Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I can't really tell why I dislike Gove.


Can anyone post what he has actually done wrong? I'm not defending him, I just want justification for why I popped open the champagne and ran naked down Sydenham Road shouting 'WHOOOHOOOO' when I heard the news. The police are here and I need a reason because I can't think of one except that he is annoying.

What DaveR said. As a parent I've liked almost all of the reforms he's bought in and the decent ones that Labour bought in that he's kept going. The fact that many teachers seem to hate him was just a bonus as far as I was concerned. As my son got told off for 'asking too many questions' last week , when they weren't on strike obviously, I'm all for reform and accountability.

The yah-boo playground stuff from the teachers' unions and their friends in the media is tiresome - they've had a go at every Education Secrtary in living memory, though they felt some affection towards ex-teacher Estelle Morris, who was perhaps the least competent Cabinet Minister of the Blair years. This constant shrill criticism comes across as a kneejerk childish hatred of the big boss rather than geuine criticism meant to help come to grips with the significant challenges of our mediocre education system.


As one of my favourite blogs put it last year:

"Mary Bousted, the general secretary of the Association of Teachers and Lecturers, will tell the ATL conference in Liverpool that the Conservative reforms are "undermining and harming our pupils' education," the Guardian tells us.

But that isn't news. It is what the teachers' unions have always said, whoever is in power. It be news if she had said anything different.


Which suggests there are two thumping contradictions in the unions' thinking.


The first is that they hold these two beliefs:

All schools should be run by the democratically elected government.

It is an outrage if that democratically elected government seeks to make changes in the way school are run.


The second is that they hold these two beliefs:

Every change made in education for as long as anyone can remember has been disastrous (that is why we campaigned against them).

Standards in our schools are higher than they have ever been.


Discuss. Do not attempt to write on both sides of the paper at once."


http://liberalengland.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/the-contradictions-in-teaching-unions.html


FWIW I thought Gove was politicially inept and more usually wrong than right.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What DaveR said. As a parent I've liked almost all

> of the reforms he's bought in and the decent ones

> that Labour bought in that he's kept going. The

> fact that many teachers seem to hate him was just

> a bonus as far as I was concerned. As my son got

> told off for 'asking too many questions' last week

> , when they weren't on strike obviously, I'm all

> for reform and accountability.



Ha - Chip off the old block.

I'm against constant reform of education as I guess everyone is but I'm in favour of Gove's general gist (as it appeared to me at least) that exams/coursework combo had become easier and needed to be readdressed in favour of detailed study and testing.


I believe the old fashioned A level approach of going into great detail on a particular subject rather than a generalist level of knowledge on a bigger subject area goes far in life.


The message from universities and employers was clear - A levels as they had become had left students ill-equipped for the next stage.

This reshuffle is a typical end of term political reboot of the cabinet, to make the team appear fresh with adequate disconnect from the negativity of the past, but equally able to hammer home the positives in the glare of media hype. The Tories have a toxic problem associated with their team, which could mean the difference between a hung parliament or small majority after the next election. The UKIP bubble has predictably caught a slow puncture on the road to 2015 post European Elections, and Cameron assumes by tinkering with the cabinet he can at least try to disperse some of the 'white, public school educated and privileged' tag associated with the cabinet/party in general, and appear more in touch and representative over the coming months.


Louisa.

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I'm no gove fan, but this reshuffle is a curious business.


It was flagged a couple of days ago - an election next year and Dave needed to get more women into the cabinet to nullify an obvious angle of attack from Labour, plus to lose a few of the old guard that all seem to be hanging up the boots at the next election anyway.

I get the whole rationale behind reshuffles, and I get the specifics around this one. But still, I think the dynamics at the top of the party have yet to be played out, and a couple of people will settle scores in years to come


Whatever the perception of the cabinet, I share the opinion that the more intellegent/dynamic players have been targetted and that overall, the performance of the cabinet will take a hit


2 things to qualify that:


1 - doesn't mean I often liked/agreed with what some of those moved on did

2 - doesn't mean I'm against more women in the cabinet. I'm not weeping over the Mail/Telegraph "middle aged white men" angle

Gove may have become toxic. So: Away with him; but not with his policies. A new face at the helm, yes, but the tiller is held steady, and the ship continues to move in the same direction, accruing more and more momentum. Over the falls or into safe harbour? We shall find out.


And one of the most articulate and aggressive Conservatives is freed from ministerial work to carry battle into the Labour / Liberal / UKIP camps.


This might get interesting.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But I don't think that was what you meant, was it? But he can hardly be held responsible for what somebody else did! Just discovered I forgot to post the above  last night, and now it's overtaken by long posts.  I don't have sufficient knowledge  to counter some of what has been said above, some of which appears to be opinion rather than facts, so it would be pointless for me to say anything else.
    • I am sure our lovely Evri delivery team, who do a firkin hard job, take the time between drops to read the East Dulwich Forum 🤫
    • For every person like OP that moans their doorbell was rung and there was a knock on the door, there's someone else moaning that they didn't hear the delivery drivers. If you've ever done delivery work you'll know that loads of people's bells don't work. The delivery drivers probably goes to a hundred doors a day: press bell, knock door, drop package, move on. If you don't like delivery drivers, insist on delivery by Royal Mail where the workers have wages and a union - or just stop ordering shit online that's artificially cheap. But most of us (me included) don't want that
    • If someone comes to my house and bangs my door and slams my gate, I'd speak to them about it nicely and ask if they would please not do that. And then subsequently less nicely if they keep doing it, ending in reporting them.  We don't slam doors at home and I don't put up with that either. I can see us moving to a culture where we bribe drivers to be nice by tipping them, but we shouldn't have to. It's not necessary - does not matter if they are on minimum wage or not, or if society means that delivery services are outsourced or whatever reason anyone would like to concoct.     
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...