Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I can't really tell why I dislike Gove.


Can anyone post what he has actually done wrong? I'm not defending him, I just want justification for why I popped open the champagne and ran naked down Sydenham Road shouting 'WHOOOHOOOO' when I heard the news. The police are here and I need a reason because I can't think of one except that he is annoying.

What DaveR said. As a parent I've liked almost all of the reforms he's bought in and the decent ones that Labour bought in that he's kept going. The fact that many teachers seem to hate him was just a bonus as far as I was concerned. As my son got told off for 'asking too many questions' last week , when they weren't on strike obviously, I'm all for reform and accountability.

The yah-boo playground stuff from the teachers' unions and their friends in the media is tiresome - they've had a go at every Education Secrtary in living memory, though they felt some affection towards ex-teacher Estelle Morris, who was perhaps the least competent Cabinet Minister of the Blair years. This constant shrill criticism comes across as a kneejerk childish hatred of the big boss rather than geuine criticism meant to help come to grips with the significant challenges of our mediocre education system.


As one of my favourite blogs put it last year:

"Mary Bousted, the general secretary of the Association of Teachers and Lecturers, will tell the ATL conference in Liverpool that the Conservative reforms are "undermining and harming our pupils' education," the Guardian tells us.

But that isn't news. It is what the teachers' unions have always said, whoever is in power. It be news if she had said anything different.


Which suggests there are two thumping contradictions in the unions' thinking.


The first is that they hold these two beliefs:

All schools should be run by the democratically elected government.

It is an outrage if that democratically elected government seeks to make changes in the way school are run.


The second is that they hold these two beliefs:

Every change made in education for as long as anyone can remember has been disastrous (that is why we campaigned against them).

Standards in our schools are higher than they have ever been.


Discuss. Do not attempt to write on both sides of the paper at once."


http://liberalengland.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/the-contradictions-in-teaching-unions.html


FWIW I thought Gove was politicially inept and more usually wrong than right.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What DaveR said. As a parent I've liked almost all

> of the reforms he's bought in and the decent ones

> that Labour bought in that he's kept going. The

> fact that many teachers seem to hate him was just

> a bonus as far as I was concerned. As my son got

> told off for 'asking too many questions' last week

> , when they weren't on strike obviously, I'm all

> for reform and accountability.



Ha - Chip off the old block.

I'm against constant reform of education as I guess everyone is but I'm in favour of Gove's general gist (as it appeared to me at least) that exams/coursework combo had become easier and needed to be readdressed in favour of detailed study and testing.


I believe the old fashioned A level approach of going into great detail on a particular subject rather than a generalist level of knowledge on a bigger subject area goes far in life.


The message from universities and employers was clear - A levels as they had become had left students ill-equipped for the next stage.

This reshuffle is a typical end of term political reboot of the cabinet, to make the team appear fresh with adequate disconnect from the negativity of the past, but equally able to hammer home the positives in the glare of media hype. The Tories have a toxic problem associated with their team, which could mean the difference between a hung parliament or small majority after the next election. The UKIP bubble has predictably caught a slow puncture on the road to 2015 post European Elections, and Cameron assumes by tinkering with the cabinet he can at least try to disperse some of the 'white, public school educated and privileged' tag associated with the cabinet/party in general, and appear more in touch and representative over the coming months.


Louisa.

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I'm no gove fan, but this reshuffle is a curious business.


It was flagged a couple of days ago - an election next year and Dave needed to get more women into the cabinet to nullify an obvious angle of attack from Labour, plus to lose a few of the old guard that all seem to be hanging up the boots at the next election anyway.

I get the whole rationale behind reshuffles, and I get the specifics around this one. But still, I think the dynamics at the top of the party have yet to be played out, and a couple of people will settle scores in years to come


Whatever the perception of the cabinet, I share the opinion that the more intellegent/dynamic players have been targetted and that overall, the performance of the cabinet will take a hit


2 things to qualify that:


1 - doesn't mean I often liked/agreed with what some of those moved on did

2 - doesn't mean I'm against more women in the cabinet. I'm not weeping over the Mail/Telegraph "middle aged white men" angle

Gove may have become toxic. So: Away with him; but not with his policies. A new face at the helm, yes, but the tiller is held steady, and the ship continues to move in the same direction, accruing more and more momentum. Over the falls or into safe harbour? We shall find out.


And one of the most articulate and aggressive Conservatives is freed from ministerial work to carry battle into the Labour / Liberal / UKIP camps.


This might get interesting.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The lack of affordable housing is down to Thatcher's promoting sale of council properties. When I was working, I had to deal with many families/older folk/ disabled folk in inferior housing. The worst ones were ex council properties purchased by their tenants  with a very high discount who then sold on for a profit. The new owners frequently rented out at exorbitant prices and failed to maintain the properties. I remember a gentleman who needed to be visited by a district nurse daily becoming very upset as he rented a room in an ex council flat and shared kitchen and bathroom with 6 other people  (it was a 3 bed flat) the landlord did not allow visitors to the flat and this gut was frightened he would be evicted if the nurse visited daily. Unfortunately, the guy was re admitted to hospital and ended up in a care home as he could not receive medical help at home.   Private developers  are not keen on providing a larger percentage of 'social housing' as it dents their profits. Also a social rent is still around £200 plus a week
    • Hello, I was wondering if others have had experience of roof repairs and guarantees. A while back, we had a water leak come through in our top floor room.  A roofer came and went out on the roof to take a look - they said it was to do with a leak near the chimney.   They did some rendering around the chimney and this cost £1800 plus £750 for scaffolding (so £2,550 total).  They said the work came with a 10 year guarantee. About a year later, there was another leak on the same wall, which looked exactly the same size and colour as the previous leak. But it was about 2 metres away from it, on the other side of a window.  I contacted the roofer about this new leak, thinking it would be covered by the guarantee. However, he said the new leak was due to a different and unrelated problem, and so was not covered by the guarantee. This new leak, he said, was due to holes in the felt underneath the tiles. He said there are holes in the felt all over the roof (so if this was the cause, I expect the first leak may have been caused by that too - but he didn't mention the holes in the felt for the first repair). It feels like the 10-year guarantee doesn't mean much at all.  I realise that the guarantee couldn't cover all future problems with the roof, but where do you draw the line with what's reasonable?  Is it that a leak is only covered if an identical leak happens in exactly the same place?  There were no terms and conditions with the guarantee, which I didn't question at the time.  
    • I always like Redemptions coffee though I've not visted for awhile..Romeo Jones was always my 1st choice for takeout Coffee Redemption 2nd. What IS with all these independent Yoga and Pilates Studios? Theres one on London Rd in Forest Hill (Mind) thats recently opened and then theres the Pilates place thats opened on North X Road. I looked at the prices of the one on NorthX road and was frankly shocked at how expensive it is, The FH one is slightly less.  Made me decide to stick with classes in The local authority gym
    • Dulwich Village update: The old DVillage location is (again?) under offer. The storefront next to the new grocer is going to open as a yoga and pilates studio...the name of which I've forgotten. 🤦‍♂️  Megan's is starting to push its takeaway coffee and cannibalise some of Redemption Coffee's market share. Is Megan's struggling? It's quite a big restaurant they have and rent cant be cheap. The reinventing of the Megan's branch on Lordship Lane as Ollie's seems to have stalled. And Redemption is looking a bit tired these days...
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...