbag who had forfeited all human rights, which are only enforced on us by Europe, didn't have that instant drying hard resin to spray on said dog.

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> and won't anyone think of the cats!?!?!



Indeed. You mount the pavement doing your civic duty and you end up squashing a cat and being the subject of a new EDF thread where you're called a heartless bastard.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I would certainly have mown this perp down, then

> reversed over the corpse - just to be sure. We can

> always plant a knife afterwards on the mangled,

> torn body, should there not be one. If it means

> one more safe iPhone then I think - on balance -

> it's worth it.



:-)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Or increase tax.  The freezing of personal allowances is one way, not what I would choose.  On principle I don't care if the rich immigrate.  The main parties could have been more honest before the election.  Reform is deluded.
    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...