Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have no problem with the sport of evading a charging bull if one is stupid enough to try it. Don't agree with the longwinded execution bit, especially since there appears to be no reason (eg, vermin, leather, meat).


A spot of googling Ernest Hemmingway might not go amiss.


Our Spanish exchange student thought the practice was barbaric (aged 14) if that's any help.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4646-bull/#findComment-149660
Share on other sites

Have to agree with Quinnie on this one, not a big fan at all, although I really love it when the bullfighters get the tables turned on them and the bull manages to stick a horn in there before he is pounced on by more people and slaughtered, its an unfair fight, the bull never wins, so think they should call it bull slowly being slaughtered and terrified to death as opposed to bull fight as the name suggests the bull has an equal chance of winning.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4646-bull/#findComment-149671
Share on other sites

I can't say it bothers me. I don't approve of it but I'd find it very difficult to get worked up over or upset about.


It isn't cruelty on an industrial scale (in the same way battery farming is) and a skilled matador kills the bull in a quick and humane manner.


I rather enjoy the aesthetics of it. Man vs Beast. The pomp - playing dress up, the baying crowd, the almost balletic foreplay before the bull's death, that sort of thing. And I suppose the cultural tradition of the whole thing is quite appealing too.


I'm fully aware of the flaws in all these arguments and wouldn't offer them as academic make-weights. Nonetheless, they work for me.


I suppose the cynic in me says that there are far more worthy causes in the world to put your effort into than this. In the same way I found the endles debate over fox-hunting quite dull when human poverty remains paramount, the same applies here.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4646-bull/#findComment-149675
Share on other sites

david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

>

> It isn't cruelty on an industrial scale (in the

> same way battery farming is) and a skilled matador

> kills the bull in a quick and humane manner.

>

>


You're right about battery farming. However, the actual killing of the bull bit doesn't happen until after the bull has been tortured and stuff for a good while. Have to give the people a show, apparently.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4646-bull/#findComment-149684
Share on other sites

I went to a bullfight a number of years ago in Madrid. Didn't enjoy it, felt it was very barbaric, hated the fact that the bulls were "finished off" in front of everyone. It's one of those things I wanted to experience, but certainly won't be going to another one.


One interesting thing however was the way it seemed to be a real family occasion, most of the people there were families with children, all very excited about it, and the kids didn't blink an eye at what was happening to the bulls. I'm not sure what I was expecting the audience to be like, but I wasn't expecting loads of families.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4646-bull/#findComment-149690
Share on other sites

I'd call be dropped in boiling water tortuous as well but shellfish seem to get a raw deal (if you pardon the pun). It's all a matter of perspective.


The lancing weakens the bulls stamina and increases it's liklihood of charging. The matador then finishes it quite quickly with a sword.


Animals are beaten every day. Think what jockeys do to a horse. I rather think that the English are horribly sentimental when it comes to animal welfare. It's why the hedgehog and donkey sanctuaries of this country are inundated with cheques from little old ladies whilst charities dealing with certain human issues are scrabbling around for cash.


I don't get enojoyment from animal cruelty but I just wish people would care about more important things.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4646-bull/#findComment-149691
Share on other sites

David, I agree with most of what you say - however, the business with lancing the bulls neck is quite a longish process and is not followed that swiftly by plunging the sword in.


You're deffo completely spot on with the hypocrisy of people going all gooey eyed over donkeys/dogs etc., but not seeming to give a stuff about the origins of the meat on their plate.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4646-bull/#findComment-149692
Share on other sites

You great lily-livered pinko pansies the lot of you.


Tis a noble sport and no mistake in this sanitised age when even our bombs drop bloodlessly in black & white, to have a bit of technicolor death in the afternoon.


In seriousness the English part of me wanted to be appalled when I first went but I have to say I was rather seduced by it all, perhaps appealing to something atavistically in me. Never go and see one outside of Andalucia, they don't know what they're doing, though if you do see one in Madrid, be sure to go at the height of the season when the best toreadores are there and pay through the nose for a good 'un.


As D_C says, a skilful corrida is impressive and strangely beautiful to behold. The varas, or lancing is somewhat brutal and is done simply to tire the bull out so it doesn't go on for hours; it's not pretty, but the lance should go in the hunk of fat at the back of the neck, that has no nerves, although I have seen it pierce shoulder even lung when done badly.

The skill and bravery of the banderilleros is quite a sight to behold, and then the paseos and the estocada (literally sticking with the sword) can be breathtaking, and if done correctly the bull dies instantly.


Plus the bulls live a pretty good life, unfettered by human contact, eating, roaming and shagging freely, until a moment of glorious death and hey, they even get to kill a bullfighter once in a blue moon!


I've been to one in Barcelona that was none of these things, it was ugly, brutal, savage and entirely lacking in art or aesthetics. Avoid at all costs.


If you're not inclined to get it then I don't suppose you ever will, nor do I expect you to try, why would you?


And though it's popularity was ebbing, it has enjoyed something of a cultural revival over the last decade or more and it is part of our culture and heritage and I'm glad it exists and would probably be so even had I actively loathed it that first time; it's part of what I love about Spain, they're so in touch with who and what they are as a people.


You know we should learn a thing or two from them and stop being so down on Morris dancing ;-)

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4646-bull/#findComment-149698
Share on other sites

David, your main argument appears to be that bull fighting is OK because cruelty to children is worse.


Stick to the chuffing point.


And your ancillary argument is a rather weedy "define torture". The point of cooking shellfish is so that they are cooked and can be eaten. It takes a couple of minutes. The point of killing bulls is for its own sake, it is a 'competition' with a pre-defined result. It can take quite a long time, and whether or not it's torture it is inflicting pain and prolonged suffering for entertainment*. This is what we have been asked to opine upon.


Whether or not little old ladies or hulking young toffs should give their cheques to donkey sanctuaries or to the NSPCC is just so much guff in this particular discussion.


*I guess that gives you a fairly good understanding of my viewpoint...

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4646-bull/#findComment-149725
Share on other sites

I?m in a bit of a dilemma here. I don?t know which is more distasteful. Cruelty to animals or sanctimonious London liberals, sitting on their pampered behinds and being critical about the way other people in other countries live their lives.


I?m inclined to agree with David though that if evils need to be corrected in this world bullfighting comes in very low on the list.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4646-bull/#findComment-149746
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • OOOOooooOOOooohhhHHHHHH 👜 👜 👜 
    • That's actually why the Sherlock Holmes stories were so popular. There was so little crime people found it exciting to imagine robberies and murders happening in London.
    • Yes, because of course there were no violent robberies in the olden days. Pretty much no crime happened at all I believe through the entire Victorian era.
    • Hi all, Im a Southwark council leaseholder and live downstairs in a ground floor flat, there is one flat above me, it's a house with individual front doors leading from the street into the shared pathway. My neighbour told me he has had a ring doorbell installed, no discussion as to how I would feel being on camera everytime I go in and out or in my front garden. I was told it's only for deliveries and doesn't record and only activates when pressed, however I don't know this and I feel really uncomfortable everytime I'm out in garden or on doorstep talking to people. Everytime I walk in/out, it lights up and in the eve it has a  infra red  light. Now I've read up that as he said its only for deliveries, he could set it so it only activates when pressed, however it activates with its motion sensor. Had he said to me about getting it installed, I could have had the opportunity to ask about it recording etc but nothing except it's being installed and when I arrived home it was there. I don't like being horrible to people however I feel I have not been considered in his decision and I feel very uncomfortable as, some times I have to stand on doorstep to get signal for my mobile and I really don't like the idea of being watched and listened to. Has anyone got any advice as I'm beginning to get angry as I've asked about it once and was told it only activates when pressed. I believe this is not true. I know southwark council say you need to ask permission to make sure the neighbours are OK with it, I don't really want to go down that road but I don't know how to approach the subject again. They also put a shed approx 3 foot from my back room window, these places are built so my window faces their rear garden and there upstairs window  faces mine. They said it's there temporarily, that was over a year ago and it does affect the light, plus I'm hoping to sell up soon and the view from window is mainly a dark brown shed. When I've mentioned this, I was told they have no where else to put it, whereas originally they said its only temporary, Also the floorboards above are bare and I get woke early morning and at night, the thudding is so bad my light shakes and window rattles, so I mentioned this and asked if they have rugs, I was told when they get the boards re sanded they will get rugs, I should have asked if they could get rugs and just take them up when boards being done, which I would have done had it been me living above someone, their attitude was I can just put up with it until they are ready. so they had the floor boards done, and the workmen was hammering screws, yes screws, in the floorboards, I spoke to workmen to ask how much longer and they said yes, are using screws to make less noise! I could hear the cordless screwdriver, not an issue but for every screw there were at least 8 whacks, the owners had gone out to avoid the noise  so I  spoke to workmen as the noise was unbearable, the sanding, not an issue at all, people need to get things done to their home and I'm fine that on occasions there will be temporary noise. now I have a nice crack on my bedroom ceiling, I mentioned this to owner but no response, he said there were alot of loose floorboards and it will be much better now, not so noisy, as though I don't know the difference between squeaking floor boards and thudding, and nothing was mentioned re the crack or that they now have rugs, which if it were me, I'd be trying to resolve the issue so we can get on with feeling happy in our homes. so I'm feeling it's a total lack of consideration. these places are old and Edwardian and I've lived here over 40 years, had 4 different neighbours and it's only now the noise of thudding is really bad and the people before had floorboards but nothing like this. As you can probably tell I'm really wound up and I don't want to end up exploding at them, I've always got on with neighbours and always said if there's a problem with my dog, pls let me know, always tell me, however I feel it's got to the point where I say something and I'm fobbed off. I know I should tell them but I'm angry, perhaps I should write them a letter. Any suggestions greatly appreciated and thank you for reading my rant. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...