Jump to content

Palestinian PR


steveo

Recommended Posts

Saw a photo this morning of a group of Palestinian kids playing on a beach before the Israelis blasted them to smithereens. My how good they must feel about themselves while the world stands by and scratches its balls. Whatever happened to the lessons they should have learned from the treatment they've had to put up with for centuries? And they wonder why sympathy for them is disappearing, if not already evaporated. What is that now 200 to 1 to the Israeli state? Bravo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

vgrant Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There is no erosion of support or sympathy for

> Israel that I can see. Just an hardening of

> opinion for those who have already decided their

> stance.



Maybe not from the US and Western goverments, but by and large there is a swell of public opinion against the Iraelis both here and adbroad. Shamefully the authorities are refusing to take heed, shock. Dare I say the Israelis actions are fast mirroring some of those visited upon them by the like of the Nazis and others over the centuries. They should feel deeply ashamed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dunno - Im not seeing anyone cross over from either side on the basis of the this scuffle.Its only the recent in a long list of territorial scuffles - if anything, given the Syrian situation and the very real threat of proper off the leash nutters banging on Israels doors, I can only see opinions hardening. Sad as it is, nothing has really been done to alleviate the past 40 years of bother there so far, I dont see this incursion making any lasting difference either way.


Maybe its about time TBlair got out of his ermine trimmed board seat at JP Morgan and sprinkled a bit of his magic fairy dust on the region and see if he can fix it - like he did with eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeraq and Afhghanistan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The off the leash nutters will be dealt with soon enough. They're useful idiots for the baathists in sunni iraq, but i can't see them making the same mistake's as they did in 2006.


Plus those nutters are more intertested in toppling the house of Saud (oh the irony) once they've dealt with the shia, which demographically won't happen either.


Short term prognosis for iraq, a nasty prang outside baghdad with a lesser prang on the borders of kurdistan, long term prognosis, 3 iraqs on those lines.

How long the fighting lasts depends on how quickly they agree to divvy up the oil fields rather than fight to retain them.


Syria, ISIS spending most of its time fighting moderate rebels; uneasy peace in the next year or so between them and gov't, some sort of compromise will ensue, but Assad will stay in power, with perhaps increased autonomy for certain regions.


Israel really is a total side issue in this, which works in Israel's favour. Iran and Hamas have had a bit of a falling out, hezbollah are stuck in Syria's civil war and trying to prevent meltdown in Lebanon, and everyone else in the region is too busy, weak and/or paranoid to give this spat a second thought.


As DaveR quoted earlier "when i'm strong why should i compromise"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

vgrant Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Dunno - Im not seeing anyone cross over from

> either side on the basis of the this scuffle.Its

> only the recent in a long list of territorial

> scuffles - if anything, given the Syrian situation

> and the very real threat of proper off the leash

> nutters banging on Israels doors, I can only see

> opinions hardening. Sad as it is, nothing has

> really been done to alleviate the past 40 years of

> bother there so far, I dont see this incursion

> making any lasting difference either way.

>

> Maybe its about time TBlair got out of his ermine

> trimmed board seat at JP Morgan and sprinkled a

> bit of his magic fairy dust on the region and see

> if he can fix it - like he did with

> eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeraq and

> Afhghanistan


I think Blairs peace position revolves around his involvement with gas in Gaza.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know, iv'e been practicing to be a hard cynic for years, i'm told it

stops you crying, and i've got a tap to turn off and on when i choose.


The children killed on the beach was horrendous, I watched this last night,there were so many people,

Journalists filming this, I totally understand the need to let people see what is happening,

But there were so many people the ambulance men couldnt get the doors shut.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No they weren't they were trying to explain why the situation is horrific but not all one way - your sort of complete misrepresentation of what they were saying is completely typical of the black and white hatred rubbish of social media and simplistic naivety at best, at worst it's the smearing rants of the usual suspects. They were, as far as I can see, pointing out that Hamas was as much culpable in this as Israel - albeit without as sophisticated weaponry.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But that isn't true is it?


Saying the weaponry isn't as sophisticated in no way explains just what is happening


The comparison has been made before but if England carpet bombed Ireland because of its actions, would it be ok to say the ira were culpable?


It's no solution to the problem. As Israel isn't actually suffering too much by way of casualty why aren't the answerable?


I fail to see how the two sides are somehow being held as equally culpable

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"They were, as far as I can see, pointing out that Hamas was as much culpable in this as Israel"


Which is false, theyre not.


There needs to be movement towards giving palestinians dignity and freedom. Since Oslo things have got streadily worse for the Palestinians, not better, since 2001 dramatically so, the seige of Gaza has now gone on for 7 years whilst more settlements go up, more villages buldozed, more water taken.


I sincerely believe Israel has settled for managed conflict as the price it pays for the long term goal of a greater israel.

Hence my point about school massacres in the US the price people are willing to pay for gun ownership.


So what would you do in that situation, genuine question, go 'fair enough, wouldn't want to upset them or they'll rape my sister and it'll be my fault as everyone keeps pointing out, best accept life in an open prison and indefinite statelessness".


I can only see a single state being the answer, but Israel won't go for it because it'll either have to accept that likud won't be winning any more elections (a la end of apartheid in S Africa) or it'll have to drop the pretence that its a democracy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really do resent being told I'm, black and white Israeli-hating when only one side is absolutely destroying 100s of lives, deliberately targetting defenseless people and buildings and issuing meaninless warnings to "leave" withing minutes if they want to live


I condone not a jot of Hamas actions, but then given how useless they are (all things being relative) then I somehow can't find it in my heart to get quite as worked up about them. That doesn't make me black and white


I would argue I'm more nuanced than people who continually haul anti( social-media/libera/smearing/usual suspects) into EVERY FUKING ARGUMENT


But let's imagine a world where Hamas are defeated and/or realise that rockets isn't getting them anywahere - where does that leave everyone then? Do people think that both sides will be bale to go about their daily business with no need for aggro?


or will the ongoing expansion of occupied territory provoke more hostilities?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not to mention there are now several thousand more people with a burning hatred, utterly traumatised, orphaned, lost sisters mothers daughters brothers and sons, who may have been moderate or simply trying to survive their shitty existence, filled with a desire for revenge.


Given that this is the third cycle of violence and cease fire followed by status quo in 7 years, where is there hope for progress?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The comparison has been made before but if England carpet bombed Ireland because of its actions, would it be ok to say the ira were culpable?


Made by Fisk and easily Fisked


- Hamas is the De Facto elected govt of the West Bank...the IRA was not the democratically eleced govt of the Republic

- Hamas is cosntitutioly committed to the detsruction of the State of Israel - the IRA wasn't committed to teh destruction of GB


I'm despairing of the hope of progress - and key amnong ONE of the reasons is the fact that so many of the people around Israel itself absolutely refuse to acknowledge its right to exist. The last time there was some hope (oslo) the sucide bombing campaigns of the Infata(sp?) which killed 200 Israelis contributed to the election of the uncompromising right wing Israeli govt, who, I agree, have acted with murderous and pretty indiscriminate violence against any attack (however puny) from the West Bank.


Defending Israel's actions or just trying to understand them in the hope of seeing if there is a way through this (of which I doubt) you decide? but, as normal, it looks like you already have and one way traffic is the order of the day

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A bit like this: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/apr/27/tory-staff-running-network-of-anti-ulez-facebook-groups-riddled-with-racism-and-abuse
    • Because the council responsible for it is far-left....   And you haven't answered whether it is worth diverting emergency vehicles because a few cars drive through the LTN and why some lobby groups have been so desperate to close it to emergency vehicles.    Emergency services hate non-permeable junctions as they lengthen response times....f you remember it's why the council had to redesign the DV junction because emergency services kept telling them they needed to be able to drive through it...but the council resisted and resisted until they finally relented because the emergency services said their LTN had increased response times....sorry if the truth gets in the way of a good story but those are facts. The council was putting lives at risk because they refused to open the junction to emergency services. Why? What could have been the motivation for that? So, in fact, it was the emergency services who forced the council (kicking and screaming) to remove the permanent barriers and allow emergency services access. So the council finally opened the junction to emergency services and is now coming back to re-close part of the junction.  Why?  Perhaps you should be asking who is lobbying the council to close the junction or parts of it or why the council is happy to waste so much of our money on it - who are they representing as even their own consultation demonstrated they did not have support from the local community for the measures? The results showed the majority of local residents were against the measure...but they are going ahead with them anyway.   In time, I am sure the truth will come to light and those rewponsbile will be held accountable but you have to admit there is something very unusual going on with that junction - its the very definition of a (very expensive) white elephant.    
    • A Roadblock that a civilised society wouldn’t allow. 
    • Now this is cycling  BBC News - Tweed Run London bike ride evokes spirit of yesteryear https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-68900476  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...